I chose this quote because of the meaning behind it and the truth to it. When Thoreau says this he is backing up his stance that a man should put his conscience first and follow his own path above anything else. Suppose you have a lily that you want to plant and grow. Lilies should be kept in full and ample sunlight, be watered freely during the spring and summer months, and be trimmed occasionally. If you don’t water the flower, keep it in the dark, or don’t take care of it, it will die. If the lily is not able to grow based on how it is supposed to grow because someone is restricting it, then it will die. Thoreau compares this to people. He believes that if people allow themselves to be restricted by government, or rules that they disagree with, they will die. …show more content…
However, to me most of them hold little to no value. They have all been said before, and they all use common, meaningless words. They aren’t thought provoking. When I read a quote I want to have to think about what it means; which is exactly what Thoreau’s quote does. Added to this, the quote has a personal meaning to me. For most if not all of my childhood life I spent the majority of my time trying to be like other people. Especially with other girls I was friends with. I would like something they did or wore, and I would do exactly that without any question. Over time, I didn’t really know who I was. I knew my values and my morals that I wanted to stick to, but if someone asked me what my favorite food was, I couldn’t tell you. I would sit there racking my brain thinking of what someone ELSE’S favorite food was because I wanted to be like them. Take it from me, Thoreau is right. Living as someone else isn’t living at all. However, now I can tell you my favorite food is spaghetti. I could eat it every day of my life. When I came across this quote I promised to live by who I am no matter what. This is why I love the meaning and thought behind this quote, and also
’’ Thoreau would rather go to jail then to argue to the power of the government. Henry also stated, “The states is not armed with superior wit or honesty, but with superior physical strength. I was not born to be forced. I will breathe after my own fashion.
“While I enjoy the friendship of the seasons I trust that nothing can make life a burden to me. The gentle rain which waters my beans and keeps me in the house today is not drear and melancholy, but good for me too. ”He compares Mother Nature with humans throughout the chapter, saying that mother nature provides thousand wonderful, beautiful, and interesting things, and fellow human beings seem to be interested in only what they can get out of you and who offer little in exchange. Thoreau feels that, rather than being near the greatest number of people, people must live and work in the place most important to their various
Thoreau starts his essay by condemning his fellow countrymen’s actions, or rather, inaction. They and Thoreau share similar moral beliefs, but they refuse to take any action towards them. “Must the citizen ever for a moment, or
" Thoreau is stating how if you want to achieve something you should accomplish it largely on your own and not to just depend on somebody else to give you your success. Thoreau’s writing and Fifth Harmony’s chorus in the song “Who Are You” are very similar as they both point out how relying on yourself can get you much further than if you depend on someone
Henry David Thoreau was a philosopher, poet, and a very outspoken person about society. He discusses his opinions on how people should live in his essay “Where I Lived and What I Lived For.” Thoreau's philosophy of simplicity and individualism and self-sufficiency poses many dangers for communities as a whole. Although there are many setbacks, his philosophy is, however, still viable today. Thoreau strongly advocates self-sufficiency and individualism in this essay.
Throughout history there have been many political changes that are either supported, or not, by citizens. In the given passage from, "Civil Disobedience," by Thoreau, a perspective of disagreeing with the government ways, is provided. Thoreau explains how a government should be in comparison to how it really is by utilizing his words to set the tone and mode, imagery to achieve his audience's understanding, and diction to make his writing scholarly. Although tone and mode are not directly stated, you can infer that Thoreau meant for his writing to be taken as serious and powerful. His implementation of words such as, "inexpedient," "execute," " integrity," and "command," makes one think about their lawful rights and reflect on what rights are supported or
Throughout the writing of “Civil Disobedience,” Thoreau often referred back to his idea that he supported which was “That government is best which governs not at all.” (Thoreau) In the passage, Thoreau believed that the government does not have a conscience. He talked about not wanting to pay the government poll tax, which in result, caused him to be thrown into jail. A poll tax is just a tax on a person for existing, therefore, everyone had to pay the same amount regardless of the value of their possessions.
Another compelling argument in "Civil Disobedience" is when Thoreau uses logos as a tool to compare his idea to an acclaimed scholar of the time, Paley. Instead of avoiding Paley 's popular argument altogether, he takes advantage of his argument and flips it to support his point. Not only does he provide sound reasoning for his opposing views, but he provides an example for which most people can relate: "If I have unjustly wrested a plank from a drowning man, I must restore it to him though I drown myself. This, according to Paley, would be inconvenient" (Thoreau). The simplicity of Thoreau 's words here serve to his advantage, as those with less political experience can connect with this straightforward, concise
When you don 't have to worry about a little problem than most people would take it as life is already hard so if you can take a problem away that’s better. Accordingly, the rhetorical device Thoreau plugged in “I wanted to live deep and suck out all the marrow of life, to live so sturdily” such as a metaphor of life and as if he wanted to devour the world
I think that Thoreau means when he says, "The surface of the earth is soft and impressible by the feet of men; and so with the paths which the mind travels?" is that people are too often stuck in reality. I believe that he is trying to say that individuals need to be themselves and stop worrying about what society thinks of them. Thoreau is telling people to make their own paths of life and strive on what they think is true and base their live on their own hopes and dreams. Henry David Thoreau’s message in the final paragraph is stating that our lives are based off of perspective. Everything we see is through the idea of perspective.
Mr. Thoreau argues that people should not allow any government to control or atrophy their thoughts or beliefs. Mr. Thoreau was an also remained a devoted abolitionist and has written
This quote is representative of Thoreau’s beliefs on how money and luxury can ruin a simplistic life or in a more current definition if there is more money and luxury, there will be more problems with living an easy and simplistic life. In this day and age, this quote is slightly controversial in the matters of more luxury being worse on the easiness of life since in this age luxury people have been made to simplify life.
Thoreau emphasizes living simply by reducing the excess in our live to only the bare essentials, and relying on oneself to do so. Thoreau claims that the only way to
Thoreau is trying to say that each individual person is programmed differently. He is absolutely correct in regards to the fact that everyone wants to live their live different then their companions. Not everyone wants to be the exact occupation when they are older or people do not live exactly the same, which ultimately makes us humans. Humans are individual molded by a greater being, God in my religion, to be different. So it just makes sense that each individual has different aspirations and different actions to obtain them.
Thoreau addresses a largely overlooked issue in American society, people tend to live with excess when the fewer we have as people is better for us. The author argues that people need to live in the fewer things and value what the world has to offer us. In today’s society this is a very valid point, millennials do not care about our world on a spiritual level when it is the thing we can connect ourselves to the most. Thoreau’s claim in Where I lived and what I lived for was that we live life too fast, in today’s society this claim is relevant.