Leadership style also combines certain traits, skills, attitudes, and behaviors. Hence, different styles are used according to the situation. It is important that as a leader, you know when to mitigate your style to fit the situation. Problems occur when a leader settles on a style that they’re comfortable with and continue to use the same style, over and over again, regardless of whether or not it is appropriate. As you read through this section, be mindful that my aim is to give you the tools to be a more effective leader.
People look up to leaders and developing and maintaining trust is a key part in leadership. Trust, integrity and honesty work in both directions. Leaders need to trust their subordinates just as much as followers need to trust their leaders. The third characteristic of an effective leader identified by Pearson-Goff and Herrington (2013) is legitimacy. Legitimacy plays a part in leadership through the old adage ‘been there, done that’.
For a person to find his or her path in the world and to lead others effectively, one need to develop a clear vision of what she or he is aiming to accomplish and be able to communicate that vision with others to gain support. However, each person has a different vision and as a leader one’s personal vision, influence the kind of the personal leadership philosophy; he or she has. This explains why different people, demonstrate a different personal leadership philosophy. In short, personal leadership philosophy consists of, how a person views leadership and describes how he or she regards himself as a leader. Creating a leadership philosophy is a personal process which enables a person to understand what she or he believe leadership is all about
By clearly delineating tasks, removing obstacles and rewarding performers, the path goal theory suggests that “subordinates will be motivated if they think that they are capable of performing their work, if they believe their efforts will result in a certain outcome, and if they believe that the payoffs for doing their work are worthwhile” (Northouse, 2013, p. 137). Satisfaction has been made contingent on effective performance. The intensity of the way the leader leads will depend on the circumstances. For example if the follower is capable or motivated, or the given task is easy or difficult, the method of this leadership style may vary from dictorial to the leader being participative. According to House and Mitchel, depending on the circumstance, the leader could adopt four different styles - supportive, directive, participative and
As such delegation of authority will have an effective result (Management Study Guide, 2013). Showing your commitment, sets the example for others to follow, leading to greater loyalty and respect. The approval and respect of a leader highly depends on the commitment he has on work-plans and time schedules. Employees generally follow a committed
I agree with this statement. The followers need to be able to like their leader and get inspiration from them. However, if the followers do not like their leader, they might rebel or protest. A good leader must have moral integrity. I agree with this statement because in order to lead, you need to build trust with people around you.
d. Critically analyze and evaluate the different theories and approaches to leadership in given context. Giant Hypermarket use situational leadership • Situational leadership is a leadership style that defines a leader can adjust his or her style to fit or suit to the situation they are trying to affect. The person need to able adapt to their circumstances. • Situational leadership are benefit to organization which are encourages leaders to flexible choose the style that fits their goals and objectives. Situational leadership is not due to the leaders’ specific skills, but is the leader change their skills and ability to what benefits the followers or team members.
So either they have it or not! Others believe that leadership is mostly demonstrated through the the relationship between leaders and followers. Most of the people believe that leadership is really important for the effectiveness of the organization (Cherry, 2013) since it influences others in understanding everything that needs to be done and how. Moreover,leadership motivates employees in order to accomplish the organizational goals. The topic of leadership effectiveness is of special interest, and the discussion keeps returning to the question of what makes a person an effective leader (Yukl, 1998).
a) Leadership is a process, (b) leadership involves influence, (c) leadership occurs in groups, and (d) leadership involves common goals. Leadership is a process whereby an individual influence a group of individuals to achieve a common goal according to (Northouse,2013). Leadership is about inspiring people to a good cause rather than holding positions of formal authority. I will apply my servant leadership practice by striving to incorporate the open-door policy to communicate effectively with my team. Have awareness to the daily operations and follow up with my staff.
This kind of leadership assists a group of people to move from one stage of development to a higher one and in doing so to address and fulfil better human need. By being actively engaged in an organization he/she leads, the leader becomes not only a head of a group, but a moral change agent. Transformational leaders then are change agent who initiate and implement new direction within organizations. This theory is similar to charismatic theory that leaders should have confidence that they do their duties and responsibilities to provide the needs and gives the best interest of their members and help them to enhance their skills and potentials. In addition, this theory it also describes the leaders in accomplishing their tasks to develop and implement important activities for the success of the organization.