For centuries, some of the best writers and scholars in the world have look to nature for inspiration, guidance, and a chance to find answer to life’s most difficult questions. This response paper will cover how the word ‘nature’ is used to describe and convey a message of supporting the spread of intellectual ideas by American writers. Excerpts from a literary letter titled The American Scholar written by Henry David Thoreau will be used as supporting evidence for claims stated in this essay. The letter is addressed to President Martin Van Buren who won the election in 1836 and the contents inside expresses Thoreau's concerns and wishes about expanding American literary ideas into the world. Thoreau uses nature to explain why he thinks a scholarly culture in the United States is essential to the country’s intellectual development. One of the first stances Thoreau uses the term nature is seen in the first main idea of the letter. Thoreau argues that nature is instrumentally important to writers and scholars because one’s natural environment inspires intellectual ideas. The transcendentalist specifically said, “Ever the winds blow; ever the grass grows. Every day, men and women, conversing, beholding and beholden.The scholar must needs …show more content…
Base on the quote, people do not follow the laws of nature, but rather man create their own rules for personal gain. Private usage such as places to sleep, eat, aesthetic views, and wasteful dumping grounds are only some examples for why people would want additional land. Also, the quote seemingly implies that Thoreau supports the idea of manifest destiny because nature is an abundant resource for human to use. After discussing the importance of nature to the United State's economic development, Thoreau returns to addressing the need for expanding and spreading intellectuals’ ideas within the
“While I enjoy the friendship of the seasons I trust that nothing can make life a burden to me. The gentle rain which waters my beans and keeps me in the house today is not drear and melancholy, but good for me too. ”He compares Mother Nature with humans throughout the chapter, saying that mother nature provides thousand wonderful, beautiful, and interesting things, and fellow human beings seem to be interested in only what they can get out of you and who offer little in exchange. Thoreau feels that, rather than being near the greatest number of people, people must live and work in the place most important to their various
Thoreau starts his essay by condemning his fellow countrymen’s actions, or rather, inaction. They and Thoreau share similar moral beliefs, but they refuse to take any action towards them. “Must the citizen ever for a moment, or
At this point in the narrative he tells readers about an experience he had while observing a woodchuck in the woods while on a walk. He then tells in detail how he wanted to eat this woodchuck in a brutal way. This thought process he was having while observing this animal brought him a better understanding that human beings still have a wild instinct inside of themselves. Which he respected the idea and acknowledged that these instincts still occurred within himself. This experience supported Thoreau belief that hunting/obtaining knowledge on nature was important at an early age.
For years, man and nature have coexisted in harmony, but in recent years, man and nature have become increasingly disconnected, as air conditioning, GMO’s, and other innovations have been made to combat the natural way of life. Some people, such as Christopher McCandless, wish to be one with nature again. As his journey into the Alaskan wilderness proved, nature and man have a glorious and close, but sometimes the unforgiving and hostile relationship, as some men admire nature, but nature is not forgiving of simple mistakes as some minor misdoings can seal one’s fate. This is proven in Jon Krakauer’s novel, Into the Wild, as nature was unforgiving of Christopher’s mistakes while attempting to survive in the Alaskan wilderness. This relationship
For example ,the biography ,”henry david thoreau” states ,”published in 1854 walden;or life in the woods , promoted living a life close to nature. This evidence shows that thoreau wrote about nature because He
Thoreau argued that “apple emulates man's independence and enterprise,” meaning that nature was what gave people individuality and self identity (Wild Apples 1). This proved that humans needed to go back to nature because it was the only way to withstand the corrupted thoughts of society. He stated that “even the sourest and crabbedest apple, growing in the most unfavorable position, suggests such thoughts as these, it is so noble a fruit,” displaying how nature can cure anything and even those who have been corrupted by society. Thoreau
When Thoreau mentions that many philosopher import the woods to themselves, it must be for a reason. The woods and nature are needed in life, or human life may perish without
3rd Quote that supports the Topic Sentence: “The authority of government, even such as I am willing to submit to- for I will cheerfully obey those who know and can do better than I, and in many things even those who neither know nor can do so well- is still an impure one: to be strictly just, it must have the sanction and consent of the governed. It can have no pure right over my person and property but what I concede to it.” (13) EXPLANATION of 3rd Quote: Thoreau will listen to the government as long as it is just to everyone. It cannot have any right over his body and property, but what he surrenders to it. INTRO TO Research That Supports/Helps Explain
Thoreau wants to emphasize that the Government needed to change. He does this through an aphorism; “I HEARTILY accept the motto, That government is best which governs least". This motto in Thoreau’s case, is saying that if the Government wants to improve, it needs to take
The bold and brash approach on life by transcendentalists was truly an ambitious lifestyle. Such individuals like Henry David Thoreau, Chris McCandless, and Jon Krakauer have renounced all of their mainstream agendas to lead a more fundamental life, but not without the criticism other have faced. The actions portrayed in their novels demonstrate how important it is to incorporate others’ ideas when one’s own choices. As the world was in the midst of transforming, Henry David Thoreau yearned to yield away from the evolving world, as he considered them corrupt opportunists who are deprived of their true nature.
American philosopher Henry David Thoreau stated, that “The Price of anything is the amount of time you exchange for it.” People throughout the world have begun to question whether his statement is accurate or not. Upon looking farther at his statement, it is concluded that he is, in fact correct. If you look around you can see proof and instances that support his claim. You just have to look through a wide view.
Mr. Thoreau argues that people should not allow any government to control or atrophy their thoughts or beliefs. Mr. Thoreau was an also remained a devoted abolitionist and has written
Individuals lay the foundation of America. The Founding Fathers of this unique nation broke their allegiance with Great Britain to create an improved governing body. They desired an individual-centered authority as opposed to Britain’s monarchy, which ruled with tyranny. These Founding Fathers experienced a neglectful democratic monarchy that cared little about the ethical treatment of its people. The domineering actions of Britain challenged these historic individuals to form a new cultural identity.
You can’t walk in the woods and see a leaf that doesn’t quite know if it wants to fall to the ground or stay on the tree. Thoreau noticed this, and thought that if people could be decisive in the same way that nature was, then they could “live deep and suck out all the marrow of life… live so sturdily and Spartan-like as to put as to put to rout all that was not life… cut a broad swath and shave close, to drive life into a corner…” (Walden 771) This is something that Thoreau highly valued. He wanted to live as his own person, which was, in his mind, best accomplished by living in nature and not being involved with the government.
Having described the main characteristics of both, Emerson and Thoreau, at this point is significant to contextualize the texts “Self-reliance” (1841) and the second chapter of “Walden” (1854) to analyze the figurative language the authors