Hindu Nationalism: From a Dravidian perspective
Hindu nationalism has seen an unprecedented rise in the years following our Independence. It is odd considering the otherwise non-rigid nature of Hinduism by itself, which is not very amenable to the creation of a separate ideology around it. Yet the nationalist ideologue is stronger than ever, in fact rising with the rise of industrialization and modernization in India. How the ideologies of a predominantly upper-caste Hindutva elite was even propagated in a country as diverse as India is a study in itself, but the chief factor of this paper is the ideas that are conveniently neglected by the otherwise fervent ideologies of Hindutva as a school of thought. The idea of our origins isn’t something
…show more content…
Does this mean that there are simultaneously two clashing cultures in India at the very same time? No, since the Aryanization of the South, and the Dravidianization of the North cannot be stated enough. Sanskrit evolved as a mixture of languages, as did classical Tamil. Also, the question of society in the Eastern part of India in the same period is also a mystery. Researchers hypothesize the migration of a Southeast-Asian related ethnic group into the region around the same time as an Indo-Aryan migration. Their culture is also largely a result of the eventual mixture of all three cultures present in Eastern India, and is quite distinct from either Aryan or Dravidian culture. In a Hindu nationalist’s frame of mind, all these distinct cultures are to be shoved away, just as the influences of other religions is to be discarded. Savarkar called for a reconversion of Muslims and Christians and those of other relgions as a way of their acceptance in Hindu society. The irony is that South Indian culture is by far the biggest proof against Hindu nationalist theories. A Hindu nationalist would be loath to admit or recognize the influences of Islam in the religion they so enthusiastically propagate. A monotheistic, conservative understanding of religion that looks at culture or religion rather than racial aspects is basically a Hindu reworking of Islam. South indian culture, excluding Brahmin culture, is quite different from that of the North because one might argue that it has seen a more organic form of acceptance and assimilation of religion through natural conversion as compared to the spread of Islam by invasion in the North. Even Christianity, which is demonized as a result of the opportunism of missionaries, has coexisted peacefully alongside Hinduism and Islam in the
Nationalism and sectionalism were two powerful influences in the development of American policies and economy during the Era of Good Feelings. It is faulty to say that one was greater than the other because these two mindsets are symbiotic with one another. An increased sense of pride, nationalism, inevitably leads into developing a sense of sectionalism. The idea of nationalism, feeling that one’s country was superior to others, coincides soundly with the concept of sectionalism, where individuals view countries with an in-group and out-group mindset, or basically: “it’s us against them.” In many ways, nationalism and sectionalism are really one in the same due to the fact that during the Era of Good Feelings, Americans viewed their country
Liberal ideas were in favor of the majority in the country so it paved way for further unification as an independent state which emerged from all hierarchy. In order to defeat other powerful enemies, a strong state would have more advantages as it served as a collective defense. Nationalism accelerated the process of unification since it utilized the military force and political support from a large number of patriots and liberalists. Nationalism which was the emphasizing of the national identifying, and aspiration of independence promotes the unification of Italy and Germany because it focused on the majority’s voice in the country. James Stuart Mill, (Doc 2) who was a proponent of national identity, accentuated the necessity of a constitution
The historical lineage between the African and Asian diasporas present a reciprocal relationship of influence and experience. Throughout the passage of time, these bodies of people have been both opposing forces and allies; in response to the racial tensions surrounding their respective groups, in their corresponding environments. Interactions between Africans and Asians created a dynamic that whites often felt threatened by but also used to wield power and institute dissension among the groups. By utilizing facets of colorblindness, multiculturalism, primordialism, polyculturalism, and Afro-orientalism, racial formation will examined as it exists within the Afro-Asian dynamic. American meritocracy presents a front that states that individuals may succeed and attain power on a basis of exclusively ability and talent, regardless of other factors such as race and
Thesis Both Nationalism and Sectionalism developed concurrently during the Era of Good Feelings. The two main reasons why nationalism increased was because of Henry Clay’s American System and Monroe’s policy to increase nationalism. Clay’s AS created a better national infrastructure that tightened America together. Monroe’s policy was to promote national unity and America’s power, which strengthens nationalism.
After WWI, there were large numbers of people seeking entry into the United States. During WWI the Russian Revolution occurred, and communism became an important part of politics. Some immigrants from Europe believed in socialism and anarchy. These ideas threatened U.S. capitalism and beliefs about American freedom. Americans reacted in different ways to the events by expressing anti-immigrant nativism, a fear of communism and patriotism to attack these fears.
