High school exit exams are the trapdoors of the world of education. These tests tie our scores to our diplomas and push students that missed the cutoff out of school and into unemployment. Exit Exams are an unfair way of determining whether or not a student should receive their diploma. Most students work very hard throughout their years in school to receive good grades which should be enough to determine whether or not a student should pass high school. State laws that require students to pass an exit exam in order to receive a highschool diploma can harm students and schools. According to an article from Linda Hammond, a reporter at Stanford University, inflexible high school exit exam policies force teachers to “rush” the curriculum they …show more content…
This means that over the course of the year, the students progress is being tracked and evaluated. Therefore, taking a cumulative exam at the end of the year doesn’t tell a teacher anything they don’t already know about a student’s abilities. In my experience when people cram for finals, they become stressed and go over just enough material in order to pass the test, but they end up forgetting everything else that they have learned throughout the year. This completely defeats the purpose of school which is to fully understand and expand your knowledge on specific …show more content…
Many students stay up late studying or lay awake at night worrying about the high-stakes test they have the next day. In a study performed by Nancy Hamilton, a psychology professor at the University of Kansas, looked at the effects these high-stake exams take on students. She found that the anxiety that was being felt wasn’t caused by fear of the test itself. The stress and anxiety came from the thoughts about the potential life changing consequences that could come after the test itself such as worrying about getting into a good college, landing a good high paying job, and the fear of disappointing their parents. Many people continue to believe that without these exams too many students will receive their diplomas without actually earning them. These people believe that if students go through the year getting A’s and B’s then they should be able to pass these tests with no problem. The students that earn the good grades should be able to easily set themselves apart from the others that don’t necessarily try throughout the year and the students who don’t put in any effort should not be given their diploma without working to earn
Opting out of Standardized Tests is not the answer In the present era, we people talk a lot about education structure and standards in a region and its effects on various classes of people in that region. It is so because education is the primary thing to decide many facets of life and society. In regard to that, the article here says that whether or not the students from 3 to 8 grades given a choice to opt out of standardized tests in New-york. According to me, it should not be given for a variety of reasons.
Some opponents may say that some graduated students cannot pass even high school exam and that is why we need to make a harder standard of the education system. However, high school students take tests what they study in last week or month, but the adults cannot pass the test because they finished school a long time ago and may have already forgotten a lot. According to the article “L.A. Unified retreats on higher graduation standards” by Howard Blume, “The Los Angeles Board of Education on Tuesday retreated from new, more rigorous graduation standards out of concern that huge numbers of students would fail to earn diplomas.” I totally agree with the author that is good idea retreated from highest standards so that more students can get diplomas.
Way back when: parents knew when to be responsible for their children’s academic accomplishments – and students themselves – this seems to have diminished completely. the times have completely changed, nowadays, many people AKA ignorant parents, believe that it is the high school itself, teachers, and the government that are responsible for students getting good grade because the arrogance and sense of pride levels have risen so much, they are too prideful to believe their child could possibly fail and it be their fault. Before, when you got an F, your parents would blame you, ground you, and make you write “ill do my homework” 100 times on a piece of paper; today, they would rather take the time out of their day, go to your school and demand
In Gregory Cizeks "Consequences of high stakes testing", he states "Illustrating how testing... produces gripping anxiety in even the brightest students and has been known to make children cry, vomit, or both. " You've felt it before. The nervousness, the 'what if I fail' and 'I can't fail or I'll never have a good future' thoughts. Standerdized testing instills a large amount of fear and anxiety for fear of failing. In a Washington Post article from 2011, they talk about a 7th grade girl who ran away from home to avoid a test.
Many students are smart and understand the content, but it doesn't show on test scores (Gregory J. Cizek, 2001). In essence, testing brings out stress in even the brightest of students, messing with their heads come test day. The facts show that from the 50 states, 700 school districts claim that standardardized tests are causing greater anxiety than the average everyday assessments (Joseph Spector, 2015). In conclusion, student achievement
But this isn’t the teachers fault. They are being pressured as well. Jackie Holt, a social studies teacher at Lawrence County High School, gives insight into the mind of a teacher when it comes to standardized
Dropping testing would “result in higher levels of academic achievement in entering classes at public schools” (Jaschik). A Wake Forest Study showed that “79% of the 2012 incoming class was in the top 10% in high school, before test optional it was in the low 60s%” (Balf). Students who have worked hard in high school should be rewarded for their diligence instead rewarding intelligent students who do not demonstrate the proper effort. When colleges accept students with better grades instead of those with better tests scores, they are more likely to get determined students who will excel in college. At public schools, a 30% increase of minorities and low income applicants was seen when schools become test optional (Jaschik).
