Hamilton: An American Musical has taken the world by storm. The musical presents the history of Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr, but the story is told by using hip hop music. It would be naïve to believe that Hamilton is completely factually accurate, especially since hip hop did not even exist at the time of Hamilton and Burr. However, the “history” of Hamilton is a subject of debate. Should a historical musical be historically accurate? Is theatre the right medium to share history? Both Professor Tara Helfman and historian Nancy Isenberg have weighed in on the subject and here we will consider their perspectives on the importance of historical accuracy and the use of art to share history. The authors agree on the significance of Hamilton; …show more content…
“Hamilton is being performed as American institutions are being convulsed by a collective identity crisis over how to reconcile the realities of the past with the ideals of the present” (Helfman, 37). Helfman is right that Hamilton is important because it embodies the American Spirit. The founding fathers were Caucasian men of great status. One way that Helfman appreciates the changes made to the history is with the casting. The cast in the show is portraying mostly Caucasian characters, but nearly the entire cast are performers of color. I wholeheartedly agree that this change allows us to see the founding fathers as complex, imperfect individuals (Helfman, 38). If the Founding Fathers in the play were portrayed by Caucasian white males, I doubt the play would have the impact or power that is does possess. The cast is dynamic, inclusive, and representative of the world we live in today. Helfman also celebrates the creativity used in the musical to share some of the dark sides of Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton raps about the highly public infidelity situation he finds himself in, and only moments later we see his wife burning their love letters while singing about the heartbreak she feels from his betrayal. Helfman is right that the story of the history is more importance than the accuracy. Hamilton is not 100% true, but it is 100% effective in bringing this story back to …show more content…
This is a statement that I agree with whole heartedly. The show uses music and dramatic license to tell the story of Alexander Hamilton. This is a story that allows us to find a bit of ourselves in a historical character. Hamilton, Helfman argues, is at its best when it is using music and storytelling to show just how improbable the American Experiment was (39). Theatre is able to allow us new ways to tell a story. Many people would say that a hip hop musical about the Founding Fathers is a terrible idea. I would argue that the idea is original, creative, and marketable. Being able to watch a story like this play out makes it more memorable for an audience. Seeing Hamilton’s wife burning love letters from her husband (though not factually accurate), allows us to feel the story and history. There are people that are upset that things are missing from this story, but a musical can’t be 16 hours long. There has to be compression of the life in order to keep the story moving and to allow for maximum impact. Helfman says, “Miranda’s masterwork captures in unlikely and innovative ways the electrifying synthesis that has animated American history since the Founding. To the extent that Hamilton succeeds in sending Americans back to their roots at a time when too many are quick to tear them up and cast them aside, this work of art accomplishes more than a formal work of history ever could” (39). In other words, art is a terrific
Although the two Founding Fathers were both similar in a majority of their thoughts, the tiny differences between the two highlight a larger part of the nation’s history. Hamilton believed
Throughout the revolution Hamilton was very politically involved and produced many essays that
“Hamilton” is a popular musical created by Lin-Manuel Marinda, based on the political career of Alexander Hamilton, one of the founding fathers of the United States, but is not completely and truly told leaving misconceptions about some things to be left floating around. Regardless of its praise and success, some viewers of the musical could experience misconceptions and confusion about the events that led to the famous duel between Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton. Although the musical accurately presents many historical facts and personal characteristics of the characters, the portrayal of events and characters’ personalities could lead to a misrepresentation of the events that affected the outcome of the duel. The portrayal of Burr could also cause confusion and misconceptions about his true intentions,
Although no one will ever know exactly what happened during the duel, Ellis points out that it forever changed the life of Burr. Burr’s decisions ruined his chance at being a leading man in the government and therefore influenced who would pick up where Burr had left off. This situation emphasizes Ellis’s argument that men make history. Ellis not only uses stories to prove his point; he also used a chart to make his facts easy to
Through a combination of killer rhymes and power ballads, Lin-Manuel Miranda, the creator and star of the show, presents history as a story to be shared with the living, rather than solely the facts of the dead. This masterpiece reminds its viewers to never disregard the emotions
When broadway playwright, composer, and performer Lin-Manuel Miranda went on a much needed vacation after his musical In The Heights finished its run on broadway, he picked up a biography that would change both his life and the face of theatre. When reading “Alexander Hamilton” by Ron Chernow, Miranda started formulating a musical about the “ten dollar founding father without a father,” which is now dominating Broadway almost five years later. The show focuses on often over-looked founding father Alexander Hamilton, the face on the $10 bill, who Miranda calls the “original immigrant.” Orphan Hamilton came to the United States after living a destitute life in the Caribbean, seeking an education and a way to survive.
