Cultures are very important in understanding them in a work environment.
Since always national cultures have always generated different cultural value systems.
Value systems are normally generated by different factors such as :a specific coception or specific beliefs which can be shaping a particular society.
Cultures can differ from each other and each of them have different standards such as different behaviors towards a scene,traditions or even the way the comunication is dealt.
These type of standards can sometimes be seen irrelevant by some people or even a threat by others bringing sometimes cultural gaps in a worforce.
In a work environement,the vast variety of culural structures interacting togheter can increase the probability of
…show more content…
Hofstede’s Dimensions of Culture The first approach that I will talk about is the Culture dimensions made by Professor Geert Hofstede.
Hofstede is a dutch man who has developed a model which interpretates the cultural diversity, known as the Hofstede Dimension of Culture Model.
The model is based on a statistical research which was begun by Hofstede in the early '70s and is still constantly updated.
The first research was conducted based on 116,000 questionnaires in about fifty countries and nowadays the available data is concerning approxametly hundred countries.
The Hofstede model is the only approach of its kind that uses a statistical approach based on a so vast mass of data.
The Hofstede model is internationally recognized as a reference point for anyone who approaches to issues where cultural differences come into play.
In summary, the model identifies five dimensions.
For each country examined, the model indicates whether the value is generally present within the observed culture and a measure which shows how high or low the value is.
The main site of Hofstede offers as well the opportunity to compare between other
…show more content…
Trompenaars has classified national culture within a system of dimensions, some of which are retracable to the model made by Geert Hofstede.
Trompenaars has focused on the management of culture, in order to enrich the knowledge between western and eastern mentalities.
Compared to the approach adopted by Hofstede,Fons Trompenaars has made a more detailed and has given a major importance in the dimensions made by Hofstede.
Trompenaars has defined culture as "the way a human group solve its problems".
As stated before Trompenaars has took the theory of Hofstede and modified it with the contribution of Charles Hampden-Turner.
Fons Trompenaars has made the 7 dimensions of cultural.
The model of Trompenaars is a mix between organizational and national cultures.
Trompenaars to create the theory, he has used a database containing approximately more than 30000 surveys.
The 7 cultural dimensions are :
1. Universalism vs. Particularism
2. Individualism vs. Collectivism
3. Neutral vs. Affective
Fat acceptance: A basic primer Critique essay Cynara Geissler’s article “Fat Acceptance: A Basic Primer” was first published in Geez Magazine in 2013. Geissler addresses a lot of issues about fat acceptance and how it is affecting our society and people’s attitudes towards over-weight people. One of the reasons why Geissler thinks that is because many health industries now days have a slogan “Thinner is better” and that makes over-weight people seem lazy or just not willing to put the effort to become better. Most importantly Geissler mentions that health industries and causing people to make a negative attitude towards overweight people which can be seen.
Juan Gomez Quinones, historian and scholar defines culture as a “central concept” that all people share. That concept varies from the group’s behaviorism, habits and beliefs. Quinones believe that factors such as “culture, history, and nationality” are all interconnected which gives people a common ground. Quinone’s calculated language on his concept of culture invokes a sense of similarity and trivial connection between humans. Instead of describing how diverse culture separates people, Quinone’s embraces the ability of diversity to bind people to one large community.
Every day we use our culture. Whether it be to argue claims, express opinions, or make decisions, culture plays a part in each area. Culture is who we are, one’s identity, its extent is enormous over our views and actions. A person grows up surrounded with culture at a young age. This can affect how they learn and what they learn.
Cultural factors are sets of beliefs, values, and guidelines for individuals’ behaviors. These beliefs are often shared and discussed by a certain group of people. These groups of people may be influenced by culture, ethnicity, race, religion, economics, and an individual’s routines. In other words, it is safe to say that not all cultural groups will share the same views on specific beliefs, values, and/or guidelines. For instance, there are many cultural beliefs held in America, which may have affected Jeanette’s development into an independent and intelligent woman.
