ipl-logo

Highest Court In Malaysia Essay

1720 Words7 Pages

Is the highest court in Malaysia. Consists of the chief justice federal court, the President of the Court of Appeal, the Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak and six Federal Court Judges. Every proceeding is heard by minimum of three judges or greater. The chief justice is head of the Malaysian judiciary. His appointment are made by The Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the advice of the Prime Minister after consulting the Conference of Rulers Federal Court of Malaysia.
Article 121(2) of the Federal Constitution confers the Federal Court with the following jurisdiction which is to determine appeals from decisions of the Court of Appeal, of the High Court or a judge. Consultative jurisdiction as is specified in Articles 128 and 130 and Such other jurisdiction as may be conferred by or under federal law . Article 128(1) of the Federal Constitution states that the Federal Court has the exclusive jurisdiction to determine in Any question whether a law made by Parliament or by the Legislature of a State is invalid on the ground that it makes provision with respect to a matter with respect to which Parliament or the Legislature of the State has no power to make laws and disputes on any other question between States or between the Federation and any State. Law, the State and Constitution. Malaysia, which consists of Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak is one …show more content…

However; sec 3 is bound on two limitations. It is applied only in the absence of local statutes on particular subjects , only part of the English law that is suited to local circumstances will be applied. Doctrine of judicial precedent which meaning that every time the judge is to make a decision in a trial, they are follow the previous decision made by the previous judge, where the fact in the previous case is the same as in the present case. If there is no precedent, the judge is bound to make decision as he think just

Show More
Related

  • Court Case Of Adnan Masud Syed

    677 Words  | 3 Pages

    Adnan Masud Syed, 19, was convicted of murder that sentenced him in prison for life on June 20, 2000. Mr. Syed was accused of strangling his ex girlfriend, Hae Min Lee, 18, and burying her body in Leakin Park on January 13th, 1999. The body was eventually uncovered and Adnan became the primary suspect after an anonymous call was made to the police a few weeks after the crime to investigate Adnan. The prosecutors had stated that Adnan’s motive of murdering Hae was because he was hurt and outraged when they broke up. To counter, the defense attorney had claimed that Adnan was an average American teen, incapable of murder, and he was an honors student at Woodlawn High School.

    Read More

  • The Supreme Court Case Of Plessy Vs. Ferguson

    2223 Words  | 9 Pages

    The Supreme Court is a federal court, the highest body in the judicial branch of the United States government. The Supreme Court contains a chief justice and eight associate justices. All of these are appointed by the president and confirmed by the senate. The Supreme Court contains the plaintiff, defendant, chief lawyer for plaintiffs, chief defense lawyer, justices of the court, and the justices dissenting. The plaintiff is a person who brings a case against another in a court of law.

    Read More

  • Balance Of Power In New Spain Essay

    609 Words  | 3 Pages

    The legal system does not follow a precedent instead it deals with each case on the individual level. It

    Read More

  • Judicial Crisis Dbq

    797 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the year 1803, an ambivalent, undetermined principle lingered within the governing minds. The government and its “justified” Constitution were thought to be fully explained, until a notion occurred that would bring individuals to question the authority and their limit for empowerment. To end his days as president, John Adams named fifty-eight people from his political party to be federal judges, filing positions created by the Judiciary Act of 1800, under the frequently listed Organic Act. His secretary John Marshall delivered and sealed most of the commissions, however seventeen of them had not yet been delivered before Adams’s departure in 1801. On top of that, Thomas Jefferson refused to appoint those seventeen people because they were

    Read More

  • Australian Legal System Essay

    1935 Words  | 8 Pages

    Legal Studies How well does the Australian Legal System deal with the contemporary issue (drug use and the law) The Australian legal system was developed from the legal system of Britain originally, between 1855 and 1890 the British parliament granted a limited right to set up a local system of governments to each of the British colonies within Australia. This allowed each of the colonies the right to develop their own laws and legal systems to deal with its particular situation. There was a move towards creating a central legal system during the late 19th century, a referendum was held in each colony to approve the draft constitution. The Australian Constitution Act was passed as an Act of the British Government and took effect on January

    Read More

  • Supreme Courts Dbq

    1112 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Supreme Court priorities from the time period of 1790 to 1865 were establishing the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was instrumental in founding the Federal Court System. The framers believed that establishing a National Judiciary was an urgent and important task. After the installation of Chief Justice John Marshall who “used his dominance to strengthen the court 's position and advance the policies he favored” (Baum 20). However, in the decision of the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803 was an example of the power he exuded “in which the Court struck down a Federal statute for the first time” (Baum 20). This created some internal conflict between Marshall and President Thomas Jefferson, however Marshall was able to diffuse this with

