The will-to-power harmonizes with Nietzsche’s interpretation of the world as becoming, in that it understands concepts and values as having histories of meanings. The meaning of a concept is unstable, and subject to the struggle of dominance between competing interpretations. The imposing of meaning and value on the world is fundamental activity of humans, and Nietzsche understands one’s valuing to be determined by the will-to-power. Thus, anti-natural morality (as well as Nietzsche’s philosophy) is understood to be a product of life’s competing drives. “Life itself forces us to posit values; life itself values through us when we posit values.”
The following paragraphs discuss the main feature of the existentialist view which includes; existence precedes essence, the absurd, facticity, authenticity, the Other and the Look, angst and dread, despair, etc. In addition, Sartre’s Theory will also be discussed whether it is appealing or discouraging. Existence precedes essence: This feature of existentialism simply state that human have to recognize that they are individuals, independently acting and responsible, and conscious beings, rather than fitting themselves in the preconceived categories. Furthermore, individuals must understand that their actual life compose their true essence. Therefore human beings, under their own consciousness create their own values and determine a meaning to their life.
The solution that Sartre offers is that we should force order onto nothingness and describe failure in terms of bad faith and false consciousness. He argues that any person of a serious nature struggles between either the conscious desire for peaceful self-fulfillment through physical actions and social roles or the more pure and raging spontaneity of no thing consciousness. It means we believe that we live within a world that we have planned for or attempt to be free and be in quest of new
One of the major questions within the subject of philosophy centers around the concept of a self, and whether we, as humans, function primarily as individual selves or as one greater, universal or transcendent self. If a true individual self does exist, another secondary question arises regarding freedom and, more specifically, to what extent an individual is free to make choices that determine the remainder of their life. At one extreme of the issue, a person could argue that an individual does not have any freedom whatsoever, and that all the events that occur throughout life are predetermined by some sort of higher being or plan and would, therefore, occur regardless of any choices one could possibly make. At the opposite end of the spectrum
Life is not a journey for happiness. Our life is all about finding meaning. The greatest duty for all persons is to find meaning in his or her life. Essence means the individual real nature of a thing especially as contrasting to its existence. Existence means reality as presented in experience.
Another factor that helped me to complete my goals was a desire for approval from others and longing for success. Self-identity can be changing at all times. As individuals gain knowledge, their perspectives on life change and transform into new realizations that result in new outlooks that may cause their values and beliefs to change. If an individual is at peace with full understanding of self-identity, their life would not have much meaning. For instance, if every human knew exactly who they were, then there would be little to no room for self-discovery and growth.
Sartre brings up a lot of different topics in his writing, but they all relate to the main idea of existentialism. Existentialism is that it is up to us to find our purpose or our essence by being authentic to our own nature. Existentialism says that existence precedes essence, so we are born first and it is up to us to find our purpose in the world. Self-deception and psychoanalysis is the ability to lie oneself and to others to create positive reinforcement to oneself. Sartre also writes about being-in-the-world and taking up a role that affects our freedom.
It also emphasises the fact that all life experiences are significant and will influence you later in life (Carducci, 2009). A weakness of this theory is that Erikson suggests that one should conform within society instead of having individual choices and ideas according to Carducci (2009). Another weakness is that Erikson states that one needs to develop an identity of oneself but within the boundaries of what is considered as acceptable by society and anything else is seen as a negative identity (Carducci,
we are responsible for doing what we can to cultivate our strengths and manage our vulnerabilities. • The fact is that there are certain things in life we are responsible for, and many that we are not. The secret is to discover the delicate balance between fate and responsibility without turning down relative freedom to become who we wish. • fate is different from destiny . Fate refers to the givens of life, those aspects of existence that are undisputable, unstoppable and unavoidable, and over which we have no control.
A few systems are extremely hypothetical and philosophical and are contending about the way of learning itself, or the way of life and other profound things. Different approaches are common to the point that they don't have to be composed about much as the world everywhere acknowledges for instance that the exploratory approach is the same all over and under every situation. Subjective examination is the technique typically associated with the social constructivist standard which emphasizes the socially constructed nature of reality. It is about recording, inspecting and trying to uncover the deeper essentialness and enormity of human lead and experience, including clashing feelings, practices and sentiments. Masters are more into obtaining