The Wire is a show about the Baltimore drug game, told through the lense of law enforcement, drug dealers, drug users, and the people of Baltimore. Sexism, racism, patriarchy, and heteronormativity are all seen within the show, but the two concepts that the show seems to centers around most are the concepts of Marxism and Hegemonic masculinity. Marxism is defined as the “dictatorship of the proletariat”(Merriam-Webster) which essentially means the control of the laboring class by those who have more power and more money which can be influenced by race, class, and social standing. In The Wire the interest of the powerful people is being served at the expense of the less powerful in many ways. The most prominent example that stood out was when …show more content…
We see that hegemonic masculinity is central to the construction of the characters in The Wire. In many cases, the personality of a person would not be complex or developed enough if it were not for hegemonic ideals that they portray. For example, the two officers who arrested Bodie (J.D. Williams) embody hegemonic masculinity in many ways.While arresting Bodie, the black officer, Ellis (Seth Gillman), said “one thing about Kema, she’ll put a hurtin’ on you like a man” this implies that men are the toughest people and that when a man hurts you it is like nothing else that could ever happen. Another example is when Bodie, Ellis, and Herc (Domenick Lombardozzi) were in the room playing pool, Herc said “admit you’re wrong, be a man”, this shows us that his character equates being able to own up to your actions is a quality that the ideal man should have. Hegemonic masculinity is a often associated drive, ambition, self reliance, and aggressiveness” (Messerschmidt). Both of these examples show us that the construction of the characters would not be the same if it weren't for the ideals of hegemonic masculinity that they portray through the entire …show more content…
The Wire seemed so real and so genuine. I did not feel like it was clouded by theatrics and it embodied a gritty sense of realism that I loved. I wondered what drew me into the show,and what captured my attention to suddenly and abruptly. In Thompson and Mittell it tells us that “ beginning a series with a sense of frustration and disorientation captures the tone of daily life” ,this is true for The Wire, and I believe it is what made me so fascinated. I was not sure how the show would play on the stereotypes and misconceptions of black people so I was leary in watching it, but from the beginning,the show had as sense of realism that really helped me understand the characteristics and the series more. The Wire is a show that can appeal to many different audiences. Real life problems, and people from both sides of the law are telling one story which speaks to how real life is. The show focuses on the people and the system and how those two intersect. Marxism, capitalism, hegemony, classism, sexism, and racism among other things, all make this show seem real and appealing. Analyzing the show can teach viewers a lot about society and the factors that contribute to some of the disadvantages that people
This novel highlights the fact of the injustices people of color are faced with in everyday life. In the introduction of this book, Michelle Alexander highlights the criminal justice system and how rather than identifying people by their race, people of color are labeled as criminals. I believe the criminal justice system, racial caste, ideology, and global examples of racial caste are all connected to racial inequality. I feel that the race and criminal justice system are connected on the basis that people of color are seen as unequal when compared to Caucasians. In the reading the author provides good examples of how officers are well trained at defending against claims of racial bias in policing.
The most pervasive theme is racism. The white policeman- - whose father lost his janitorial business because of particular governmental policy regarding minorities in society hones - is irate at African-Americans. A youthful African-American carjacker spouts the incendiary Black Power talk of the 1970s. Stereotyping is another theme in the film. For instance, the white DA's wife associates the locksmith with being a pack part in view of his ethnicity.
Friday Night Lights addresses this actuality by including Street’s accident in the pilot episode of the series. In most plots, such an occurrence would be incorporated into the storyline after many episodes, or even seasons, of building up Street and the team. It might even be the climax of the plot. Regardless, this tactic presents a more inclusive diegesis and positions viewers to accept the alternate versions of strength and leadership (Butterworth & Schuck). Instead of dwelling on Street’s injury, the plot focuses on how everyone moves on.
Robert Walton therefore exhibits traditional ideals of masculinity through his tenacity amid trying circumstances, which contribute to his identity. The conventional concepts of masculinity are likewise displayed by Jonathan Harker in the battle between the men and
According to Rotten Tomatoes, consensus reads: Blood-Splattered, emotionally resonant, and white-knuckled intense, The Walking Dead puts an intelligent spin on the overcrowded zombie subgenre.” TV Guide’s Matt Roush called the show “a stark and harrowing survival parable, visually stunning, and daring in its artful use of silence,” and Robert Bianco of USA Today, also praised the direction in which the show was heading stating that the show delivers “edge-of-your-chair tension” and noting, “what separates this fine series from similar shows is the honesty of its human interactions.” The Walking Dead is definitely one of the best tv series, because of the amount of suspense, loyalty, and survival from being eaten by zombies.
