Lacks’ Cells Alive for Medical Industry Benefits The story of Henrietta Lacks in this reading is fascinating. By using Ms. Lacks’ cells, medical science has developed many cures. By one woman contributing her cells decades ago without her knowledge, on an involuntary basis, the impact has become mind-boggling. At the same time, it is disheartening and shaming to know that Henrietta’s family was unable to pay for medical attention for her. Henrietta Lacks contributed to science but received nothing in return. Lacks was paying public contributions to the advancement of medicine and science, but health professionals used a human being as a patient and experimented with her cells without asking permission for the sake of such medical advances to …show more content…
Lacks’ family and the university violated the privacy of Ms. Lacks. The healthcare professionals violated the privacy of this patient because she was uneducated, poor, and nonwhite, which created a debate about the issues of health privacy in the medical records of patients in the health care system in America to this day. First, the health professionals failed to comply with the privacy of the patient because the patient was uneducated. When Henrietta’s cells were taken, she did not have any knowledge that the doctor took the sample of her cells. As Deborah, Henrietta’s daughter says, “They took Henrietta Lacks’ cells and kept it from us for 20+ years. They say, ‘Donated.’ No No No! Robbed! Myself nor my father have not signed any paper…” From this example, Henrietta Lacks’ cells were not given voluntarily. They were not donated to the hospital or doctor or researcher, this is evidence of violation of patient’s privacy. Ms. Lacks’ cells were not just kept it in the laboratory at Johns Hopkins University, but her cells were sent to various labs outside the university for the sake of scientific advancement. Even if Henrietta had been approached, given explanation and had given her legal signature that she was willing to donate her cells, her cells were …show more content…
When a researcher from the National Cancer Institute was visiting a friend, Bobbette, who was the wife of one of Henrietta’s oldest son’s. He asked her last name and excitedly asked her if she was related to Henrietta Lacks. He told her about Henrietta Lacks, and Bobbette ran to tell the family that Henrietta was still alive. The researcher or anyone else in the medical field was not supposed to tell or ask anyone including relatives about Henrietta’s medical records. This describes the issue of violation of privacy to access personal information from medical records. The professional health workers took Henrietta’s cells from her cervical area, utilizing her body for the sake of science. It was violation and a crime. Because of these issues, it has raised the concern about hospital administrators following privacy protocol to this day. This should not have been done by medical staff, especially professionals to keep her information confidential, with no public access to her records. This is why her privacy was made public and violated in the way the university used her information in such a dehumanizing way while they made millions even billions of dollars of profit off of her information. Because of Henrietta’s case, medical professionals and staff need to be trained to keep all patient’s information confidential. Ms. Lacks’ case regarding her cells being taken is a story that is still alive
Henrietta and her family’s rights were further violated when researchers published Henrietta Lacks’s medical records and even the family’s genetic information. This also would go on to have profound effect on Henrietta’s daughter,
Henrietta Lacks John Moore was a leukemia patient that died at the age of 56 years old. He had his spleen removed because with the infection the doctor was worried that it was going to explode. Once his spleen was removed the tissue was then used in research by Dr. David Golde a researcher for UCLA (John Moors, 56; Sued to Share Profits from His Cells). John was never told about the research being done on his tissues, he was just asked by Dr. Golde to return to the UCLA medical center for follow up checkups, where doctors would take blood every time and still never mentioned anything about research to John.
Not only would her cells be important, but also, these cancer cells would cause her family to go through many challenges. Though Henrietta’s might have not been and important person while being alive. She & her family live through her reproducing cancer cells that continue to create advancements in the medical field. Mrs. Lacks “showed up at Hopkins complaining
Henrietta Lacks did not know that a tissue sample had been taken from her cervix, but the turning point in medical ethics was when researchers started injecting patients with cancer cells without their consent, so they could see how cancer spreads. After that, the government institutionalized medical review boards and informed consent laws. By law, informed consent means that the patient knows that the study involves research, the purpose of the research, the duration of their participation, procedure,
In this sad tragedy “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” Henrietta signed a consent form to give permission to the staff of the John Hopkins Hospital to perform surgical procedures under anesthesia and while she was passed out the doctors cut out a piece of her tumor without informing her. My opinion on all of this is that the she signed a form where it lets the doctors do any procedures that are necessary in helping Henrietta get better however the doctors did get a little carry away with picking at her brain and I could see why the family was upset, but they probably have a good reason why they didn’t. Most people would argue that Gey and Ta Linda was in the rights to explore Henrietta tumor and take a chunk of it for research
First of all, Henrietta was an African American woman at the time when there was still inequality and segregation towards African Americans. This was really evident when she went in for her checkups at Hopkins and how she was never asked for her consent with her cell tissue. Also, the medical treatments at that time were not very safe or effective. An example would be when they used radium to try and treat her cervical cancer. Little did they know that radium destroys any cells it touches and it can also cause cancer.
