Hetch Hetchy: To Dam or Not to Dam? As a result of the industrial movements in America, there was a new kind of movement: the environmentalist movement. Some citizens were concerned that the rapid growth of America’s market and urban areas would negatively affect the natural aspects of America. The debate in the early 1900s over the Hetch Hetchy dam showcased the uprising of citizens deemed as protectionists, such as John Muir, and how they differed from conservationists, such as Gifford Pinchot. The arguments and results of this issue are still relevant today, as there is currently a debate concerning whether or not to restore Hetch Hetchy to its former glory. Gifford Pinchot supported the building of the dam because he was a conservationist. This means he believed the dam could be a beneficial natural resource because it would provide water to San Francisco. He opposed protectionist views, like Muir’s, in the reading “Giving a Dam!” and refuted preservationist’s policies. He argued that the natural beauty would be conserved for the most part, but it would be used for advantageous …show more content…
Environmentalists have dreamed of restoring Hetch Hetchy to its original state for years and scientists concluded that it was possible. Measure F is a government policy that would empty the reservoir and replace the electricity and water it provides to citizens in the Bay Area, and San Francisco voters could be voting on it within the next year. This would require funds consisting of millions of dollars, which excludes the potential issues that could arise in the process, especially concerning the landscape. On the other hand, species of animals and plants could return to the valley in just as quickly as five years. Sarah Null, an assistant professor of watershed at Utah State University, states, “Most people could go there in 40 or 50 years and not even realize that there was ever a dam
John Muir, a naturalist and preservation pioneer of nature took an ethical stand for land ethics when he shared his thoughts that all living things are equally important parts of the land, and animals and plants have as much right to live and survive as people do. In the 1600’s when Europeans began to settle in North America, there were 1037 million acres of forestland. Today, a little over 700 million acres in the United States is forestland—only thanks to preservation laws. In the 1800’s, that number of tress and forests decreased tremendously because expansion and progression recklessly exploited natural resources by clear-cutting forest to use wood for fuel and building supplies.
It was a right thing to bring back the river, not only to bring back the Salmon , but also to help the environment. Daniel Weintraub writes, “... the warring parties.. are working together on a project that should benefit the environment.. fishing industry and local economy”(3).This affirmation is describing that not only are the warring groups coming together, but they are helping the environment by bringing back the river. To bring back the San Joaquin
In “Wrong assumptions,” Art Cullen, an editor of The Storm Lake Times, disputed Gov. Terry Branstad’s strategy to resolve the problems of polluted landscapes and contaminated water in Des Moines, Iowa. As a citizen of Iowa, Cullen is concern about the effects the controversy might influence not only his daily life but also the residents and community. Despite Cullen commending Branstad’s efforts to solving this conflict, Cullen points out that there were flaws in Branstad’s plan by stating in the article that “We have a few problems with the assumptions (Cullen, para 2).” In addition, Cullen suggested that the foremost solution would be using the Clean Water Act as the main point to how they will resolve their complications in the most fashionable
Yuma’s Irrigation Intro: Yuma's irrigation in the past was horrible but has gotten better throughout the years. In the past there was always flood incidents due to the river being uncontrolled and overflowing. With negatives comes positives, in this case the hoover dam helped us control the colorado river which was and still is one our main resources. People would save large amounts of money because it was not needed to be used on distillation payments.
The construction of the Kinzua Dam in the 1960 has been symbolic to the Seneca Nation people. Ohi:yo dwagahdegyo:’ -I am from the ancestral land that covered 10,000 acres that ran along the ohi:yo; Alleghany River. In 1794 Seneca nation signed a peace treaty with the United States that guaranteed land for the Seneca people. Article three in the 1794 treaty declared that “the United States acknowledge all the land within the aforementioned boundaries, to be the property of the Seneka [sic] nation; and the United States will never claim the same, nor disturb the Seneka nation.” The inception of Kinzua Dam initiated in 1950 while the Seneca nation people were unaware.
