ipl-logo

Henry David Thoreau: Disobeying The Law

153 Words1 Page

Thoreau had excellent ideas; however, his ideas are radical to both his time period and today. Disobeying the law is frowned upon by most societies, but some people are similar to Thoreau and deem that there is nothing wrong with forms of peaceful protest. While it is important that every individual follow his or her own conscience, it can only be obeyed completely freely to a certain point. One’s conscience might tell them that they should not pay their taxes, when another’s does not; this is why laws are established. If one does not abide by a law, there are consequences because they followed their conscience. Laws are made to be just and to appeal to most consciences, therefore they should be followed. People who do not agree with such laws

Show More
Related

  • Letter From Birmingham Jail Rhetorical Analysis

    1268 Words  | 6 Pages

    “Unjust laws exist: Shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them” (Thoreau 945, par.16). Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. had written about resisting an unjust government in his piece, “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. In his essay “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience,” Henry David Thoreau also discusses the right and responsibility to resist an unjust government. Since King and Thoreau both use current events in their time as examples of injustice, use historical and biblical references, how they can’t wait any longer to make a change, both provide strong arguments on how important it is to stand up against the injustice put upon American people by the government; however, King and Thoreau were inspired to write by different causes

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Grapes Of Wrath And Civil Disobedience

    882 Words  | 4 Pages

    The two authors discuss different societal circumstances in their works, which is why these views clash. In addition, the encouragement of rebellion is another differing view. Thoreau supports the right to rebel if one disagrees with the law or finds it unjust. He accurately claims that “unjust laws exist,” but then prompts the reader by asking if society will “be

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Thoreau And Steinbeck's Ideals For Government

    943 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the society Steinbeck describes, if one were to disobey the rules, he “had no place in any world, no matter where created” (Steinbeck 266). Even though the families had rights, they seemingly did not have the right to protest if they believed a law was unjust. Because of this, the rulers of this society have all of the power. Individuals have to keep their own beliefs private and must adhere to society’s rules, not matter if they were right or wrong, in fear of being shamed. Comparatively, the very foundation of Thoreau’s beliefs is that humans have the right to rebel against a corrupt state.

    Read More

  • Thoreau And Gandhi Disobeying Wrongful Laws

    61 Words  | 1 Pages

    Both Thoreau and Gandhi faced the consequences of disobeying wrongful laws. Americans in the 1900s disregarded Prohibition because it took their rights away. Hoping if many people continue to break the same law, the government may realize that the rule is flawed. The overall respect for law is still present and once again, it is completely acceptable to break unjust laws.

    Read More

  • Martin Luther King Comparison Essay

    1564 Words  | 7 Pages

    Thoreau mentions it too, “..bt if it is of such nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then I say break the law” (Thoreau 6). They both encourage the individual to break the law if they believe it is unjust, there is nothing wrong with breaking the law if following would hurt you, the individual has the right to not follow any injustice. Both King and Thoreau want to end social injustice to improve the world. It is the responsibility of the individual to resist injustice since the government acts unjust due to the lack virtue, morality, and stamina from its people and leader. Although the government is filled with injustice Thoreau and King have hope that one day one individual will put an end to social

    Read More

  • Thoreau On Civil Disobedience

    1359 Words  | 6 Pages

    Thoreau protests in an active way on the one hand, since he renounces the government’s law of taxation, but he does so in a non violent manner. This is precisely why the essay is called “Civil Disobedience”. Libertarianism, hence, advocates individuals to be just towards themselves and towards others by not harming them, to be active by living life consciously, and lastly, it advocates free will versus determinism, since people are free to make their own decisions which are based on their own personal sets of beliefs; “a wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance, nor wish it to prevail through the power of the majority”. (page 777) In an imaginary society where people would simply confirm to the government’s rules and laws without taking any stand, one could argue that those individuals have no free will and therefore are deterministically bound to obey the government.

