Hiroshima Bombing Argumentative Essay

797 Words4 Pages
The atomic bomb was a terrible thing. It killed 150,000 in Hiroshima and 75,000 in Nagasaki, plus many survivors became horribly disfigured from the intensive heat, and death from radiation is uncertain it may not kill the victims for days, weeks, months, or even years. (Although the bomb did save the USA from sending foot soldier to Japan, the Japanese were ready to surrender on terms that they can keep their empire and we had no need to use it). Japan was the first to feel the destructive power of the atomic bomb. Killing a quarter of a million people and costing two billion dollars of war replenish. The only argument supporting the use of the atomic bomb is it saved american lives, that could have died in the mainland of japan. In an article by literary scholar and WWII infantryman Paul Fussell, who was scheduled to go to Japan. In an article by literary scholar and WWII infantryman Paul Fussell, who was scheduled to go to Japan. He told reporters. "I would have died!" (Mason, 2014). If the bomb did not dropped and Japan did not surrender like they did. Paul was not the only one who would have died many more than 267,000 other soldiers could have died invading Japan. Japan train normal people to fight if ever the US soldier touches the ground. In his 1944 "emergency declaration," Prime Minister Hideki Tajo had called for "100…show more content…
The US used the A-bomb to save its soldier, which could have been lost. Japan planning to surrender to the Russian but only if there can keep their emperor making The atomic bomb pointless. With many military leaders on point, agreeing that dropping the atomic bomb was unnecessary. Only president Truman could have made the choice to try to save American lives but in saving them, he will be kill millions of innocent people. Imagined being in President Truman shoes try to make the choice of whether or not to press the big red
Open Document