Chris,
1. Your introduction mentioning each firm’s knowledge base reminded me of Helfat &Peteraf’s (2003) reference to teams having human capital, social capital, and cognition. We are often reminded that it all comes down to people. In fact, so much can be summed up by that, its all about the people. Their knowledge, skills, experience, social network, behavior and characteristics play a significant role in the success of their teams and ultimately the organization.
Helfat & Peteraf (2003) go on to describe how the power and compatibilities of a team bring a level of heterogeneity in early on. The characteristics, or quality, of each team member, the team as a whole, and leadership provides heterogeneity in capabilities. Since no two people are exactly alike, this heterogeneity has the advantage that it cannot be duplicated. This makes the effective combination of resources and capabilities important if the firm wants to hold a competitive advantage for long.
…show more content…
The combination of resources and capabilities are significant because if one firm has the knowledge of an opportunity and implements a strategy, others witness and implement the same strategy. Without a solid understanding of how important combining the resources and capabilities of a firm, the group of competitors soon have the same idea, resources, and purpose which takes away the competitive advantage one had previously.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, (1). 99-120.
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The Dynamic Resource-Based View: Capability Lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, (10).
Organizations are most productive when individuals work as a whole to gather knowledge and when leaders rule effectively in order to gain respect. A leader rules most effectively when they use cruelty to instill fear in their followers (Source D). For example, a coach on a football team will have better results during practice and games if he coaches so that his players fear rather than love him. A way to do this is if the coach uses harsh punishments, like conditioning, when his players step out of line.
Unfortunately to build the value chain we would need a more thorough investigation on the TJ’s processes and arrangements. In my opinion to make the proper investigation of the resources gaps and missed capabilities it is required to be very familiar with the company’s organizational aspects and business process. But due to the fact the company does not publish any investor reports and is has never gone public (Stock Exchange or Private equity funding). In my opinion the Porter’s tool such as Value chain analysis in this case has disadvantages comparing to Grant’s simple approach to resource management and strategic planning.
Resources and Capabilities VRIO Framework V R I O Competitive Implication Strong corporate culture + + + + Sustainable competitive advantage Strong investment in R&D + + + + Temporary competitive advantage Outstanding customer service + + + + Sustainable competitive advantage
Debra, In my practice, I also see more white nurses in a managerial position than the minority groups. Another consideration is the diversity in the age of nurses. The average age of nurses in the workforce is increasing, which means that over the next ten to fifteen years one-third of the nurses will be over 50 years old (Andrews & Boyle, 2016). At some point, our country will be suffering from a nursing shortage due to this group of nurses retiring.
Apply the concept of VRIN to analyse its value-creating ability. All resources that an organization has may not have strategic relevance. Only certain resources are capable of being an input to a value creating strategy which put the organization in a position of competitive advantage. Great brand identity gives Disney's parks an edge over its competitors. Applying the concept of VRIN (valuable, rare, inimitable, non-substitutable) on Disneyland theme parks- • Valuable-
- Ways in which diversity can impact on work and work relationships - The similarities and differences that exist between you and your work community may have an impact on your work. Everyone around you will have similarities and differences, there is a reason we are all individual people, we are all different and have something different to offer. Culture plays an important part in shaping a person’s behaviour. Cultural values and beliefs provide a framework for people to make assumptions about and respond to their situations and or circumstances. Culture also strongly influences perceptions and expectations.