Eric Simpson Professor Shannon Walsh Theatre 1020 26 October 2016 The Rant Script Response 1. The setting of Andrew Case’s The Rant, is one that is constantly changing despite the sequence of the play. Although the play doesn’t fade to black to change the setting as seen in most plays you see, the locations and scenery change in front of you without a break in character dialogue.
Jaclyn Seigel Doctor Morales PHM2121 30 April 2015 “The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness” By Michelle Alexander; An Evaluation In “The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Color Blindness” by Michelle Alexander, Alexander explains her opinion on mass incarceration and “The War on Drugs.” Even though “The War on Drugs” took few steps forward to eliminating drug abuse, Michelle Alexander’s book explains how this has created more problems rather than solutions. Alexander focuses on how African American communities have become more vulnerable to the arrests.
Another thing I liked about this documentary is it exposes the judicial system. Nathan’s trial lasted three days, in these three days his defense attorney called no witnesses. With this, Nathans voice was silenced giving him no chance to tell his side of the story and what was happening behind closed doors. This sheds light on the courts because it makes you wonder if they want justice, or do they want to do what “looks good” and guarantee him life in prison. These are some things that I liked about the
For them money symbolizes a better life, even though it can come with problems as well. For instance Carl turns to selling drugs in order to make money, even though he does make a good amount of money it does not do anything to his social class rank, he is still considered to be a thug. Once a family is considered poor, it can be very hard to near impossible for them to change that. There seems to be an endless cycle of poor parents having kids and they never do anything with their life, so they end up being poor as well and this cycle continues. It is important to understand these social themes because they occur in every society and it is up to the society and the individual to try and make a change.
Just like comedy required the audience to react, masculinities do not exist in a vacuum. The humor of the show also guarantees that the masculinities represented are not taken seriously, and that is important for the masses watching the show to consider” (177). The show's ability to display masculinity in many different versions can reinforce, but also undermine one’s pre-determined notion of what masculinity means to themselves. Masculinity isn’t a topic that is well known to be a very certain concrete topic that has no variation from person to person. Given the variation in ideas based around masculinity, How I Met Your Mother can both in reinforcement and undermine masculinity while presented in a fun-loving
In this show, some characters are portrayed as fearless, brutal, troublesome, and are going completely out of their minds. These characters will do whatever is necessary, leaving their morals behind them without even realizing it. Even though this is all true, people that have this mind set, do not give the show a chance. In order for those that believe the show is a controversial program, they need to get past their comfort zone and actually see what they are missing out. Looking past the violence and it being unrealistic the show is fantastic.
Tru is the perfect idea of a women who is both feminine and masculine because has the perfect feminine face and image with a slightly hegemonic masculinity attitude yet feminine characteristics. She completely break the expectations of lesbians as masculine. In the film she is a lesbian in a relationship with a young beautiful woman named Claire, she breaks up with Tru at the beginning of the film because she feel Tru has more growing to do and more importantly she only cares about herself. Society often shows men to be the partner in a heterosexual relationship to have the commitment issues. This would be an example of Tru’s hegemonic masculinity attitude.
There is no place for men who are insecure or lack aggressiveness, and those who fail in their masculinity, such as Lingk, are controlled by others: ‘I can’t negotiate… I don’t have the power’ . Mamet’s characters are formed by the demands of 1980s capitalism, as western society suggests masculinity is tied to professional success, rather than previous social expectations of men, such as physical strength. However, masculinity is still associated with ambition and competitiveness, and this is embodied in Mamet’s work: ‘The qualities needed to be a successful worker are bound to those of the successful man’ . This ‘competition of manhood’ is a recurring motif, everything is a rivalry. ‘Whoever sells the most, gets the most respect, drives the fanciest car, and gets better sales in the future’ ; there is a literal capitalistic competition going on, alongside one of masculinity.
A. Hegemonic Masculinity Hegemony is an umbrella concept regarding domination
Through his psychoanalytic theory the writer respectfully expounds males identify with masculinity by not behaving as their female caretakers act. Mr. Carter based