Hayden Vs Letitia Case Study
Case Name and Citation
HAYDEN vs. UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME 716 N.E.2d 603 (1999)
Court of Appeals of Indiana
Summary of the Key Facts in the Case
On September 16, 1995 William Hayden and Letitia Hayden attended a football game that was played on the University of Notre Dame’s campus. William and Letitia were season ticket holders with the university that sat in their reserved seats, which were located in the south endzone behind the goalpost.
While the game was underway, in the second quarter of the football game, one of the teams kicked the football in the direction of the goal. There is a net behind the goalposts that are supposed to raise before the ball is kicked to keep the ball out of the stands. The net at this particular event
…show more content…
The other times the ball wasn’t caught by the net, the ball would travel near the same area that the Hayden’s were seated. The fans around their seats would lunge outward to try and catch the ball just like when the incident occurred in September. William, like Letitia, was knocked down from fans around their seated area.
Defendant Argument
The University of Notre Dame argues that they do not owe Letitia Hayden a duty to protect her from the third party’s actions. The reasoning behind this was that the actions of a third party are unforeseeable, therefore Notre Dame owed Letitia Hayden no duty to anticipate the actions and protect her. Therefore, Notre Dame is not liable.
Holdings
The judge ruled that the University of Notre Dame did in fact owe Letitia Hayden a duty to take necessary precautions to protect her from injury, caused by the actions of other fans in the area that were trying to get ahold of the ball in the same seating area. It was also found that the trial court was in fact incorrect in originally entering summary judgment and finding that no duty existed in favor of the University of Notre
San Francisco Giants Case Summary
652 Words | 3 PagesThe issue presented in this case is whether the San Francisco Giants was negligent when Janice Lewis was pushed and fell on the top of the metal bars during the parade. The San Francisco Giants Will be found negligence of San Francisco Giants breached the parade duty to its patrons and, as a result of that breach, Janice Lewis was injured. McGarry v. Sax, 70 Cal. Rptr.
Case: City Of Newark Firefighters Union
825 Words | 4 PagesThe Court’s legal conclusions: The Court reversed the initial judgement and ruled in favor of the Plaintiffs in the appeal citing the three arguments given in the City’s case were
Hannon And The Co-Owners Essay
732 Words | 3 PagesFinally, in her opposition Byrne contends that there was a special relationship between Hannon and the Co-Owners because: 1) Hannon had formerly served on the Co-Owners’ board (Compl. ¶ 13); and 2) that because he—as well as all unit owners—are members of the Co-Owners, and therefore the Co-Owners are vicariously liable for Hannon’s conduct. (Compl. ¶ 4). Both arguments fail. First Byrne correctly articulates that the relevant question regarding the Co-Owners liability for Hannon’s criminal activity is “whether the person or entity sued had control over the conduct of the third party who caused the harm by virtue of some special relationship.” Warr, 433 Md. at 183 (emphasis added).
People Vs Hollins Case Study
222 Words | 1 PagesIn the case of People v. Hollins, which involved a 32 year old man having consensual sex with a 17 year old girl was not necessarily violating the statutory rape law; he was charged with child pornography due to the fact that he had filmed the encounter and under Illinois statute, which defines child pornography as exploitation of a minor under 18. In my mindset, I do not believe that he would have the right to any due process or equal protection arguments. My opinion stems from this because due process in short, is defined as arrests and trials meeting minimum standards of fairness and upholding laws to ensure they do not violate constitutional rights. The man being charged however was never violated of his constitutional rights because
Plessy Vs. Ferguson: Supreme Court Case
138 Words | 1 PagesRuling: the court ruled that separate but equal facilities
What Is The Supreme Court Case Of West Virginia State Board Of Education V. Barnette
608 Words | 3 Pages" Nevertheless, the case was decided in Barnette's
Opening Statement For Scarlet Letter
678 Words | 3 PagesThe Scarlet Letter Opening Statement Good morning ladies and gentlemen of the jury, my name is Matthew Myers, and it is my privilege to represent the honorable Dr. Roger Chillingworth, as he defends himself against the very serious accusation of murder. The physical evidence brought into account will prove the innocence of the defendant, and at the conclusion of these proceedings we will be asking you, the jury for a verdict of not guilty. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, this is a case based solely on circumstantial evidence; founded in salacious rumors, gossip, and speculation.