When researching information about Haiti’s cultural dimensions, there wasn’t a significant amount of data available. However, a cultural dimension model will be developed based on personal research(Appendix D). Geert Hofstede’s cultural dimension model is a five-dimension model that rates countries from 1 to 100 based on certain criteria such as power distance, individual vs. collectivism, masculinity vs. femininity, uncertainty avoidance, and long-term orientation. When looking at power distance, which measures how evenly power is distributed and the influence that one has over another, Haiti is assessed at 50.
Individualism versus Collectivism: This element of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions describes if the primary function of a person in a society is more being an individual or part of the group of a society. In individualistic societies people follow their own interest very strictly and are relatively loose on societal morals. Competition in these societies is normal, the ideology exists that people who compete the best are rewarded financially. Examples for strong individual societies are: Canada, Australia and the United States.
Every society makes its own culture based on their language, religion, science, conventions, eating, wearing customs and social life. The culture also takes shape and undergoes change in time. This development can be in a short or long period. When the effects on cultures are taken into consideration, classifications
Piedad Molina Professor Ana Hernandez LIT 2480 October 7, 2015 Culture is the set of traditions, beliefs, and values, which are characteristic of a certain population. Each country or region has different parameters to determine their culture. The predominant values in the population, the language spoken, religious beliefs, and the way they dress; all these manners influence in the creation of a culture and what is autonomous of its region. Within a country we can find different cultures or ethnicities, social status, education and region make a population differ from another. The exchange of cultural ideas, beliefs, and values with the youngest members of the community make it possible for a culture to survive and to keep the legacy.
However, it could be rationalized that the reason for shallow review of different models is the incorrectly perception of race and ethnicity as the main features of cultural variety. Nevertheless, we should note that despite the fact that race and ethnicity are the two most obvious features of cultural variation, other factors such as religion, education, profession, and sexuality might bear inevitable
Since Hong Kong and China are having different culture, and there are many news report that the conflict between Hong Kong people and Chinese, so it affects the way Hong Kong people interact with and perceive the mainland today. For the theoretical review, Hofstede compared to the cultural as onion. In other words, there are many layers that differentiate Symbols, Heroes, Rituals, Values and from outside to the inside. The Onion Model, there are a number of interpretations of this model and the simplest one consists of four key layers.
Neher wk 2, Ruth (1 day late – vacation) In this section, I am choosing China to do my research of the cultural dimensions. Individualism and Collectivism in China are not even considered. Individualism is about ones self and doing what needs to be done for yourself not others, based on independence. Collectivism is based on group goals rather than individual goals.
Up until now, I have had very little cross-cultural experience in the course of my life. Beginning with the fact that both of my parents are Dutch and the fact that I grew up here, made me a fully Dutch citizen, both in terms of origin and education. I am born and raised in a small village in the Netherlands, called Bodegraven. My parents have not provided me with a cross-cultural background as they both grew up on Dutch farms. However, they took me on holidays to several countries in Europe and to Canada and America once.
1) What are the cultural dimensions Hofstede proposes? Please include a definition of each and how is each one rated? The Cultural dimensions Hofstede proposes are four dimensions that represent elements of common structure in the cultural systems of the countries. They are based on four very fundamental issues in human societies to which every society should find its answers.
Hofstede analysis of culture considering the gender would give a different
Culture is comprise of religion values ,economy ,languages ,class ,material items ,social institutions ,customs ,manners ,education, policies and attitudes (Czinkota & Ronkainen ,1993).Kirkman and Shapiro (2001) described that cultural diversity affect the management styles .He stated that managers with different cultural backgrounds showed different behavior, attitudes, beliefs and basic values. Moveoneinc (2013) stated that culture has prodigious impact over the management style. For example, in Japanese firms almost all employees are participating in the process of decision making. But in the society of America, only top management is involved in the decision making of important and vital matters. In the same way, reward systems are designed on individual performance in western countries and America whereas individual performance has less significance in Japanese firms.