As a result, if the lake is drained it could be restored to its former structure and become a tourist place such as the Grand Canyon. Secondly, he poses some doubts on the idea that the water dam couldn't be drained
But in the views of the majority, The beauty of the Hetch Hetchy will be preserved despite the construction of the Hetch Hetchy dam. In his testimony before the House Committee on the Public Lands, Pinchot states, "You might say from the standpoint of enjoyment of beauty and the greatest good to the greatest number, they will be conserved by the passage of the bill, and there will be a great deal more use of the beauty of the park then there is now” (Pinchot 2). Simply said, the construction of the many roads and trails will lead to even more accessible beauty of the Yosemite. In addition, John Freeman’s still image, “Photo of the Proposed Hetch Hetchy Reservoir,” displays both a clear, crystalline body of water, and beautiful green trees on the faces of the mountains that cave out. The Hetch Hetchy dam would still be as naturally beautiful as it was before when it was preserved, and along with that, the construction of the dam will benefit the greatest number of
In response to this discussion, Senators Kyl and McCain wrote the article, “An Endless Tribal Water Fight,” in hopes of defending the intentions of their bill. On the other hand, Navajo representative, Ed Bencenti wrote the article, “Senate Bill 2109 Seeks to Extinguish Navajo and Hopi Water Rights,” in which he exposes the real intentions of the Senate Bill. Both Kyl and McCain do a good job of presenting their claims to support their interests. However, the intentions of the Senate Bill are not ethical and efficient; instead of attempting to alleviate the issue of the scarcity of water, it is contributing to this problem by taking away the water that belonged to the tribes’ and giving it to coal
Environment Change: A Rhetorical Analysis on Rush Limbaugh’s “The Environmental Mindset”. In Rush Limbaugh’s “The environmental mindset”, Limbaugh introduces us to a very conservative view on environment change and how we have little to no effect on our climate(Limbaugh). In Rush’s article, he writes in a way to persuade people such as right wing conservatives, upper-middle class caucasian males, and politicians that can reinforce his notions. He solely relies on logos throughout the article, using no other credible sources other than himself with ethos and scarcely appealing to emotions in pathos.
The reclamation of the San Joaquin River has improved the surrounding ecosystem drastically. With the river return came improvement in the aspects that were questioned before the restoration. Restoring the San Joaquin has revitalized the community, resurrected the salmon population, and catalyzed a change in California water management. The doubts of the people were settled by proving that the river renewal not only brought back salmon population, but rehabilitated the neighboring areas. Reconstruction of the San Joaquin river has been estimated to generate 11,000 new local jobs in the San Joaquin Valley this will help expand and strengthen the region’s economy.
As Kitson (2009) notes, "the hydropower projects, in many ways, represented a new form of colonization, as indigenous peoples were excluded from the decision-making process and bore the brunt of the social and environmental impacts of the dams" (p. 630). This lack of consultation and collaboration with Native American communities during the planning and approval of hydropower projects has been a significant challenge in mitigating their impacts. In fact, as Deloria and Lytle (2011) explain, "the United States government, which had a trust responsibility to protect tribal lands and resources, had approved the dam without consulting the tribal nations that would be most affected by it" (p.
Glen Canyon Dam was built to provide much needed power to Phoenix. President Eisenhower greenlit the project and the Bureau of Reclamation was the force behind its construction. Although the Sierra Club fought against building the dam, their efforts were not successful. Its creation decimated the natural ecosystems, fish that had evolved to survive in its silty water died as clear colder water came out of the dam. Archeologically the dam also represented a loss, as thousand-year-old petroglyph panes and caved dwelling of the Anasazi became submerged.
The San Joaquin river does not need to be restored according to many experts. The director of the Lyles Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship Tim Stearns does not agree with the river rights projects. Stearns claims “people across the country take cheap food for granted”, we do not need the salmon from the river as a steady food supply. The farmers are taking advantage of the water and are being greedy with it. Experts at UC Davis that are studying the decline salmon population claim “the fish are exceptionally vulnerable to climate change”.
Thanks to him many believe in Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored
In order for here to deliver her message to the best of her ability, her dominant organizational pattern problem- solution because she gives the problem, which is that nature's definition is too strict. The secondary organizational pattern advantages- disadvantages because she states the old claim presented by Bill McKibben, which was that nature is no longer because it has been altered by humans. She also uses many rhetorical devices. The speaker uses irony, express something which is contrary to the intended meaning, when she describes how it takes a lot of maintenance to make national parks look untouched. Use of rhetorical question when asking the audience what counts as nature, so the audience can really think about her concept.