Fear breeds dishonesty and dishonesty breeds dishonor. Today's students often find themselves as unwilling informants and police officers, serving as honor watchdogs upon their own classmates out of fear of the consequences they will face if they don't. This student on student judgement solely cultivates a culture of distrust and suspicion instead of one of honor, integrity and respect. For the honor system to be truly effective, it must be revised to have classmates solely serve as each others judges, through honor councils. The honor code itself also must be redefined so that it can serve as a guideline of the values members of the community should uphold, instead of a system of rigid rules and consequences and do’s and don’ts, meant to terrify …show more content…
As stated in Source B, students from Lawrence Academy did not feel comfortable reporting their friends and rejected an honor code proposal completely until this provision was amended. This unwillingness to police friends is a pattern that I see in my own high school, and in the high schools of my friends across the country. Not only do students not feel comfortable reporting honor code infractions committed by their classmates, in a survey (Source E), only 8% admitted they ever would. This illustrates another fundamental issue. The honor code is constantly being broken by those who refuse to report their classmates. This constant, knowledgable breaking of the honor code not only strips the honor code of its true meaning, it demonizes it into something unfair and unjust. Therefore, in order for the honor code to retain its intended meaning, it must be amended to not penalize students who do not report their classmates but instead, to have students serve as judges in honor councils. This implementation of honor councils would allow peers to recognize the true cost of their actions without demonizing the values of the honor code as well as assist in redefining what the honor code truly …show more content…
The honor code is often viewed with disdain by students who see its purpose solely as another set of rules to dutifully abide by. Administrators see it as a way to prevent cheating as seen through Source F where it states, “a number of colleges have found effective ways to reduce cheating and plagiarism… many of these colleges employ academic honor codes to accomplish these objectives.” This philosophy itself demonstrates a major flaw in the major purpose behind the honor code. The purpose of implementing an honor code should not be to eliminate cheating through making examples out of, mainly through expulsion and suspension, those who act with academic dishonesty. The purpose of the honor code should be above all, to foster a community where values such as integrity, honesty and respect are held in the highest regard. Though signing a piece of paper will most likely not result in the immediate adoption of such qualities, an honor code should seek to remind students of the morals they have promised their school, their friends and their family to live by. It is necessary to have an honor code as it reminds students not of the consequences that come with cheating, but of the importance of the morals and the values that they have promised to
At Ballou Senior High, a crime-infested school in Washington, D.C., honor students have learned to keep their heads down. Among the mere handful of students with a B average or better, some plead to have their names left off the "Wall of Honor" bulletin board; others hide during awards ceremonies; only a few dare to raise their hands in class. Like most inner-city kids, they know that any special attention in a place this dangerous can make you a target of violence.
Students cannot be trusted when it comes to their work and it definitely can 't be trusted when it comes to honoring a code that is dependent on students having the discipline and integrity to uphold it. I see having an Honor Code as just another wall that students would eventually tear down and bury in their dus on the way to what they
Not so long ago, the honor code system was brought up to the U.S. Senate whether if it’s best to have it input schools to lessen cheating behaviors from students. It was not welcomed at first for those that were against the honor codes and as well of the people in the Senate. Even though after all the revisions and such, some voted to agree to have the codes set in place that would be good enough to have around in school; albeit honor codes don’t always work around schools, and cheating or some type of academic dishonesty will always happen— it’s inevitable. It seems by having these honor codes set in place, it would oppose the cheating and consequences against students. As the ones who have voted for the honor code wanted that safe, confidential, and knowing that their hard work and knowledge wasn’t used against them.
There are some obvious problems with the different enforcement strategies though; when relying on students to report other peers, one would also have to consider the honesty of the reporting student, not only that but student enforcement of rules is out of their responsibility. In Source B, Alyssa Vangellia addressed that “The Earlier drafts of the honor code included specific penalties for violations of the honor code, which many students opposed. Students were expected to report or confront a fellow student if they knew that he/she had cheated, lied, or stolen. Failure to confront a student would result in a period of probation. Students opposed this obligation to take action against another student because they did not see it as their responsibility.
