The third, and final, device Florence Kelley uses to build her argument is a shift in topic. Her speech is delivered to the National American Woman Suffrage Association, a group primarily concerned with the equality of voting laws. She vows to use her right to petition “in every possible way until the right to ballot is granted.” By referring to a common goal shared by the author and her audience, a sense of trust is established between the two parties.
Both played a big part in getting the nineteenth amendment passed however Susan B. Anthony had passed away before the amendment was passed. The arguments between the two essays were nearly the same but with just a few differences. Stanton’s argument was more about how women deserved to be equal to men in every way. She also thought that the government should not just be run by men, that there should be some women helping to make the laws.
She brought to the table a new idea that was supposed to rock the American people and shatter the glass ceiling. That brand new idea was partially her leading as the first women president, but also the encompassing idea that we need to break down social barriers in America. Her rhetoric focused around this idea throughout her entire campaign. A perfect example of this would be in Mrs. Clinton’s concession speech. In her speech Mrs. Clinton remarks, “It was about the country we love and building an America that is hopeful, inclusive, and big-hearted.
He wanted American women to see the power in Rosie’s bicep but also the neatness and how conservative she was in her work uniform. He wanted to advertise that the two concepts could be balanced. This approach reached out the millions of women because it once again proved reassurance. Many women were doubtful that they could not leave for the work force without giving up something in their personal life. It pushed them to make the final decision to join Westinghouse and various other factories in the United States during World War
The 2016 Presidential Election was one of the craziest events in United States history. Obviously, Donald Trump won and it affected millions of people, whether it was in a good way or a bad way. In the article, “Donald Trump’s Inaugural Address Was Great”, by James Poulos, Trump was considered to be “great and logical” (Poulos). However, in the article, “Don’t Believe the Populism of Trump’s Inaugural Address. Our President is a Plutocrat”, by Ryan Cooper, Trumps is considered to be a terrible person, and he does not to deserve to be president.
By now, anyone who has paid attention to this presidential election cycle understands how Donald Trump behaves. When attacked or criticized, the GOP Presidential Nominee “counterpunches” with his own attacks and criticism which almost always come out harsher and unconventional. In the media, his responding rhetoric is largely portrayed and spun as the latest “new low” for his candidacy. To his adversaries, Trump’s response further proves their point he 's “temperamentally unfit” to be the President of the United States. For his supporters and the multitude of neutral independents, it matters less what Trump says when countering attacks.
“..Republican front-runner businessman Donald Trump, says he’ll undo Obama 's executive orders on immigration,” Article Two Sisters Two Americas by Brooke Ross states on page 11 in the New York Times Upfront April 4, 2016 edition. This has sparked outrage among people who know that most of the immigrants are good people who are trying to flee from violence that threatens to tear apart their lives. Brooke Ross helps people understand what life is like for families with a mixed-status and what we need to do about illegal immigration in her article Two Sisters Two Americas. By showing both sides of the big Democrat v Republican fight on what should be done about illegal immigration she lets people come to their own conclusions. The evidence however is firmly in favor of helping the immigrants by offering a path to
She believes that if women were given a say so, the streets would be cleaner, the food would be cleaner, and the rate of children dying from deadly diseases would drastically drop. In the next few paragraphs I will do my best to show you how Jane Addams was successful in persuading the American people that a change was necessary for the future of their children, for the future of America. When asked if Jane Addams was a neutral citizen in the face of women’s suffrage, one can easily come to the conclusion that she was not. She shows this through-out the entire document and through the significant amount of research that she puts into this document. She includes many examples in the document that show she fully supports the
In modern mass media, we see terms such as “liberal” and “conservative” get thrown around constantly. Political figures and pundits alike bitterly debate over issues such as abortion and Social Security. Presidential candidates make promises that fall in line with their political party. But most notable of all is the fact that the two biggest and most influential political parties, the Democratic Party and Republican Party, cannot seem to agree on any issue no matter how trivial or critical it may be. We hear news reports on Obamacare being despised by Republicans, or House Republicans promising to veto any form of gun control.
Immigration is often talked about due to the presidential election this year. The two presidential candidates have very different views on immigrants. The Democratic Party believes that immigrants boost our economy and they should be able to stay. Meanwhile the Republican Party believes we should kick immigrants out and build a wall between the United States and Mexico, so it is harder for people to migrate over (Walsh). Over the years the laws involving immigration have changed as the world changed.
Ms. Castelluccio reminded everyone that SRVEA and CSEA employees work together as a team. CSEA supports SRVEA in their fight to negotiate salary increases for all employees. SRVEA President Ann Katzburg thanked everyone for their attendance at the meeting and the rally. She stated there has been movement with negotiations and she is optimistic.
Florence Kelley, a 1900s reformer and advocate who worked to promote children’s rights and put an end to child labor in the United States, demonstrates appeals to logos and appeals to pathos in order to develop a passionate, powerful tone and hold the audience accountable/gain sympathy. Her organization of ideas, combined with diction that appeals to the emotions, create an influential speech that both flows logically and tugs on the heartstrings of the crowd. Initially, Kelley immediately draws her audience in, establishing the purpose of her speech and where she stands regarding the topic of child labor. She is well-organized and maintains a steady delivery of facts and statistics that help to further explain her point of view.
This years presidential debate was the last hope for either candidates to win over the heart’s of voters. This years race to be president has been filled with many different characters. Twenty three candidates in total to be exact. The final candidates being for the republican party Donald Trump, and for the democratic party Hillary Clinton. They both went back and forth at each other making sly remarks, and stating the facts to upgrade their candidacy stock.
Regarding Anderson Cooper 's town hall meeting with the three Republican candidates last night: After the meeting, Laura Ingraham made a comment on what Mr. Trump could do to encourage women (some of whom are offended by his comments, issues, and opinions) to vote for him. To paraphrase, she suggested Mr. Trump embrace the fact that there are many, many intelligent, articulate, strong women in our country - some of whom he should place on his staff to help run our country if he 's elected. What an excellent idea! The country needs to get back on track to Make America Great Again, and women should be a part of that
Political advertisement has been around almost as long as we have been holding elections, and although we hope to find honesty in commercials and other forms of advertisement, often times we are met with logical fallacies, and advertising appeals. This election year is no exception. Both republican and democratic parties have released countless commercials in attempts to win the favor and votes of the American public. Hillary Clinton is no exception, her campaign has released countless commercials thus far. In one of her latest commercials, Clinton and her campaign managers employ the skillful use of ethos, bandwagon appeal, and the hasty generalization fallacy in an attempt to win over the votes of African American and Hispanic voters during this primary.