Until early 20th century, ‘heterosexuality’ was used to refer to ‘morbid sexual practices’ between men and women such as oral and anal intercourse, as opposed to ‘normal’ procreative sex. The term homosexuality – that is so casually usedtodayand is almost an everyday vocabulary – came into being only in the late 19th century Europe when discussions on the varied expressions of sex and sexuality became acceptable in academic circles. The term was used to describe “morbid sexual passion between members of the same sex.” It was declared ‘unnatural’ by colonial laws, as unnatural as casual sex between men and women that was not aimed at conception.
The term homosexuality and the laws prohibiting ‘unnatural’ sex were imposed across the world through
…show more content…
There have been many explanations offered for these images – ranging from the apologetic to the ridiculous. Some scholars hold a rather puritanical view that devotees are being exhorted to leave these sexual thoughts aside before entering the sanctum sanctorum. Others believe that hidden in these images is a sacred Tantric geometry; the aspirant can either be deluded by the sexuality of the images or enlightened by deciphering the geometrical patterns therein. One school of thought considers these images to representations of either occult rites or fertility ceremonies. Another suggests that these were products of degenerate minds obsessed with sex in a corrupt phase of Indian history. According to ancient treatises on architecture, a religious structure is incomplete unless its walls depicts something erotic, for sensual pleasures (kama) are as much an expression of life as are righteous conduct (dharma), economic endeavours (artha) and spiritual pursuits (moksha).
Interpretations and judgements aside, these images to tell us that the ‘idea’ of same-sex and what the colonial rulers termed ‘unnatural’ intercourse did exist in India. One can only speculate if the images represent the common or the
However, also stated that there is no historical standing in that origin of law that was targeting homosexual conduct in a direct view. Sodomy laws passed in earlier times, were not passed to prohibit same sex acts but was aimed to ban sexual acts that were not intended to procreate in general, whether it was between men and woman, or man and man. Also, those laws were not enforced between consenting adults in private. Prosecutions against sodomy were of predatory acts against anyone who were forced and non consenting; such as children and men, and or between man and
Corvino’s essay “Homosexuality and the PIB Argument” elaborates on the disagreements between certain parties, such as natural law lawyers and other philosophers, pertaining to homosexuality and the notion that allowing same sex marriage will permit others to practice polygamy, incest, and bestiality (PIB). Corvino insists that when looking upon this argument, one will need to recognize and comprehend all sides of the dispute and thus be able to scrutinize such arguments proficiently. Through the process of analyzing all sides of this notorious disagreement, Corvino hopes to clarify and refute homosexuality and the PIB argument as well as give his own analysis and position on the subject (3). Corvino begins his debate by explaining the PIB
INTRODUCTION Legal punishments for sodomy often included heavy fines and/or life prison sentences, with some states, beginning with Illinois in 1827, denying other rights, such as suffrage, to anyone convicted of the crime of sodomy. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, several states imposed various eugenics laws against anyone deemed to be a "sexual pervert". As late as 1970, Connecticut denied a driver's license to a man for being an "admitted homosexual".
There has been an evaluation of sexual behavior over the past centuries, and it has demonstrated that there were acts that were considered taboo, homosexuality, bestiality and so on. Due to the emergence of most of the cultures, the history of sexual behavior shows an increase in the collective supervision of sexual abuse, moral codes were developed in the process. The sexual activity of some cultures have been “detailed in art, literature, poetry, mythology, and theater”(pg. 24). Even same-sex behavior was actually displayed in visual arts.
Alfred Charles Kinsey altered the way in which people of the twentieth century understood homosexuality. This created a great deal of discussion and controversy that became an enduring part of American culture, which introduced the world into viewing homosexuality as customary. Historian Dagmar Herzog supports Alfred Charles Kinsey’s findings by observing Europeans reactions to Kinsey’s report in comparison to Americans reactions. Historian Dagmar Herzog argues what Kinsey accomplished was phenomenal, he took ordinary people and the rage and intensity of their sexual longings and the diversity of their actual sexual practices seriously as no one had done before (Herzog, 2006). Therefore, Kinsey influenced the way the world viewed homosexuality
The 1920s were changing times and with people becoming more open about who they were, the idea of homosexuality began to become more widespread. However, that did not mean that homosexuality was in any way accepted by society. Doctors and psychologists believed that there was something wrong with people who identified as homosexual and there was a way to “fix” them. The doctors underwent studies attempting to classify and categorize these people based on their human behavior. Havelock Ellis was a physician and psychologist who discussed a phenomenon known as “sexual inversion.”