Catch In The End-Zone Analysis
181 Words | 1 PagesThe student also asked the defensive coach what happened and he said, "Wilson caught the ball with luck that night, he caught it on the ground." Although both schools thought something different like Dillard 's High School say it was a lucky catch,
The Case Of Gerry Dinardo Continue A New Contract At Vanderbilt University
984 Words | 4 PagesIn November of 1994, at the discretion of Vanderbilt, Louisiana State University corresponded with DiNardo to recruit him as the head football coach for their team. Upon DiNardo’s acceptance of the position with LSU, Vanderbilt requested liquated damages. DiNardo’s failure to comply led Vanderbilt to file a claim for breach of contract under section 8 for damages; the defendant removed the case to federal court where the proceedings were tried under summary judgment. The district court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, asserting the contracted damages were reasonable and lawful, that the plaintiff had not waived their rights to liquidated damages, and that the contract’s extension was legally binding. DiNardo appealed to the Sixth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals.
Anne Elizabeth Cohen Summary
345 Words | 2 PagesAnne Elizabeth Cohen is Of Counsel to Debevoise & Plimpton LLP. , having retired as a Partner from the firm’s Litigation Department in 2013. For almost twenty-eight years, her wide-ranging practice focused on complex tort litigation and internal investigations and she represented defendants in firearms, Agent Orange, smoking and health, toxic shock syndrome, pharmaceutical and asbestos cases. Anne grew-up in Cincinnati and had been a reporter for the Cincinnati Post before deciding to practice law. She received her A.B. from Smith in 1976 and an M.S.L. from Yale Law School in 1982, where she studied for a year as a Ford Foundation fellow while on leave from the Post.
Essay On Concussions
168 Words | 1 PagesFighting for the playoffs, The Steelers threw the ball to Antonio Brown with 22 seconds left. He dropped it; Cincinnati Bengals linebacker Vontaze Burfict hit Antonio Brown directly in the head. He was knocked out unconscious. The Steelers won the game with a field goal. When you play Football, you’re supposed to hit to the chest.
Hickox Vs Wilson Case Study
138 Words | 1 PagesAt the annual retreat for the Major League for the Major League Baseball umpires, a Wilson representative gave the plaintiff an umpire’s mask with what he claimed that the mask was a new, safer design. Some months later, the plaintiff wore the mask while he worked behind the home plate during a game in Washington D.C. Towards the end of the game, he was struck in the mask with a foul ball. The impact of the ball gave him a concussion, and damaged a joint between the bones in his inner ear.
Wrongful Death Case: The Hill V. Ohio County
165 Words | 1 PagesThe Hill v. Ohio County involves a wrongful death case in which the hospital refused to admit Juanita Monroe. She thought she was in labor. As a result, she delivered her child at home without medical attention and died shortly after giving birth. The plaintiff was Lorene Hill, administer of Monroe’s estate, against Ohio Country Hospital. The question arises whether there was a breach of duty by the hospital in accordance to the institution’s admission policy.
Ethics Case Of Darling V. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital
503 Words | 3 PagesAt the end of this case, the court had this to
More about Hayden Vs Letitia Case Study
San Francisco Giants Case Summary
652 Words | 3 PagesCase: City Of Newark Firefighters Union
825 Words | 4 PagesHannon And The Co-Owners Essay
732 Words | 3 PagesPeople Vs Hollins Case Study
222 Words | 1 PagesPlessy Vs. Ferguson: Supreme Court Case
138 Words | 1 PagesWhat Is The Supreme Court Case Of West Virginia State Board Of Education V. Barnette
608 Words | 3 PagesOpening Statement For Scarlet Letter
678 Words | 3 PagesCatch In The End-Zone Analysis
181 Words | 1 PagesThe Case Of Gerry Dinardo Continue A New Contract At Vanderbilt University
984 Words | 4 PagesWhy Is Plessy V. Ferguson Important
665 Words | 3 PagesAnne Elizabeth Cohen Summary
345 Words | 2 PagesEssay On Concussions
168 Words | 1 PagesHickox Vs Wilson Case Study
138 Words | 1 PagesWrongful Death Case: The Hill V. Ohio County
165 Words | 1 PagesEthics Case Of Darling V. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital
503 Words | 3 Pages