There are many differences that can be highlighted between a hawk and a dog. However, in “Hawk Roosting” and “Golden Retrievals” the use of specific elements helps the reader to understand the characters themselves and how they view the world around them. Respectively, Hughes and Doty each use specific sentence structure, tone, and strong diction to characterize the speakers and present differing views of the world. The use of specific sentence structure throughout the poems further underlines the differences in the two characters and the attitude towards the world. Hughes’s use of sentences which exemplify complete thoughts illustrates to the reader that the hawk will take its time when completing a task and gives its full and absolute attention. The complete …show more content…
Because of the differing overall tones in each poem, it is easily inferred by the reader that the two characters have two completely different, if not opposite, views of the world. The overall tone in Hughes’ poem is dark and controlling, leading the reader to believe that the hawk is not interested in the brighter things that life has to offer. The use of phrases like “perfect kills” and “my right” emphasize the height at which the hawk views itself. Rather, he believes that he himself is at the absolute height of all creation whereas the tone of Doty’s poem is light and child-like to emphasize the attitude of the dog and his love for everything around him. Using tone in two differing poems highlights the two main differences between the hawk and the dog and their outlooks upon life.Hughes and Doty each use diction to present their characters’ differing views of the world. The diction used in “Hawk Roosting” is stronger and more intense than that of “Golden Retrievals.” By using phrases, or words, such as “of advantage” and “permitted” ultimately create the viewpoint of the hawk: the world is something to be owned and controlled, not enjoyed. However, Doty uses diction in a completely different
One thing humans have an addiction to is stressing, worrying, overthinking, taking things for granted, and way more. Both poems Two-Headed Calf and Golden Retrievals show the reason why people should live in the moment instead of worrying about the future or thinking about the past because you don't know if you're gonna get tomorrow. First and foremost, the poem Two-Headed Calf by Laura Gilpin makes the reader sit back and think, but it also evokes the reader's sympathy for the two-headed calf. The first poetic device that affects the poem Two-Headed Calf is cacophony. Cacophony is shown when the poem states “freak of nature, they will wrap his body in newspaper and carry him to the museum.”
The Bird and the Cooking Pot Imagine your home. A place where you belong. Now imagine it moves to another state. It keeps moving and moving. Imagine settling down somewhere, but then having to move again and again.
In "Black Hawk's Surrender Speech, 1832," Black Hawk utilizes rhetorical devices to portray what it was like to face white men. He limned what he surpassed in order to protect his people and land. Black Hawk utilizes simile frequently. Suggesting that one of the worst days had been to see his men murdered. "The bullets flew like birds in the air," referring to how the bullets injured his men.
The poems “A Blessing” and “Predators” can be the same or different because both have different animals but they act differently. In the poems “A Blessing” and “Predators” there will be comparing and contrasting in both poems, “A Blessing” and “Predators” Both poems “A Blessing” and “Predators” they both have tamed animals in both poems because the horses are tamed in “Blessing” and they are surrounded by fences/barbed wire so, they can’t get out on page 139 and paragraph 5 it says “We step over the barbed wire into the pasture” and on “Predators” they have cats and dogs who are tamed too. They are both different because in the poem “A Blessing” has peaceful and calm animals and the horses peaceful because they nuzzled on a person’s hand on
Furthermore, the superficial simplicity of Hughes’ poems is not meant to deceive, but to encourage readers to engage in poetry from different perspectives because there is more to the poem than meets the eye. Additional questions remain, however. Does Hughes’ experimentation with form threaten to mischaracterize or further objectify the subjects of his poetry? Does Hughes ascribe too much value to these ordinary objects and places? Are there limitations to Hughes’ experimentation?
The peacocks become a central point of the narrator’s life. The narrator describes the appearance and attitude of these grand birds in great
Jane Kenyon addresses the emotional pain that one overcomes when losing a pet in this poem. Most people relate to their pets as their own family, so their lost becomes a terrible feeling. Even though our pets my not be able to communicate with us verbally they always seem to be the best listeners. This poem was nice; as well as a remembrance of the former pet. The tone/mood is typically depressing as well as the speaker’s emotion.
In Emily Dickinson’s poem, “The Wind Tapped,” a brief visit from a bird is emphasized through silence of punctuation, mimicking the movements. The speaker’s contradicting attitude toward impending isolation reveals the importance of communication and companionship by her choice of brief intonation and complex structure. Smooth and simple word choices provide abrupt, yet reflexive moments. The simile, “like a tired man” (line 1) describes the effortless impact it has similar to an exhausted man. This is important to notice because it gives the wind a subtle and oblivious character.
Symbolism plays a crucial role in relating both works of literature to the main theme of freedom. Robinson Jeffers uses symbolism all throughout his poem. One of the major symbols being the hawk in of itself. Birds, in general, are related to a sense of freedom, the sky is the limit. Birds have the ability to fly, and flying in itself represents freedom.
Throughout the poem, the author uses a variety of literary devices such as imagery, alliteration, and personification to express the complexity of nature. Hughes also forwards his quandary of painting the scene to us by explaining his predicament through aforementioned literary devices. First and foremost, Hughes captures the rambunctious nature of the ecosystem he is trying to paint by using alliteration. In the opening line, he describes water lilies as a “green level of lily leaves”, capitalizing on the l in each word. He does this again multiple times, such as the “flies’ furious arena” or “bullets by”.
In the poems “Traveling through the Dark” by William Stafford and “Woodchucks” by Maxine Kumin, two distinct speakers are portrayed by their contrasting approaches to the death of wild animals. “Traveling through the Dark” shows a thoughtful relationship between a man and nature as he comes across the gruesome sight of a pregnant deer that has been hit on the road. “Woodchuck,” on the other hand, introduces the unpleasant reality of human egotism toward animals as the main character is seen slaughtering birds. Although “Traveling through the Dark” and “Woodchucks” both illustrate nature and the death of animals, a combination of tone, diction, and imagery stresses a barrier amidst them, revealing the dissimilar mentalities of both speakers in handling situations expressively.
In the same way, the two poems share the same imagery; birds being treated like slaves. Both birds are being tortured by their owners. In Sympathy, it says,
Grief is abstract and there is no effective method that will heal it easily. This is portrayed in Helen Macdonald’s memoir, H is for Hawk, where she tells her story about her battle to cope with grief after the loss of her father. Throughout this book, Macdonald shares her struggles and relapses as she tries to get through these challenging times. To cope with grief, she turns to hawking because she feels this will be most effective. Helen soon becomes dependent on her hawk, Mable, and uses her to escape grief which leads her to feel like a hawk and loose her connection to humanity.
The above poem had been written in Spanish by Pablo Neruda and translated to Engilsh by Alfred Yankauer (poem has been taken from internet). INTERPRETATION: Whenever we read a poem, we think of the theme of the poem that actually refers to the subject of the poem, the tone of the poem that refers to the atmosphere, mood and feelings that are conveyed through the poem, the poetic devices used in the poem that describes the fascinating effect of the poem, it also enhances the beauty and help convey the theme and tone recursively. Poets use of many poetic devices such as Simile (that is a comparison between two things with the use of “like” or “as”), Metaphor (it is a direct comparison between two things without the use of like or as), Imagery(
Kwinton Smith ENGLISH 101: Essay 1: Poetry Instructor Graves June 17. 2013 Living in the Moment In the two poems “The Fish” and “To His Coy Mistress” the common theme would be not to waste time and to make the most of life. The author of “The Fish,” Elizabeth Bishop uses a fish to talk about making the most in life and in “To His Coy Mistress,” Andrew Marvell uses a mistress to help push across the idea of not wasting time.