As Lady Bertilak ponders the idea of Sir Gawain rejecting her because of another lover, he responds: “Be Saynt John,' / And smethely con he smyle, / ' In fayth I welde right non / Ne non wil welde the while” (1788-91). He says that he has no lover and does not want one.
Sexuality is known be a fluid idea to which sexuality is defined differently for everyone. The idea of having sex for sexual pleasure is commonplace within modern literature, but it was not always like that. Sex was mostly referred to as sexual intercoarse between a married couple in the hopes that one would produce a child, until later years when the idea of sexual attraction was created. The 1909 Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary defines homosexuality as a medical term meaning “morbid sexual passion for one of the same sex.” This definition of homosexuality implicates how the idea of homosexuality was viewed as abnormal disease based on the implications how same sex couples cannot procreate.
Ceara Cavalieri HIST107H Waddington Puritan Sexuality in the 17th Century The typical stereotype of a Puritan is widely described as religious extremists whom held strong beliefs against sexual pleasure in its entirety, causing them to be sexually oppressed. Although there have been instances of deviancy being punished for sexual acts, for the most part these acts received lighter sentencing than their laws were said to uphold. This is due to the Puritan ideology that man is flawed and deserves forgiveness. Puritan sexuality was extremely complex—more than many realize.
In the book, Understanding Homosexuality, public speaker and author Alan Shlemon equips the reader to be both thoughtful and considerate as a Christian ambassador to the lost and confused of the world, specifically regarding the sin of homosexuality. Throughout the book, he argues for why Christians cannot endorse homosexuality and why instead they must be ready to defend their beliefs. Shlemon provides solid and reliable information for the everyday Christian to approach the issue of homosexuality not only with facts and truth but also with wisdom and compassion. Alan Shlemon has multiple reasons for his position based not only upon scriptures but also science. One of the core ideas for his refusal to except homosexuality as natural and moral
Joey Cho Mrs. Middleton English 10 17 October 2016 Persuasive Research Essay Outline Introduction LGBT/ same-sex marriage is one of the most heated and controversial debates in our current society. Unlike the past thousands of years whereas marriage was defined as a legal union between a man and a woman, now the concept of marriage has been extended to a broader context. “Homosexuality” in most cultures is viewed as a disgrace, and it is often considered as a great sin from a religious aspect.
Gay marriage is an import issue to debate. Although the congress approved a resolution about that topic, some people still think it cannot be accepted. Especially in many Asian countries and some countries in Europe, in their opinion, homosexuality is an illness, and Gay Marriage is absolutely illegal. However, in 1990, WHO (World Health Organization) eliminated the homosexuality illness out of the disease list. According to them, they said that it was the natural sexual desire, but some people cannot accept that.
“Up to the end of the eighteenth century, three major explicit codes governed sexual practices, canonical law, the Christian pastoral, and civil law” (37). These laws determined what was licit and illicit and established the foundational base for the perverse. The sexuality of children, criminals, those who liked the same sex, sodomists, people who had peculiar desires, etc., came under scrutiny, especially those who committed homosexual acts. Before the nineteenth century, a person could commit a sexual act without having a label, but with the discourse of sex came a persecution of sexualities and, “the nineteenth-century homosexual became a personage, a type of life, a life form…nothing that went into his total composition was unaffected by his sexuality” (43). Homosexuality was their identity, a reality they must live in everyday.
Homosexuality was once considered sacred in ancient Rome, albeit being treated poorly since the middle ages. Like this, homosexuality has been suppressed for a long time and thenceforth, the public opinion towards it has been on a downward road until recent years when LGBT groups started stepping up front and coming out along with the increasing controversy towards their rights. The subject of homosexuality has always been polemical. Every once in a while a news article would come up saying something like "Manny Pacquiao provokes storm by calling gay people ‘worse than animals’" or "Sam Smith Talks Coming Out As Gay".
As we all know, India is famous for its various religions and temples, as well as the eroticism in their art history. It is Devangana Desai1 Hindu temples all over India are replete with sexual motifs, not only renowned temples like those of Khajuraho, Konarak and Bhubaneswar but also temples lesser known sites have portrayals of erotic figures. So here comes the question, the temples are usually considered as the sacred places where the deities should stay, but why are these erotic sculptures set in these temples? In the highest thought and wisdom of India culture, sex was considered as a distraction of self-realization, but why it was depicted on the religious architecture? Actually the sex in the religious art of India culture