Some schools that have become test optional have done so because they believe this will attract a more diverse applicant pool. Many students in high school begin taking practice tests during freshman year, as well as taking actual tests. Standardized tests such as the ACT and SAT limit access to college for minorities, and colleges are beginning to consider two alternative admissions policies that do not involve these tests: class rank admissions systems and admissions lotteries. Although colleges still will have to deny thousands of students yearly, the review of applications would hopefully be based on a more holistic process versus one test having the highest
A student may deem the entire year a failure if he or she failed that one test. Continue that trend for a few years, and school itself seems useless. If school is useless, why waste time there? According to the results Audrey Amrein and David Berliner recorded, “sixty-three percent of the states with high school graduation tests posted decreases in the average age of students who took the GED exam after the high-stakes tests were implemented” (“The Effects on High-Stakes Testing…”). With the amount of accountability and strict course direction, the decreasing age at which drop outs are happening is not surprising.
Students in the United States go to high school, graduate with a good GPA, apply to a college of their choice, get accepted, and go through college to find a high-paying job in the future. Unfortunately, there are some students who have the grades but do not have the test scores that colleges would like to see to be admitted. The alternate route for these students that still would want to pursue a college degree would be to either retake the tests that they did not do the best on or apply to a community college, and then transfer into a college of their choice. The use of standardized testing in college admissions should be eliminated due to its biased nature, limited scope, and lack of effectiveness in predicting student success. Standardized
This will create a disfavor to both the teacher who strived to help their students develop and the student who overstrains over the course of the year and enhanced extremely, but failed to score proficient. Many students also create test worrisome which hinders performance. From the objectors view, the standardized tests are used as a unique screening function; for example, in Japan, there is no general certificate of secondary education like Baccalaureate or GCE as in European nations. Most of the students at the mandatory education level are promoted almost automatically from grade to grade and the screening function is in this manner restrained inside schools, students are just sorted by their accomplishments by taking a selective particular entrance examination that is mainly composed of a written achievement test during the transition from one educational level to the next, as well as the Sat tests, in United States and other countries, are used for college admissions. To sum up, the focus on learning strengthens the student methodology aspects to act logically all alone benefit through the procurement of valuable information, valuable aptitudes and proper mentalities which creates for them, as well as other people, safety places, security and healthy interaction (Bernard, 1999).
Receiving a pass because the students are in high school is a way of saying they are weak-minded. The students do not want to be labeled as weak minded. Therefore, the students need to step their game up and show others they know how to overcome
This method will prevent students from gaining the knowledge they seek and will not work to their advantage later on in the future. Most high school classes are teaching students how to take tests rather than teaching them how to skilfully answer them and master them. This causes students to enter college and university unprepared as they develop little skill-making abilities. High-stake standardized testing, such as the SAT, is burdensome for students. The standardized test scores that a student receives determine which university a student can attend and this greatly impacts his or her future.
From a young age, the children in Singapore are exposed to an education system of standardized assessments and examinations which rewards and recognizes stellar results and scorns the poor. As a result, the students fear failure and are pressured to keep up with the standards, just to gain validation and approval. As cited from the Ministry of Social and Family Development, “a greater proportion of children fear failing tests and examinations more than the death of their parents”, with 36% fearing failure and 17% fearing the death of parents (n.d.). With this statistic, the fact that more students are afraid of failing their examinations than the lost of a loved one, is a testament to the immense stress carried on their shoulders.
Many of these current and former students claim that the coursework is challenging or interesting enough. Due to the No Child Left Behind Policy, this enables underperforming students to pass through each grade until the 12th grade. This policy makes passing students through High School much easier. The issue with this is that oftentimes students are given a High School Diploma instead of earning one which will make their transition to adulthood more difficult as they are not prepared yet. This is especially an issue when High School faculty put much pressure on their students to enroll in college right after graduation without providing clear guidance if each student is suitable for college.