Question 2: To do a resource-based analysis of any organization, it needs to go through different steps, first identify the three categories of the resources , the tangible ,intangible, and the human resources , second identify the capacity of the organization to put its resources for a desired end and in good use, third to decide on suitable strategy for the organization we need to do SWOT analysis to determine the organization strength and weakness compared to the competitors, third what are the key successful factors of the organization that can be determine by identifying the customers of the organization and their needs, and what the organization will do to survive the competition ( Hall&Keynes,2015) also audit analysis to Ford resources , and value chain analysis to Ford activities . In the next section, there will a brief explanation about the steps mentioned above , followed by an application to each step to, Ford motor which was incorporated in Delawae in 1919, it is a global automotive industry leader in Dearborn and Michigan, distributed vehicles across six continents the core business of Ford , designing and manufacturing cars, marketing , financing and servicing a full line of Fords cars, trucks, SUVs, and electrified cars, and Lincoln luxury car (Ford annual report,2015). Resource-based view (RBV) is an essential theory for strategic managers , considering the organization resources the assets , capabilities organization
To do this it needs to have a competitive advantage over its its rivals. A competitive advantage is something a company does better than its rivals that gives it an advantage over its rival. Porter (1988) states that a firm performs many activities that can contribute to a firms relative cost position and create a basis for differentiation which can create a cost advantage that gives a firm a competitive advantage over its competitors. A company’s competitive advantage and competitive strategy are both interrelated. Competitive strategy is defined by Porter (1980) as a broad formula for how a business is going to compete, what its goals should be, and what policies will be needed to carry out those goals.
In today’s era managers are challenged daily with disputes like ethics, diversity, working in teams, privacy, sexual harassment, and handling differences. Furthermore, these issues are discussed because they are constantly the debatable topics in the workplace. More importantly, handling differences and diversity is the current situations in the workplace. Moreover, a few managerial concepts must be considered, including selection methods, training and development, performance appraisal, and diversity management.
Competitive advantage is when two or more firms compete within the same markets, one firm possess a competitive advantage over its rival when it earns (or has potential to earn) a persistently higher rate of profit. There are three types of competitive advantage. a) Cost leadership strategy occurs when a firm a delivers the same services as its rivals but at a lower price. b) The differentiation strategy occurs when a firm delivers greater services for the same price of its rivals. c) Focus strategy is a focused approach requires the firm to concentrate along one specific segment either a cost leadership or a specialization strategy.
The competitive advantage received by a firm will likely
Today’s most business primary concern is retaining workforce diversity. Recognizing the importance of diversity in the organization and effectively manage to ensure the organization and its valuable diverse employees are growing hand in hand. Rising of immigrants’ employment opportunity, joint venturing business globally has equally brought an opportunity for shared values, exchange of cultures and intelligence to widen the opportunity for business enterprise and also a platform for employees to reach target goal.
Resource based view is the tool that is used in order to evaluate the resources that are important for the organisation to make their performance effective. It is regarded as a significant approach that is used by the organisation towards attainment of competitive advantage. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the resource based view literature and then applying the knowledge on the evaluation of a case study organisation. The selected organisation is Zara Fast Fashion, which is analysed with the help of use of RBV towards achievement of sustainable competitive advantage. The theoretical concepts of the resource-based view is analysed and applied on Zara as a real world example.
Mazur (2010) goes on to say that diversity in workforce is the face of changing world and the new policies of management needs to work around and within with this derive a better performing and competing workforce. In a world rapidly globalizing cultural difference will become the new dividing lines and they become more obvious (Huntington, 1996). The evidence in history is prominent as to, how Ptolemaic culture flourished because of the trade relations with the Mediterranean and the Indian subcontinent, Alexandria became one of the main cultural and economical centers (Helble, 2006). Organization globally has struggled to find ways to excel their target or forecasted business and have been evolving adoption of strategy to achieve that goal. Over years it has struggled to find ways to use the diversified backgrounds of workforce to get a commercial advantage (Love, 2010).
Organizations thus benefit from applying this theory. We furthermore suggest that when deploying talents, organizations should also consider managing the weaknesses of their talents. Focusing on the strengths of talents does not mean that their shortcomings can be neglected completely (Buckingham 2005; Linley and Harrington, 2006). One way to alleviate the problems caused by individual weaknesses is to partner different talents to build complementary strength profiles in a team, which allows one partner to take over those tasks that are difficult for the other partner as a result of this latter’s