In the late 1920s, an eminent group of social scientists was commissioned, in what came to be known as the Payne Fund studies, to examine film’s effects on youth. One of the most widely cited volumes in this research was Herbert Blumer 's (1932) Movies and Conduct. The 12 Payne Fund volumes stand as a model of how to study the behavioral effects of media. The 1933 Payne Fund studies—twelve volumes of research conducted by the most prominent psychologists, sociologists, and educators of the time—represent a detailed look at the effects of film on such diverse topics as sleep patterns, knowledge about foreign cultures, attitudes about violence, and delinquent behavior. These studies have not been cited much in the last 25 years, despite the …show more content…
Reinforce what exists (no change)
6. Prevent change We also need to think about behavior making onvera1 different time scales. The first time scale is the frequency of exposure to the message. Moreover, the effects of media on behavior can themselves be either transitory (lasting a short time, such as only during or shortly after exposure, as when you buy a new brand of toothpaste after seeing an ad for the new product), or persistent, lasting a long time. Figure 10.1. A typology of media effects: Effect can be located on two dimensions, that of time span and that of intentionality.
SOURCE: McQuail, 1994, P. 336. Reprinted with permission.
MODELS OF BEHAVIOR MAKING To understand how media affect behavior, too, requires that we specify the mechanisms by which media may have effects. For the individual, the minimal model for behavioral effects assumes a stimulus, a receiver, and a response. This is the familiar stimulus-response model of the psychologist:
Stimulus Message —> Individual Receiver —>
…show more content…
It is often called either the bullet theory or direct effects theory of media influence. This unelaborated model of media effects argued essentially that media messages directly influence audiences’ behavior. It is this model that represents the underlying fear of critics of mass media during the first third of this century, that is, that media messages can have a direct influence on the mass of the audience. Over the years, much media research has gone into elaborating and correcting this model. First, it was noted that different people responded differently to the same messages. This phenomenon led to the development of theories about individual differences in media effects on behavior, and the assertion that some people may be more susceptible to the influence of media
For instance, Internet connection and a great assortment of modern technologies give us a choice to select individually what our minds will be filled with. Hence, it has been estimated that an overall percentage of TV watchers has significantly decreased. Therefore, I consider that media’s impact is less significant than it used to be as people themselves select the material they want to receive. Therefore, it challenges the validity of the argument in times of easily accessible Internet.
In “Violent Media Is Good for Kids”, written by Gerard Jones, the author argues that violent entertainments have positive effects on children’s lives beyond their violence and juvenility. In his article, Jones uses a cause and result relationship between violent media and their importance to inform the positive impact of violent media. In addition to informing, Jones tries to persuade parents, teachers, psychologists, and others who are skeptical of the importance of violent media by giving evidence from his own life story and from his research. Furthermore, by informing and by persuading his readers, Jones encourages his readers to experience the significant part of violent entertainments. Even though Jones purpose is to convince about the
Research to date, however, casts doubt on the validity of
A different quote in this article states “The news media is extremely powerful, and that it can inject particular points of view into its audience. At the other extreme, scholars have contended that the media has minimal effects on individuals because of various mediating conditions, including their selective exposure to media they find congenial to their views, selective perception in accordance with preexisting
The main objectives in chapter 9 include the ways media attempt to influence people’s attitudes, beliefs, and/or behavior, ways media technology can be disruptive and have adverse effects on behavior, the positive and negative influences of certain kinds of media, such as advertisements or reality television programs, on self-image. Even though media is a great outlet, media has changed our generation causing effects on self-image and human interactions. Because of its pervasiveness in American culture, the media affects people in both obvious and subtle ways. Modern media comes in many different formats, including newspapers, magazines, television, social media, etc.
The strength and effects of mass media are expressed perfectly in Denis McQuail’s article “The Influence and Effects of Mass Media.” McQuail does not really focus on the educational spectrum of mass media like Lunsford. Instead he tries to provide useful information about how mass media effects society as a whole and how there can be power gained from ownership of mass media. Instead of just thinking of mass media as a website that teenagers get on to post what they are eating for lunch or what they had to do that day, McQuail looks deeper and writes about how mass media can lead to political and economic power. One example from his article is when he writes about how mass media “can attract and direct attention to problems, solutions or people” and can also be useful in the forms of “persuasion and mobilization.”
Mass media can have an effect on a person perception. It can change the way a person thinks or acts toward other people. Watching a particular movie or a television show can allow people to create assumptions about a certain group of people. Stereotypes are shown through the media in race, gender and social classes (Croteau 192). The people from the Middle East are one particular example of a race that is that is depicted in a negative light.
Protecting children from exploring their fantasies and desires inhibits them from realizing their potential. In this essay, there are counterarguments which oppose the perspective of Jones. One of these arguments is by pop culture psychologists who argue that violent entertainment is harmful to kids. Similarly Savage (2004) counters Jones work by concluding that violent media encourages or correlates to violent behaviors.
According to Baran (2012) mass communication can be defined as “the process of creating shared meaning between the mass media and their audiences.” This essay aims to discuss the degree to which we are shaped by our interaction with the media. In order to achieve the aforementioned aim of this essay I will focus on the following: limited-effects theory, two-step flow theory, attitude change theory and agenda setting. The limited effects theory sets out that media influence is based on individual and social characteristics.
There are many studies on media violence and its social effects. Most of the studies have indicated that children who are exposed to media violence are more likely to exhibit violent and aggressive behaviors. As the child observes the violence, he/she is motivated by the fact that the show is enjoyable without realizing the violent behaviors. As a result, they copy and identify the behavior, and this has detrimental effects on their social life. According to Boxer et al., the content of the media has a direct impact on its audiences (420).
As television watching increased severely over the past half-century, it also became more violent. In 1969 the National Commission on the causes and prevention of violence indicated that ‘The preponderance of the available research evidence strongly suggests…that violence in television programs can and does have adverse effects upon audiences’ (cited in Berkowitz, 1993, p.199.) Since that time, television violence has increased largely. Research reports in 1970, published that children has seen over 11,000 murders on television by the age of 14. More recent researches and reports have demonstrated that now, the average child sees more than 100,000 violent crimes on television every year and about 200,000 crimes when they reach their teens.
Media are platforms of mass communication that can be categorized as either new of traditional media, with new media being forms of communication that make use of technologies such as the Internet, and traditional media being more conventional forms of media such as newspapers. Media, primarily new media, is getting more popular and influential, especially in today’s day and age since we are exposed to it a lot more than in the past and also since media is more easily accessible now. The media can shape our behaviours, perceptions and opinions, and it is important to know how people are influenced and impacted by it. The media can influence someone’s perception of social reality, or perceptions of beauty or even influence people’s behaviours and habits and therefore, the media does shape who we are. One way that the media can shape who we are is by influencing our perception of social reality.
The Uses Approach of this theory assumes that the viewers or the audiences are active and willingly expose themselves to media and that the most potent of mass media content cannot influence anyone who has no use for it, but, can only influence those viewers who have some use for the media in the environment he/ she
The theory explains “how individuals use mass communication to gratify their needs” (Burgeon, Hunsaker and Dawson, 1994, cited in Udende and Azeez, 2010, p. 34). The theory holds that “people influence the effects that mass media have on them” (Anaeto et al, 2008 cited in Edegoh, Asemah and Nwammuo, 2013, p. 23). The assumption of the theory is that people are not just passive receivers of media messages; rather, they actively influence the message effects. Media audience selectively choose, attend to, perceive and retain media offerings on the basis of their needs, beliefs, etc., thus, “there are as many reasons for using the media as there are media users”