    Read More

  • Civil Disobedience: Documents Of Freedom

    800 Words  | 4 Pages

    The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right.” This is and was an example to the people of America because this shows us that we need to choose what is right. This all relates correspondingly to civil disobedience, because these people spoke out to stand up for what is morally right and to make a point to America, and that it was their obligation to put America’s best interests first. Thoreau wanted to make a powerful statement and stand-up for what he believed was deserved, he believed paying the poll tax was wrong and he wouldn’t do it because he did not believe in it. The King Center Archive said that he believed citizens “ought deliberately to break laws that conflict with their moral

    Read More

  • Thoreau's Civil Disobedience

    170 Words  | 1 Pages

    The reason why Thoreau wrote this section of the Civil Disobedience is because Thoreau believes that a person must stand on what they think is right. Example is when Thoreau states that the only obligation that he has is to do at any time what he thinks is right also saying that he thinks that a person must be a man first then become a subject. But the most important thing that Thoreau did to support his ideas was to protest the Mexican American war by not paying his taxes. He did what he thought was right he stood by his word. His protest didn't stop the war but it had more of a symbolistic impact.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Antigone

    765 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Men generally, under such a government as this, think that they ought to wait until they have persuaded the majority to alter them.” Thoreau claims that the men should wait and get more men to go against the law and stop paying taxes to raise awareness that the law is

    Read More

  • Thoreau's Civil Disobedience

    193 Words  | 1 Pages

    “The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right” This is a quote from Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience”, he being a Transcendentalist held true to his belief; one being all humans are born with the unchallengeable moral truth within, and did not need outside influences to make the right decision pertaining to the business of life. I feel the quote hold true meaning to one’s inner thought; that they are only obligated to be true to themselves morally and in turn based on their perception to do the right thing concerning to any giving situation. With the concept of Civil Disobedience, I should not be made to follow a law or form of government, which is not for the people and in principle morally

    Read More

  • Civil Disobedience Is Wrong Essay

    798 Words  | 4 Pages

    Therefore, it brings up the question as to how civil disobedience can be tolerated if it involves ignoring or breaking a law. The foundation of the United States is embedded in laws. The First Amendment provides for the right to assemble, which Thoreau clearly advocates in his essay. “If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go, let it go: perchance it will wear smooth--certainly the machine will wear out… but if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then I say, break the law. Let your life be a counter-friction to stop the machine.

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of Civil Disobedience By Thoreau

    422 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout history there have been many political changes that are either supported, or not, by citizens. In the given passage from, "Civil Disobedience," by Thoreau, a perspective of disagreeing with the government ways, is provided. Thoreau explains how a government should be in comparison to how it really is by utilizing his words to set the tone and mode, imagery to achieve his audience's understanding, and diction to make his writing scholarly. Although tone and mode are not directly stated, you can infer that Thoreau meant for his writing to be taken as serious and powerful. His implementation of words such as, "inexpedient," "execute," " integrity," and "command," makes one think about their lawful rights and reflect on what rights are supported or

    Read More

  • Thoreau's Influence On Civil Disobedience

    1267 Words  | 6 Pages

    It was not until the 20th century, most notably Gandhi and Martin Luther King, where Thoreau’s idea of civil disobedience came alive. His theory was espoused by the liberal and social progressive movement; most notably the Civil Rights

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Civil Disobedience

    445 Words  | 2 Pages

    In his essay, “Civil Disobedience,” Henry David Thoreau uses rhetorical questions and many dehumanizing analogies to elicit an emotional reaction from his readers and urge them to carefully consider their relationship with the law. Firstly, he considers the correlation between man and law, and supplies the audience with many thought-provoking questions such as: “Why has every man a conscience, then?” The use of these questions inspires self-reflection within the reader and causes them to rethink their present beliefs. Because the questions primarily focus on the morals associated with lawmaking, Thoreau also adds an emotional appeal to his essay—everyone wants to do the right thing and will therefore be more connected to his argument.

    Read More

  • Thoreau's Arguments Against Civil Disobedience

    698 Words  | 3 Pages

    Peaceful resistance is a necessity and an integral part of a society because without the ability to peacefully resist the society is not truly free. The use of peaceful resistance has been a common way of expressing a person or group of peoples ideals since Henry David Thoreau wrote his essay called Civil Disobedience in 1849. Thoreau was a famous American writer and philosopher, and the essay talks of how he believes people need to put one’s morals and ideas over laws they may find unjust (Saxby). This is the basis and definition of what peaceful resistance is. The United States Constitution puts emphasis on the individual and if an individual believes in an ideal that goes against a law, they should be able to peacefully resist, especially

    Read More

More about Henry David Thoreau: Disobeying The Law

Open Document