Hillary is in her first semester of nursing school. In order to be able to complete the first semester and progress to the second, it is a requirement for that student to pass all of the nursing courses they are currently enrolled in. If the student does not pass all of the courses, they will be terminated from the program and will have to reapply to the program for the following fall semester. For one major assignment, which has to be passed in order to successfully complete the course, Hillary has the ability to submit it three different times to meet the passing requirements. She has already turned this in on two separate occasions and has failed each attempt to pass the assignment. Her final attempt to submit this assignment is due at eight …show more content…
For most people moral reasoning is based on rewards and punishments. In the first stage of moral reasoning individuals have an obedience orientation. According to Kohlberg, “An obedience orientation means believing that authority figures know what is right and wrong. Consequently, stage one individuals do what authorities say is right to avoid being punished.” (Kail & Cavanaugh, 2016, p. 292). The second stage of this level is instrumental orientation. Kohlberg states, “Instrumental orientation is when people look out for their own needs. Stage two individuals are nice to others because they expect the favor to be returned in the future.” (Kail & Cavanaugh, 2016, p. …show more content…
She got extremely tired of doing the same thing every day at her job and wanted a major change in her life. Going back to school is very hard for her because she is still continuing to work full-time hours, going to school full-time, trying to take care of her family, and is still trying to have somewhat of a social life too. She is in the postconventional level and is at stage six, which is universal ethical principles. This is the stage where a person’s moral principles dominate their reasoning. Based on this stage her decision is to go to the football game with her friend to try and relieve some of her stress. She made this decision for the purpose of herself. She is acting out of self-compassion and knows that she does not need to ignore her stress because it could lead to depression. She also knows that if she does not relieve some stress her school work could become even harder for her. Her decision was fairly easy because she always puts her moral principles above everything else and in the event that she does fail out of nursing school, she still has a stable career to fall back on and will still have the ability to support her family. In this stage, a person makes their decisions based on internal forces, moral principles, and what is best for their
I expect her academic progress to improve of her homework being
It took longer than necessary for her to reveal this important bit of information and explain that she had begun to skip classes which brought about a lack of
This prejudice had almost made her not go to the school where she had begun her protest and commitment to the
The psychology of obedience and authority “Keep quiet. Do your job.” We come across commands like this in our daily lives all the time, whether its in a workplace, an educational institution or even at home by our own parents. That’s fine and all but what’s interesting is that we follow these commands, these orders sometimes willingly, sometimes grudgingly and at times even blindly. Why do we do that?
The decisions that one makes may not always reflect one's personal beliefs. Oftentimes, many external factors lead one to make a choice that they do not agree with. This leads to the moral dilemma of when to obey a higher authority, and when to disobey. In his essay, “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem”, Erich Fromm, a psychoanalyst and philosopher, dissects both internal and external forces that drive a person to make decisions. It is important for one to become aware of these forces so they can determine the best way to respond to a situation.
As children are taught to go with what the authority tells them to do, they played along with the rules, but one thing that the children learned fast was that being on bottom most of them felt worthless and that there was no hope, yet being on top made them feel like a king and that they could do anything. A Class Divided shows perfect example of this when the teacher test the kids over their multiplication with flash cards. The children with the “correct” eye color of the day were faster when testing the flash cards, while the children with the “wrong” eye color were slower. Even Fromm’s article states that one’s obedience makes them part of the power, one feels stronger, and one cannot make an error (Fromm 127). A person felt a sense of hopeless that being on the bottom you would just get attacked and that it was best not to speak up but rather do what the authority says so that they would but obeying.
There a dozen of us stood, giddy with the feeling of accomplishment that we had passed and elated that we were done. As we received our certificate for completion of the certified nursing assistants course, we looked ahead to ponder what was going to be done with our new knowledge. We would never be together as a class again, but we would all have a special bond that would forever connect us. The course was just a start to what I had in mind for a later career, but I couldn’t imagine where I would be without it.
Obedience is a form of social influence where an individual behaves in a way as a response to an order from an authority figure. Conformity is the act of matching behaviors or beliefs to a group norm. Obedience is different from conformity because obedience occurs when a person is told to do something, whereas conformity occurs through social pressure; there is a hierarchy of power involved with obedience. Stanley Milgram studied obedience shortly after World War II when Nazi soldiers defended themselves on the basis of obedience of their superiors during the Nuremburg Trials. Milgram was interested to find if these soldiers were truly just following orders, or if they were accomplices finding a defense for their actions.
An example was given where a kid had to kill someone or be killed the hard way. He had no other option but the kill the person so he wouldn’t suffer. At first, these people follow their authority because of the fear they have but then it becomes normal for them.
Just as many feel a sense of accomplishment when successfully solving a puzzle or mastering a challenging task, obedience can fulfill that same feeling in the brain. Often times, desiring control in life is common from person to person. Obedience rewards the psychological craving for accomplishment, control, and leadership depending on the particular situation, how well that authority is monitored, and the duration of holding that authority position. Many undervalue the fact that personality traits don’t accurately depict how someone will obey (Ross/Nisbett 628).
Obedience is mean compliance with a specified order, instruction, or law observance of the rules. Normally we obey to the law, our parents or adults in the family, the teachers in the school or someone that we respect. People obey things with many reason general is based on respect because we obey our parents at home or other adults when we were child, also we don’t want to be impolite. The motivation to obey is to get things right and we don’t query for it because we don't want to get in trouble, like soldiers they obey everything as a mission because that is their job to obey to the superior and the teachers in the school, they all way tell you come to class and do the homework, honestly we don’t want to follow it but we don’t have choice,
Cognitive moral development is the critical element in the judgement phase in Rest's (1986) and Trevino's (1986) models. For Hunt and Vitell (1986) and Dubinsky and Loken (1989), moral evaluation (teleological and deontological) takes place. Ferrell and Gresham (1985) did not specify a process for this step. Rest (1986), Dubinsky and Loken (1989), and Hunt and Vitell (1986) explicitly included a step whereby the ethical decision-maker establishes moral intent before engaging in moral behaviour. Trevino (1986) and Ferrell and Gresham (1985) postulated a direct transition from the moral judgement phase to moral behaviour.
Obedience is a form of social influence where individuals “take marching orders from people who are above them in the hierarchy of authority such as a parent, teacher or boss (textbook citation)”. A prominent social psychologist of the 20th century Stanley Milgram, was renowned for his controversial obedience studies. A child of Jewish parents during the second world war, Milgram questioned how events of the Holocaust occurred, deeming it to be exceptionally immoral and underlying psychological processes giving rise to obedience. Milgram’s work was often reasoned to be a demonstration rather than an experiment yet, this wasn’t noticed by others due to the unethical methods he conducted on answering his paradigm - the causes of obedience (Burger & Jerry 2007).
Obedience is considered as following the orders that are given to you by a superior person, or someone in authority. Growing up, I was always taught to obey my parents, for which it was the right thing to do. Being obedient to a superior, or authority figure has become the norm for many individuals, to say that means obedience comes natural, without questioning, or hesitation. Once obedience is a part of the norm, requirements that are asked of you by a person of higher power isn’t so hard to follow. Though often times, we are given orders by individuals of authority which we disagree with, but because we are to be obedient to that person, we follow the orders that have been given to us.
So what does this mean for Shelby, this means that she missed out on an opportunity to further explain her ideas regarding the use of physical activity in a school