The Marāthās, in particular, became so enraged that they eventually gained their independence from the Mughals and established their own empire,” (Gale). The departure of the Marāthās proves the lack of religious tolerance the Mughals had at times. The Marāthās were so enraged at the lack of acceptance that they left the empire rendering it smaller and weaker. This is just one example of the Mughals not only only neglecting to practice religious tolerance, but how refusing to accept all people for their beliefs backfired in the empire’s overall growth and unity.
During the early nineteenth century the idea of nationalism was born. Nationalism is a strong feeling of pride in your country. It is the idea of one country being better than all others. Before the idea of nationalism took shape, cultures living in Europe were spread throughout large multi-cultural empires. These cultures didn't feel any ties to other people of the same culture, they only felt loyalty to the king or queen.
In addition, Nehru explained that Muslims “are of us and will remain of us whatever happens” (Document 2). Not only did Gandhi help to achieve what each religion wanted, but did so while himself and Nehru encouraged Hindus and Muslims to remain
This call for independence potentially put British assets in the region at risk, as well as, threatened access to the Suez Canal. However, perhaps most importantly, the colonial norm of wielding control over a colonized nation would be distinctly undermined at the prospect of self-determination and gaining independence from the British Empire. Consequently, despite Zaghlul’s demands being widely supported across Egypt, the British refused to recognize their calls for independence and refused to let them travel to Versailles to present their case before the convening peace conference. The Egyptian nationalists continued to use the norm of self-determination to justify their demands and gain more public recognition for their cause by using Wilson’s
In “Juan Gines de Sepulveda Belittles the Indians” (1547), the author uses the rhetorical appeals of ethos and logos to prove to the Spanish that the Indians of the New World should accept and embrace Spanish rule. The most prominent rhetorical appeal used by the author is logos, it is present even in the first sentences of the passage. Sepulveda does not waste any time getting to his point, and begins with the statement, “The Spanish have a perfect right to rule those barbarians of the New World and the adjacent islands, who...are as inferior to the Spanish as children to adults,” (3). Immediately, logos is being used by using the analogy of the natives as children and the Spanish as adults. Obviously, everyone knows that adults are superior to children, and by using this analogy Sepulveda points out that the natives are as naive as children, and need the guidance
Hinduism: Polytheistic or Monotheistic? Regarded as the 3rd largest religion in the world, originating back to 2750-1750 BCE, Hinduism is a very unique religion practiced mostly by India (80 Percent). When asking the question whether this religion is polytheistic or monotheistic, it can be said that Hinduism can really be considered both of these terms due to different aspects. Hinduism is polytheistic, meaning that this religion worships many different gods all containing different elements, but Hinduism also is monotheistic, as its origins come from one sacred book, the Bhagavad Gita. Hinduism worshipers believe in many different gods, and worshipers participate in different pujas (rituals) to these gods.
Serbian Nationalism and the First World War Nationalism is a patriotic feeling, common to a whole nation. Historians tend to blame the actions that lead to the Great War on the nationalism of the nations in Europe, which lead to international tensions. It made countries feel superior and also gave them the desire for political independence. In the Balkans, it was Serbian nationalism that was significant to the outbreak of the war. (“Nationalism”)
Religion and Philosophy Collection, go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=GPS&sw=w&u=ko_k12hs_d71&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA130047610&asid=b32ed7e0f51af43dc7e6fb2823603de1. In this article, Christopher Key Chapple summarized the main components of Hinduism and what matters most to them based on their religious beliefs. Hinduism is much different than our religion however, the author grabbed the main points about Hinduism and its ecology to give a better understanding for me, the reader. This article touches on the dynamic, multicultural society of Hinduism.
Antagonism can be defined as active hostility or opposition. India has a long tradition of religious tension. One of the most significant sustained religious conflicts has been between the Hindus and Muslims. This essay will focus on the causes of the Hindu-Muslim antagonism, and will at same time assess the quote of Sir S.A Khan. 1.
IMPACT OF BRITISH WESTERNISATION ON INDIA Srikanth P Y(13BBT0058) Manideep Reddy(13BCE0 ABSTRACT: According to M.N.SRINIVAS westernisation in Indian terms refers to the effect of British culture in the Indian society.