Books and movies have been around for many years and lately movie directors have been making more and more movies based off of books. Most of the time, directors keep the plot relatively the same to ensure the movie stays true to the book, but sometimes they decide to change the message entirely by changing just a few key events. An example of this is the short story “Harrison Bergeron” written by Kurt Vonnegut and the film 2081 directed by Chandler Tuttle. Although the short film if based off of the short story, there are significant changes to the tone, plot, and characterization that creates a more sympathetic mood then what is set in the story. The first significant change in the film is the action and dialogue of the main character, …show more content…
Like most people in the story, George and Hazel Bergeron are victims of this governments cruelty and throughout the story you can sense this choppy, monotone feel when Hazel, his wife, talks about his handicaps and tries to help him, but he tried to shut her down by saying that “. . . [he doesn’t] mind [them]. . .” then continues to say how he “. . . [doesn’t] notice [them] anymore. It’s just a part of [him].” Hazel even goes as far as trying to get him to “. . . take out a few of [the] lead balls.” out of the bag he carries around his neck but the government has threatened to give anyone who removes any part of their handicapes “Two years in prison. . .” and fines. Since the handicaps are meant to make everyone equal by inhibiting people 's ability to think properly, to make prettier people seem ugly, and make stronger peoplemore weak. It makes sense why George hates talking about them and quickly shut down Hazel’s proposal. All of this is written in a way that makes the story feel robotic and boring verses Tuttle’s movie. Throughout the movie, the conversations between George and his wife is a bit more intense. When Hazel tries to ask him about “lighten[ing]” the weight, he roughly shuts her down before she finished her sentence by saying that there “There isn’t [a way].” He even went on to explain why “tak[ing] them off” will lead to him “want[ing] to keep them off. And we both know how we would feel about that.” Hazel said that she would “hate it”. He shut her down so quickly, she just agreed with him out of submission. She even tries to lighten the mood by say how it would be “interesting to hear all the different sounds” George hears in his handicap, but again he just shuts her down. Just these few differences in these characters attitudes how the different tones throughout the story versus the movie and how the movie has a much more serious and intense feeling
However, there is another side of George that the author emphasizes to the audience. George is shown very defensive over his children and “lunges at Johnny” (56) due to Johnny bringing the subject of his children in their disagreement. This action indicates George’s frustration building up and the breaking point of his own sanity from the constant torment from Johnny. Upon this, the audience is able to acknowledge the apparent change of tone as George feeling defeated. The characters counteract the action with one another results in opposition between their
In the movie, Hazel gets up from the couch to wash the dishes as George watches television. She ends up missing the whole broadcast, where a man struggles to announce that Harrison had broken out of jail, and is dangerous to everyone. However, in the movie, he tries again, and succeeds, but in the story, one of the utterly beautiful ballerinas has to say it for him. This is one example of the difference in plot, since the two are different. The suspense carries on as Harrison Bergeron, himself, enters the dance studio.
Hazel notices that George is looking wearier than usual and tells him to lie down and relax, but George doesn’t want to because that will cause him to not be equal with Hazel and everyone else. In order to make sure everyone is equal, the government plays a huge role
Yet the distinct differences between them also affect the plots to an extent to which the suspense in the movie is less compared to the novel. Although the differences greatly alter the two, it makes each of them unique and exclusive from each other. Despite these differences, there is one theme that links both the novel and the movie together: that people with different personalities, interests, and appearances are also the same to each other. The book shows more examples of this theme than the movie, making the novel more understanding to other individuals than the film itself. Because of this, we would recommend the book and film to those who experience a likeliness to the conflicts in each storyline, such as a fight between two different social
Hazel is not allowed to because of her lack of intelligence. They are watching TV, and George notices that they are not allowed to show their full potential because of the masks and weights they have to wear. George starts to think of his son, but is stopped because of the radio Hazel encourages him to lay down on his “handicap bed” that has weights attached to him. Harrison is now on screen, it shows him being good looking, strong, and intelligent. He rips off all his handicap items and asks a ballerina to join him.
And, details were added and deleted in the transition from the book to movie
There are many simularities and differences in the book and movie " The
George has no money and no control over his wife. Everyone seems to walk all over his, as if he isn’t even there. I think George knows that his wife is not happy, but he chooses to ignore it. However, when he finds the dog collar and figures out Myrtle is cheating on him, part of his anger shows. He thinks he can fix his marriage by locking his wife up and taking his wife to leave town.
Most people would be angry or upset, however George cannot feel this way due to the consequences that may follow. When a character does feel a human emotion, they soon forget. “ ‘Forget the sad things.’ said George. ‘I always do,’ said Hazel”(44).
Another change was a few of the crimes. Philip Lombard 's crime was originally that he killed a tribe, but was changed to him killing the woman that was carrying his baby out of wedlock; Vera Claythorne/ Anne Clyde crime was changed from letting a young boy drown to murdering her sister 's fiance; Emily Brent/ Ilona Burgen 's was, in the book, shaming her maid into suicide and was, in the movie, killing her husband; General Macarthur/ General Mandrake had a small change it was first him putting his wife 's lover to the front lines of battle to him sending multiple men to the front lines of
Books and movies have been around for many years and lately movie directors have been making more and more movies based off of books. Most people do not know that around 50% of movies are based off of books. Although, it really depends on what people mean when a movie is “based” off a book. Some directors say a movie is based off a book, but has a different plot and seems totally different. So, in order to keep true to the book, directors keep the plot relatively the same, but there are a few times they decide to change the message entirely by changing just a few key events.
Once a person is introduced into different ways of thinking, they feel that they are restricted to think in other ways. This restriction, is the handicap. The handicap prevents George from thinking too much. From using his ability to think in a different way. In this society, many people appear that they are not open minded.
People who are not equal get handicapped in a way. George and Hazel Bergeron are the parents of Harrison, who was taken away from them when he was fourteen by the Handicapper General. George and Hazel are not even sad that their son was taken away. Hazel has average intelligence so she can only think of things in short bursts. On the other
“The minute people start cheating on laws, what do you think happens to society?” When someone as intelligent as George says something so predictable, this shows that society has been crushed and people have accepted this way of living and are not planning to do anything to change it. This helps Vonnegut in adopting his tone of ridicule and disapproval. After Harrison and the ballerina were shot dead by the Handicapper General as a consequence for their rebellious act, Hazel forgets about their son’s death moments after it happens and therefore it receives no attention from both George and Hazel. The author takes on a despairing tone at the end of the story and shows disapproval of the society’s state, where something so important such as a family death receives no
One could never fully understand the other. If the roles were switched, it would be easier to understand each other, and people wouldn’t be able to visually see the others differences. Hazel says “you [have] been so tired lately... if there was just some way we could make a little hole in the bottom of the bag, and just take out a few of them lead balls...” and George says “Two years in prison and two thousand dollars fine for ball I took out...” This shows how oblivious Hazel, and ungifted person, is towards George and his handicaps.