    Read More

  • What Are The Three Branches Of Texas Government

    721 Words  | 3 Pages

    The federal jurisdiction is consist  of two supreme courts, the supreme court of Texas and the courts of criminal appeal. In the court of criminal appeals it mainly deals with criminal cases where as the supreme court  controls only civil cases and cases that involves juveniles. At the local and state levels there are 14 court of appeals, several of them are district courts, elected members, justices and judges. Justice represents the supreme court, the court of criminal appeal, and the court of appeals which fulfil six year terms. The judges represent the lower court and fulfil four year

    Read More

  • Dual Court System

    635 Words  | 3 Pages

    The court structure in the United States is comprised of a dual court system. The dual court system consists of “one system of state and local courts and another system of federal courts” (Bohm & Haley, 2011, p. 274). Although the system has a separate court system for state and federal court, they do connect in the United States Supreme Court. Each court has various levels of jurisdiction to hear and make decisions over cases (Bohm & Haley, 2011).

    Read More

  • The Judicial Branch

    1514 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Judicial Branch incorporates the Supreme Court, the most noteworthy court in the United States, as well as other government courts. The judges of the Supreme Court are selected by the president and must be endorsed by Senate. Federal cases, such as Marbury vs. Madison, made the Supreme Court "a separate branch of government on par with Congress and the" executive branch (McBride, 2007, P.1). The motivation behind this case was to affirm the power of the Supreme Court to survey law, to figure out if or not that law is sacred, and to set up the check and offsets. We see these techniques existing today in our nation, in light of the fact that every branch can check the other to keep one branch from turning out to be too intense from the others, as legal over official can pronounce official activities illegal, official over legal can select Supreme Court judges, Legislative over Judicial can change the size of government court framework and the quantity of Supreme Court judges, and so on.

    Read More

  • Birthright Citizenship

    1351 Words  | 6 Pages

    3.4.17 What does the constitution say about birthright citizenship: Professor Edward edlard cal state – he testified before subcommittee 20 years ago, the framers of the constitution, the civil war amendments 13,14,15. Section 5 of the 4th amendment congress can to define the jurisdiction of the united states. Congress has exercised this same authority to define the jurisdiction of the US before in 1986 and later with the immigration reform act and with the illegal immigration reform of 1996. Senator Jacob Howard wrote the 14th amendment citizenship clause he defined who would fall under the citizenship clause jurisdiction when he wrote: “Every person born within the limits of the united states and subject to their jurisdiction is by virtual

    Read More

  • Three Levels Of The Federal Courts Essay

    492 Words  | 2 Pages

    The three levels within the federal courts are: the U.S. Magistrate Courts, the U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. Supreme Court. The magistrate courts are the lowest level and as such are limited to trying misdemeanors, setting bail amounts and assisting the district courts. The U.S. District Courts are the federal branch of original jurisdiction courts. These are responsible for criminal trials and giving guilty or not guilty verdicts. The U.S. Courts of Appeals are responsible for all the appeals from U.S. district courts.

    Read More

  • M1 Unit 1 Legal System

    893 Words  | 4 Pages

    Nicholas Zirpoli Law and Society Professor Weiss September 25, 2015 Unit 1 Legal Systems Unit 1 explores the legal systems of the world starting with the United States. We learned things from how the government was created, to the Bill of Rights. Its all about the laws and how it affects our society as a whole. We also take a look into different governments like France, China, and Saudi Arabia and compare them with our own government.

    Read More

  • Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Common Law System

    1268 Words  | 6 Pages

    [5] Common law works in a different way, the judges rather than the Parliament make common law or ‘judge-made law’. Considering criminal and civil cases, the judges take decisions based on the stare decisis principle (Latin “to stand by things decided”, the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent [4]), deliver rulings and create precedents, thus applying the law to real life situations. Therefore, the value of the precedent is very high in the English Common Law system. The strengths of common law

    Read More

  • Role Of Judiciary In Malaysia

    1103 Words  | 5 Pages

    The hierarchy of courts of Malaysia begins with the Magistrates’ Court, followed by the Sessions Court, High Court, Court of Appeal and finally is the Federal Court of Malaysia. There are generally two types of trials, criminal and civil. The jurisdiction of the courts in civil or criminal matters are contained in the Subordinate Courts Act 1948 and the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. Article 121 of the Constitution provides for two High Courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction, the High Court in Malaya, and the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak. Thus this creates two separate local jurisdiction of the courts – for Peninsular Malaysia and for East Malaysia.

    Read More

  • Importance Of Stare Decisis In Malaysia

    814 Words  | 4 Pages

    Just as in other countries, the law in Malaysia can be found not only in legislation, but also in cases decided by the courts. The courts in question are the Federal Court, the Court of Appeal, and the two High Courts. This is because only decisions of superior courts are sources of law as they are the courts that decide on matters of law whereas lower courts generally discuss on matters of fact. Decisions of the higher courts are binding to the lower courts which is known as stare decisis. Stare decisis is a latin term which means to stand by what has been decided.

    Read More

More about Highest Court In Malaysia Essay

Open Document