In the last few decades, scholars produced some works in attempt to give a picture of the social structure of Hong Kong. For the first part, Lau Siu-kai’s utilitarianistic familism thesis, the class analysis work done by Thomas Wong and Lui Tai-lok, and the works of Annie Hau-nung Chan and Eric Kit-wai Ma will be outlined. For the second part, the extent to which Lau’s thesis and class analysis can be used to understand the social structure of Hong Kong will be assessed. The ideology of utilitarianistic familism suggests that the hierarchical structure with the power elite at the top, and the mass of isolated familial groups in the bottom formed the minimally integrated social-political society of Hong Kong (Lau 1978, 29). The thesis mainly …show more content…
As stated previously, family served the function of social integration and services and assistances are exchanged within family. Nowadays, various social services, including childcare, tutoring, domestic helpers, etc., are available in the society; these services free up the time of parents, and have taken over some of the functions of the family. As a result, the working parents will have more time spent with their colleagues with similar background instead of contributing all their time to the family. The whole family is then integrated with the society and is no longer isolated. In this sense, one of the essential parts, i.e. the mass of isolated familial groups, no longer exist, or at least, isolated familial groups have become the minority of the society. Furthermore, in 2003, 500 thousand marchers joined the 1 July protest opposing the Basic Law Article 23. 1 July marches were organized in every subsequent years, mainly demanding for democracy. This is a significant evidence proving that Hong Kong people started to participate in social movements; they protested and protected the value of themselves. More than often, conflicts occurred within family due to different political …show more content…
The aforementioned examples showed that the class analysis is more applicable and better reflects the thoughts of Hong Kong people. It is very likely that class differences will remain in the future, hence to a large extent class analysis can be considered as the better alternative to the utilitarianistic familism thesis in understanding the social structure of Hong
As we can see in the chapters before the family dynamics was completely different in a sense of being together all the time, doing chores and farming together. As the country started to develop more and more, families only saw each other after working a job from 9-5pm. As Divine states, “in factories and working offices family members rarely worked together”(Divine, page 449). The families were divided in a working class family as the city life progressed. For working class families this had to take a toll on children because in a natural setting children would be at school for most of the time while their parents worked.
However Beard’s application that class is the strongest faction while “neither moral nor religious motives can be relied on” (Beard) is inaccurate. Although class has been and always will be the cause of different views, it is the combination of different identities such as geographic location that create a
As humans we are all not created equally. We have our distinct unique qualities that make us who we are. Yet despite this in today’s society we are constantly pointing out our differences. These differences can take on a variety of several different forms. Race, gender, income are significant differences that we are often defined by.
The upper classes are more conservative and the lower classes are more radical on economic, political and social issues as these terms are normally defined. The greater the wealth and the higher, the social standing, the stronger, the desire to present change. The occupational progression from conservative to radical is large business, small business, professional, white collar, skilled manual, semi-skilled manual, an unskilled manual. This attachment of the upper and middle classes to the status quo indicates a general satisfaction with existing political and legal processes for gaining desired ends. Lack of such attachment on the part of lower class is an equally clear indication of doubts about the effectiveness of the processes of their own purposes.
Moreover, this is because, “women are more likely to have a relational orientation than men” (Campos, Aquilera, Ullman, & Schetter, 2014, p. 192). Women are usually the ones that maintain the family bonds and benefit more of the closeness and support from the family. Nevertheless, women still feel more compromised of keeping the bond, and if an issue surges they are more likely to stress due to the conflict (Campos, Aquilera, Ullman, & Schetter, 2014). • Around the world, it appears familism is coming to an end. What are the economic, political and cultural implications of the changes underway in the traditional family unit?
Class is a social system of hierarchy based on economic wealth. Joseph O. Jewell, author of Race, Social Reform, and the Making of a Middle Class: The American Missionary Association and Black Atlanta, 1870-1900, explains class as to “exist in large part as cultures-shared set of rules, ideologies, or
Born in Vancouver 1921, John Porter shattered the conventional image of Canada as a classless society and demonstrated the ethical inequality within our culture. In his research book The Vertical Mosaic, he proved Canada to be a highly stratified society. Important to the development of Canadian sociology, The Vertical Mosaic, provided Canadians with a reality check, unveiling the fact that our projected image is opposite to factuality and revealed the discrimination within power in our society. Within our current capitalistic society, people tend to disregard class and Canada is still viewed as a middle class society with ethnic inequality still as a ruling issue.
This is an important task from a sociological point of view as being well read in various sociological and political ideologies aids one in forming one’s own opinions. 1. Class struggles are a fundamental part of human history:
Different periods throughout China’s history have different names, known as dynasties, for the diverse positions within its society. Theoretically, all of the periods are similar, with the government and military officials ranking high in the hierarchy, and the average everyday people being under regular Chinese law. Throughout China’s history, the society has been organized into a hierarchic system of socio-economic classes, known as the four occupations. The four occupations system seems to have become distorted after the commercialization of Chinese culture during the Song Dynasty. Even though the social rankings within the country are not as predominant as they once were, the people living within the country still know their “place” within the society.
There’s no typical family as nuclear families as in the past and not everyone lives in a multigenerational household. Same-sex families are also on the rise as sexual ambiguity is undergoing its own wave of acceptance in all political, social, and economic spheres. With the absence of the parents’ presence in the home due to an inability effectively balance work and home life, children could develop an emotional void/absence. Good communicative dialogue between children and their parents where the adults describe their work situation as it relates to the home to create resilient children, could possibly benefit the household.
Suppose a conductor is driving his train and the breaks are defect. The rails lead directly into a cluster of five people who would all die if the train will go this direction. However, the conductor can change onto another track where only one person is standing hence only one person would die. How should the conductor react (Hare, 1964)? Is it possible to condense the problem to a rather simple maximization problem in example that the action is taken, which would kill the least people?
The positive side of Murdock’s view is that is show an insight to the importance of families, as it critically examines its functions in society. Another functionalist perspective of family comes from Parsons, who believes that the functions a family has to perform will affect its shape or structure. Parsons looks at two types of family structures, the nuclear family and the extended family. His argument on extended family was that extended family has multiple functions, consumption and production included, whilst the nuclear family seemed to fit the needs of modern
American Families Today The American family has undergone many changes since the 1900’s. More so, in the past 40 years, the nuclear family seen dramatic changes and has been described as deteriorating. There has been a dramatic rise in divorce, single parent households and child poverty. Studies have shown that children growing up in poverty-stricken single parent households are more likely to be affected well into adulthood. While this is the case, people are also living longer, and families are accommodating this change by living with relatives allowing for more bonding time then in previous generations.
Introduction In this case study, it analyse how the concept of family has changed in the past 20 years as it will be depicting modern family forms and past norms. It is important to look at how families have developed throughout the years up until the 21st century as we compare the two and elaborate on the difference and what makes it so significant. In this case study, it contrast and compare the television series Modern family which is a 21st century concept of family and The Simpsons which was adapted 27 years ago and how things have changed with family dynamics and what is the norm now which was not the norm years ago.
Social classes are a form of social stratification that refers to the existence of structured inequalities between individuals and groups in society. A social class is a group of people of comparable status, power and wealth which are usually classified as upper class, middle class, and lower class. For each class, there are some specific opportunities available that influence their social life. We can understand about the particularity of the chances through unequal distribution of these opportunities between individuals in social classes. In here belonging to a social class seems to be an obstacle for some individuals to obtain equal opportunity, unlike upper class people.