He was able to combine an idea and politics. Hamilton is the reason the two are so closely tied together, and in doing this, he is known as the man who made modern America. He also envisioned America to have large debts, military force, and a modern economy with the large government. This is why Hamilton is probably the only who would understand America today. These are just some of the examples that Wood gives throughout the book that entail the difference in the Founders and todays
Hamilton, in the way he shaped the government, is considered rather shady, for lack of a better word; he took any methods to get what needed to be done, done. This was what typically led to the Jeffersonians’ attacks on him: not only were his actions, at times, difficult to justify, but they made him an easy target for the preying Jeffersonians. If we are to judge the parties solely by their figureheads, then we must take into account Jefferson himself, rather than basing our opinions of the Federalists on Hamilton’s ruthlessness and then taking an angle that makes the Jeffersonians Hamilton’s complete opposites. For all of Hamilton’s low points, it must be remembered that Jefferson was not so noble himself: the ideological differences between Federalists and Jeffersonians brought out the worst in the Founders. The fear of the “Hamiltonian juggernaut,” running a successful development of the nation’s government, was what triggered Jefferson’s increasingly vengeful moves against him and the Federalists.
Alexander Hamilton (2004) is a detailed true story of one of the most important figures in American history. It is based on Hamilton’s early life. As a politician, as a revolutionary war hero, and the first treasury secretary, Hamilton dedicated his life and intellect to unifying and strengthening the United States. Hamilton in truth did perhaps more than any other one person to secure the power of the American Union. Though he was never president, he was a hero deemed as a true founding father, title he kept till his death.
Hamilton is a hip hop, rap musical about one of America's founding fathers, Alexander Hamilton and includes music from Lin Manuel Miranda. Hamilton is about Alexander Hamilton determined to make his mark in America. He goes from an orphan to Washington's right hand man to a rebel to a war hero. He even becomes the first Treasurer of America. Miranda first presented “Alexander” to President Obama during a poetry jam.
Lin-Manuel Miranda and His Influence on Modern Musical Theatre Many people would consider Tony Award winning composer, lyricist, and actor Lin-Manuel Miranda a genius. With his musicals In the Heights and Hamilton, Miranda has been able to relate to modern audiences. His innovative uses of hip-hop, diverse casts, and commentary about race and immigration in his musicals allow his works to stand out amongst other modern Broadway shows.
Very few entertainments of the past decade have earned the term cultural phenomenon more than the Broadway show Hamilton: An American Musical. Lin-Manuel Miranda, creator of Hamilton, captivates audiences through enthralling lyrics and imagery while also telling the multiperspective story of Alexander Hamilton and his role in building America. In order to do so, Miranda draws on Ron Chernow’s Alexander Hamilton throughout the musical especially in his songs “Non-Stop” and “The World Was Wide Enough”. Miranda’s method of portraying history to his audience is directly affected by his choice to include and omit certain information from the musical.
I read your article criticizing Hamilton after you mentioned it to me after class. I know in 3319 you’ve discussed The Patriot, and you mention HBO’s John Adams often. After talking with you about Burr by Gore Vidal, and other historical fiction novels, I’m interested in your opinion on what place, if any, dramatized history has in our society. I know you’re a passionate proponent of “real” history, but do you think we should collectively disregard any form of dramatic history as harmful? I’ve always loved the Narratives of Empire series by Vidal, but after considering the idea of reading too much into the “history” inside the novels, I can see where the lines between what's fact and fiction can be blurred.
An American Musical and 1776 are both critically acclaimed musicals; however, despite covering the same historical period, they do so with differences. To begin, Hamilton and 1776 each contain a handful of historical inaccuracies to either further the plot or to make writing more convenient for the playwright. The main point where Hamilton strays from history is that every lead character in the show is played by a person of color, whereas, historically all of the people portrayed were white. Also, Angelica Schuyler, Alexander Hamilton’s sister-in-law with whom he had an emotional affair with, was already married when the two met. In the show, Angelica gets married after her sister, Eliza Schuyler, and Hamilton are already married.
This performances style of postmodernism causes the audience to question whether any of the alternate realties would have a different outcome or whether any of this matters this sort of view questioning leaves the audience with a deeper connection to the story and characters which has been done to a near perfect extent making you feel as if you are a part of this story. Questioning leaves audiences open to discuss with the meaning of this performance maybe even coming up with their own alternate view, this effectiveness to get people talking helps the whole postmodern style in achieving its goal of enlightening its audience with different