There is an ongoing debate about whether or not the honor code, a code that obliges students to report academic dishonesty of their fellow peers, is strict enough, with many students claiming they feel that their privacy is being violated, and others worrying that requiring reporting cheating to superiors will cause friction amongst the student body. Others claim that with the abundance of recent statistics of high level cheating and plagiarism, a stricter honor code is a necessity. While it is important to respect the student’s privacy, and maintain an ideal learning environment, the fact remains that the honor code, as it is currently, is underperforming, and that stricter measures need to be taken, for the sake of a fairer learning environment. The main contention of the test takers seems to be that being closely watched and supervised make them feel uncomfortable and invalidated.
Properly implementing an honor code at Classical High School will reduce academic dishonesty and create an environment
Honor codes help to inspire students to have integrity. Many people were quick to criticize the idea of having an honor system due to the belief that plagiarism and cheating rates would just increase. Although that may be true in some cases, a 22-year old student on University of Virginia's Honor Committee stated "It's not like we are saying we hate you, it's just that we have standards here" (Source D) after many students were caught plagiarizing. These students were either expelled or dropped out; some even lost their diplomas. Donald L.
This article on ethics was really interesting and a dilemma that is prevalent within criminal justice. In the article Dr. Steven Davis recognized that students cheating in high school increased by 20% in the 1940 to 75% today. Davis stated, "If students lack ethics in high school and college, then there should be little surprise that they lack ethics in their careers. (2008). " This observation by Davis holds some value, because individuals that is willing to cheat to get ahead, definitely has no problem crossing ethical lines, because in their mind the wrong is acceptable, just as it was when they cheated.
When fraternities first gained traction in the 18th century, they primarily sought to promote a level of scholarly and ethical conduct. Recently, however, fraternities have carried a mixed image, stemming from the outlandish reports of “hazing, alcohol abuse, and anti-intellectualism.” In an attempt to decriminalize the current state of fraternities, universities have contrasted this with their high graduation rate, widespread community service, and the member’s willingness to
The Oral Roberts Honor Code can be summarized as a set of rules that we as Christians should follow strictly. It tells us what is right and what is wrong in a Christian standpoint. The purpose of the honor code is for us students to sign off on a set of rules, and as a Christian or as a human being when you sign a document you must stay true to your word and follow what is on that document. It also sets a standard that ORU students need to act out, therefore setting us apart, putting ourselves on a different level than public universities.
In the book Old School by Tobias Wolff, the unnamed narrator struggles through healthy imitation and plagiarism inside of the Hill school. While attending this school, the narrator enters a writing contest. The submission the narrator uses is of another person, but he claims the writing to be so related to him and how the writing is his life in a sense. The narrator ends up plagiarizing the piece and is expelled by the school. The school expelled him with thought of reputation and to set an example for the other students.
In 1987, a man named Michael Josephson who had been teaching law for twenty years and was the CEO of a legal education company, decided to sell his business and create a non-profit agency in honor of his parents. The agency is called the Joseph and Edna Josephson Institute of Ethics. He runs this collecting no salary for his contributions. In 1992, he developed an extensive study for measuring values, attitudes, and conduct of high school students. The study is called; Character Counts, more than 23,000 students throughout the United States participate and it consists of 63 questions, characterized into the following groups of questions; What do you think, Values and priorities, Have you done these things, and Feelings about school.
Instances where fellow colleagues overlook incidents of misconduct or corruption, rationalize the use of excessive force, falsify reports or even suppress evidence as they feel compelled not to “rat” (or tell tales) on their associates are examples of officers maintaining the blue code of silence. (Nwugwo, Boniface C., March 2001; Barry Daniel Patrick, 1999) An officer acting outside the acceptable group customs faces the possible jeopardy of being nicknamed a “problem child”. Much research has indicated substantially that, not surprisingly, the proverbial police code of silence does not just exist but actually pervades all levels of the fraternity, is perpetrated even by higher administrators in the system and often expects police officers to turn a blind eye to witnessed misconduct by their fellow officers. (Barry, D P
Bytheville Elementary School was caught between a rock and a hard place. Having passing test scores versus monetary gain was a constant battle. The pressure from administrator Mr. Rodriquez and not letting her team down was a major concern with Ms. Tatum. “Managers routinely delegate unethical behaviors to others and not always consciously.” (HB62)
Introduction Academic Integrity is an essential component of third level education because it is the fundamental building block in which we derive our professional ethics and integrity from. It sets a pattern for life long integrity in all areas of life. Our job as students is to construct knowledge honestly and fairly. A culture of honesty earns a great deal of respect. Integrity is fundamental to everything we do in college, I don’t think we can have genuine learning without integrity.