The topic and history of medical ethics has consistently been a strongly debated issue. With numerous case-specific situations concerning as well as qualifying the matter, perhaps one of the most influential and debatable stories may be that of Henrietta Lacks. With non consensual tissue samples taken, unauthorized distribution of her cells, and seemingly careless radiation treatment for cervical cancer, it might be fair to adjudicate that the lack of ethical practice was apparent and almost even fatal. In the case study of Sofia (“Ethics in The Medical Field:
In the 1950s the first ‘immortal’ human cells were grown from a cancerous tissue sample taken from Henrietta Lacks, a poor black woman, without her knowledge or consent. She had died shortly after, at the unfortunately early age of 31, of a severe case of cervical cancer. Henrietta had a list of ailments that included neurosyphilis, gonorrhea, and HPV the leading cause of her cervical cancer and, ultimately, her death. The hospital that had diagnosed her cancer, Johns Hopkins, had supposedly been one of the best hospitals in the country, but it participated in discriminatory and amoral research practices when treating African Americans. Not only taking taking Henrietta’s cells without her consent, but injecting them and other cancer cells into patients without their knowledge.
The third main point of the body of the essay is the impact of HeLa cells on modern medicine. Skloot demonstrates the pioneering research and medical advancements made possible by Henrietta's cells, from the development of the polio vaccine to cancer research and beyond. However, she also emphasizes the continued ethical responsibility and awareness necessary when dealing with the use of human tissue in medical
My Tissue or Your Tissue? Where have the ethics gone in medicine today? Rebecca Skloot’s novel, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks discusses the life and influence of Henrietta Lacks within the medical community. Henrietta Lacks was an African American tobacco farmer from Clover, Virginia, whose cells were wrongly stolen from her without her knowledge or consent in 1951. Cells that would inevitably become the world’s first immortal cell line, thus transforming modern medicine forever.
The issue of privacy has been one dating back to the beginning of society. In order to protect it we have erected walls around us and called them homes, fences and called them territories, borders and called them countries. As the modern day arrived, society innovated to the point that ownership and privacy are no longer clear. Science has developed at a rate where morals and laws cannot keep up, more specifically, in the medical department. Such a problem is detailed in Rebecca Skloot’s book The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks.
Herded onto slave ships, forced into labor, and treated lower than animals, 12.5 million Africans were brought to the New World between 1525 and 1866 and became the foundation of the United States, a country now based on liberty and justice for all. Just because America is a beacon of hope and a symbol of equality in the 21st century, its roots in slavery are not morally justified by its current state. Similarly, Henrietta Lacks’ violation of autonomy at Johns Hopkins may have been accepted back then, but it does not make violating her autonomy any more morally correct. Despite the monumental advances in science that stemmed from Henrietta Lacks’ cancer cells, the violation of Henrietta’s autonomy and the hardships she and her family faced
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks tells the story of Henrietta, an African-American woman whose cells were used to create the first immortal human cell line. Told through the eyes of her daughter, Deborah Lacks, aided by journalist Rebecca Skloot. Deborah wanted to learn about her mother, and to understand how the unauthorized harvesting of Lacks cancerous cells in 1951 led to unprecedented medical breakthroughs, changing countless lives and the face of medicine forever. It is a story of medical arrogance and triumph, race, poverty and deep friendship between the unlikeliest people. There had been many books published about Henrietta’s cells, but nothing about Henrietta’s personality, experiences, feeling, life style etc.
These ethical issues can further be explored and analyzed, which is the purpose of this paper, through modern day scientific ethics. First of all, who was Henrietta Lacks and what
What are the specific issues raised in the book—legally and ethically? Think about the 1980s John Moore case: the appeal court decision and its reversal by the California Supreme Court. Issues that raised in the book are race issues, the legality of taking adventage of patients who’s family aren’t able to fight for the rights and benefit of their cells. According to California supreme court, Under the duty to obtain informed consent, “a doctor must disclose his intent in using a patient for research and economic gain.” 6.