There are several theories of Intelligence ranging from whether intelligence should be measured by one test or whether one can measure intelligence in several tests. Intelligence has been defined as the ability to learn from experience, solve problems, and use knowledge to adapt to new situations. Since the surroundings we live in affect our experiences, then our intelligence naturally has to vary across cultures and time. Learning from our experiences and solving problem while living in the heat of Dubai for example will require different skills and knowledge for optimal living to someone living in the Amazon rain forest where they may have to understand the medicinal qualities of local plants. One of the ways to understand intelligence is to compare and contrast the historical and contemporary …show more content…
Gardner for example classified intelligence into eight independent intelligences which include a broad range of skills beyond traditional school smarts. Gardner’s eight intelligences can see the skill of people with savant syndrome for example as showing brilliance even when other areas of the brain may be compromised. In this theory, although Nathaniel Ayers lacked the ability to reason in some areas such as when he was with a priest praying people and looked confused or when he was talking to Mr. Lopez and suddenly sees a plane in the sky and asks Mr. Lopez if he was flying that plane, this theory could find Nathaniel Ayers other areas of strength without being labeled as unintelligent. Ayers could play a full musical score without looking at any music to perfect timing and tune like no other person and played instrument like the violin without any formal training. Because Gardner sees an individual’s intelligence as made up of multiple intelligences, the brilliance of Ayers could be measured and appreciated as contributing to his overall intelligence
1 Westinghouse Alexandra Westinghouse Professor ? Interdisciplinary Studies 101 ? February 2017 An Analysis of Gladwell?s ?
IQ while a good evaluation of a persons ability to solve logic problems is not the epitome of intelligence. If you have IQ with out practical or social intelligence in a significant quantity it wont garner you much success in the world. It needs an addition of that practical or social intelligence in order for you to become exceptionally successful within the world. The examples put forth in the book are of Chris Langan who’s IQ was in the 190 to 200’s range, Terman’s Termites (a group of students with IQ’s of 140+ that Terman followed for his Genetic Studies of Genius.), and Robert Oppenheimer. We also have two differing tests one that touches on just IQ and the other that touches on practical intelligence.
In Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell, discuss that “If intelligence matters only up to a point, then past that point, other things – things that have nothing to do with intelligence – must start to matter more,” (86). “To be a Nobel Prize winner apparently, you have to be smart enough to get into at least as good as Notre Dame or the University of Illinois. That’s all,” (Gladwell 83). The author is explaining that getting to the well-known university doesn’t means you’re likely going to win a Nobel Prize.
Intelligence is what gets us by everyday; it gets us jobs and helps to provide for ourselves and others. I'm not saying you need to be the smartest person ever to be successful, but you at least have to be smart enough. Gladwell mentions that "Langan’s IQ is 30 percent higher than Einstein’s. But that doesn’t mean Langan is 30 percent smarter than Einstein. That’s ridiculous.
Older generations tend to believe that young adults, who are thirty years old or younger, are the “dumbest generation” ever. However, these young adults are not actually dumb, they are able to think more critically and deeper which helps them gain more knowledge and become more intelligent. It is invalid to compare the past with the present because in the present, technology and other developments are far more superior. Many people have shown themselves to be smarter than the older generation due to technological developments, and the increased use of technology. Sharon Begley stated that IQ scores “ have been rising since the 1930s” and these “tests measure not knowledge but pure thinking capacity” (Begley, Source 2).
Mike Rose disagrees with the assumption that “Intelligence is closely associated with formal education” (Mike, 247). Formal education does not always measure the level of intelligence of a person. Education as something people can gain not only in school, but every day of their lives. We should be learning from our experiences, and apply this knowledge to our everyday lives. Wisdom should not be looked at as just
Standardized intelligence testing has been one of psychology’s ultimate achievements. “Intelligence tests are psychological tests that are designed to measure a variety of mental functions, such as reasoning, comprehension, and judgment.” ("Intelligence tests," n.d.) They can help diagnose knowledgeable disabilities or measures a person’s knowledgeable potential. Alfred Binet was the first French Psychologist who created the first intelligence test in the 1900s.
In today’s society people often correlate test scores and percentages to how intelligent a person is. Although, I believe intelligence is also a mix of experiences, I strive to control what people judge me on, which is calculated numbers.
The two intelligences that are taught in schools are logical/mathematical intelligence and verbal/linguistic intelligence. 3. The other five include spatial, musical, kinesthetic, interpersonal and intrapersonal which are all incredibly important in order to function in today’s society. II. The pressure that is applied by standardized testing is unhealthy to a learning environment.
“The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge, but imagination,”(Einstein). Most people do not realize grades do not measure intelligence and age does not define maturity. The short story, Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes, is about a thirty-seven year old man named Charlie Gordon. He is a mentally disabled man who has an IQ of 68. As the subject of an experiment in human engineering, Charlie earns artificial intelligence that triples his IQ to 200; but this action came with more costs than benefits.
Disadvantages/weaknesses of Howard Gardner’s theory: 1. Doesn’t explain why some individuals are more intelligent than others. 2. Controversy over whether the seven specific types of intelligences are actually intelligences or whether they are abilities (such as musical, body-kinesthetic, interpersonal and intrapersonal).
Introduction It is very important to study about the development of the human. Because it provides framework to think about human growth, their mental development, and the most important one, ‘their learning’. As a teacher it is very important to study about these theories. Because it have a close relationship with the development of the students and their learning behavior (Michael, 2012) .
Nature vs. Nurture Extra Credit The debate in psychology whether and to what extent our aspects of behavior are either genetic or learned characteristics has been going on for a long time. Genetic is the nature side of the argument. Learned refers to the nurture side of this long debate.
Leadership is the process of influencing activates of an organized group toward goal achievement. In other words doing jobs through other people, however to be able to do so, a leader need to have a certain level of emotional intelligence, which is the ability to be aware and express emotions, and further to be able to handle personal relationships carefully and empathetically. The five main domains of emotional intelligence are; knowing your emotions (Self Awareness), managing your own emotions (Self-Regulation), motivating yourself (Motivation), Recognizing and understanding other people’s emotions (Empathy) and Managing relationships (Social Skills) Furthermore we will discuss the different emotional intelligence theories that have been
Hebb thought of a theory which attempted to acknowledge the influence of both genetics and environmental influences on child intelligence; the notion Intelligence A and Intelligence B. Intelligence A is regarding the individual's potential attainable intelligence inherited through their genes. Intelligence B is how far this genetic potential can reach as a result of the child's experience in their environment. Vernon added Intelligence C to these, which takes into account that intelligence tests only measure a part of someone's intelligence B, so intelligence C is the unknown amount of intelligence which is measured in an IQ test. Some theoriests have much more extreme theories, eg.