Thompson
The applicant requests an upgrade of his general under honorable conditions discharge to honorable conditions. The applicant states, in effect, he took full responsibility for his actions, he only asking for an upgrade because the main reason he joined was to obtain the educational benefits.The applicant states, in effect, he only had a year of service remaining on his contract and this was his only offense,he was punishment like any other Soldier, reduction to E-2, 30 days extra duty, and 60 probation, and before he finish serving is punishment. The applicant contends he was informed, that they were proceeding ahead and recommended him for separation. The applicant stats, in effectthat since his discharge,things are not going well, and he really need the opportunity to better himself.
Dusch-smith
The applicant requests an upgrade of his general under honorable conditions discharge to honorable conditions. The applicant states, in effect, he is going school full time, found a job that provides for his family, and is pursuing a career in the field of Geospatial Engineering. The applicant contends he enjoyed the job he chose in the Army and he made some off duty mistakes that he
…show more content…
The applicant states, in effect, his under other than honorable conditions discharge is obstructing his everyday life, interferes with his rights of persuading better Job opportunities, and access to his veterans benefits. In addition, the applicant requests the following narrative corrections to his DD Form 214, dated 19 February 2013; block 7a, Place of Entry into Active Duty to read “Clayton, Alabama”, block 13, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized to read “Iraq Campaign Medal with four campaign stars (5th Award)”, and, block 18, Remarks to read “continuous honorable active service:
Grievance Summary: Inmate Zubko, You are grieving that an officer did not pick up your inmate request form for a legal call. You also state that your hour out hasn’t fallen between the hours of 0800 and 1700 hours, so you can’t contact your legal counsel or the Russian consulate. Your resolution is to receive a legal call and to speak to a Lieutenant about this matter. Response: Mr. Zubko, there has been several days from the beginning of November to the 16th that you have had dayroom access during the hours of 0800 to 1700 hours. The Dates are 11/3, 11/7, 11/8, 11/11, and 11/15.
/1/2016 (SFC Raymond Harris): SGT Heather Saturday Tax Preparer NCO with USAREUR HHBN HSC Company email OIG HOTLINE requesting for assistance. SGT Saturday stated she has a serious issue to dicuss and needed guidance on re-enlistment. SGT Saturday tried to re-enlist and commander denied her re-enlistment and needed advice on her situation. 3/1/2016 (SFC Raymond Harris): Email SGT Saturday to acknowledge that OIG received her email and to contact OIG.
(U) HQDA EXORD 10-13 in support of the HQDA FY 13-15 Active Component Manning Guidance. (U) (ATSG-NCOA). The purpose of this executive summary (EXSUM) is to identify the strategic intentions within ALARACT 293/2012; DTG: P 181732Z. Currently, as well as in the future, the Army will be reducing the force structure in order to eliminate the wartime allowance. This force drawdown will diminish manning flexibility and reduce Active Duty for Operational Support (ADOS) personnel. The mission within the ALARACT focuses on providing the Army Active Component (AC) with Manning Guidance (MG) for FY13-15 that is synchronized with the Army’s priorities.
We appreciate you taking an interest in Tom Geers, and are thankful that you are willing to work with us to try to help him. We request that his case be re-opened. We want his present Florida consecutive sentence CHANGED to a concurrent sentence with his present Federal sentence. We believe Tom’s sentence is extreme.
I am writing this to explain the circumstances that resulted in the recent moves, and the frequency of those moves, of me and my family. Furthermore, I will demonstrate that those moves are abnormal to the Army and should not be used as a basis for determining future moves. In 2004, the Army instituted the Force Stabilization Initiative in order to increase readiness and stability for the fighting force, and predictability for their families. This initiative outlined stability for first term Soldiers at approximately six years and second or third term Soldiers at approximately three years.
This book was written as a way for veterans to benefit from the knowledge the author gained from his own experiences dealing with the VA. The book includes clear instructions about how to fill out the claim forms and what type of supporting documentation to attach. Screenshots of website pages are used to accompany many of the explanations. It is also discussed what to
As you can see from the objection letter, I need you to describe everything opposite, diminish its harshness and give the DA nothing to onslaught me as they have done prior—attack that objection letter Counsel, please! ***I remember I did gave a statement that says I participated in the burglaries, but that was the cops sweet talked me with cigarettes and phone calls after a 4 hours ride (Cairo, Illinois to Cook & Kankakee Counties). I was naïve and thoughts that if I give what they want to hear, they would drop the charges. Needless to say, I DID NOT enter the residences but was only served as a lookout while Ryan & the third guy pull the heists*** The prior petition I did not know the need to include another arrest that is not in the state of Illinois.
Mostly in the joint level commander’s intent is disseminated in written format and therefore it should be clear enough to provide easily understandable
As soon as Robinson left the Army with a discharge, the same scenario arises. We see what happened when Osborne
Adapting military jargon and techinical writing into something understandable for the general public is an art. In the military, we use a lot of phrases and acronyms to describe or relay information to each other. Changing these words and explaing the acronyms to a regular civilan can be frustrating and sometimes confusing. I would keep it as simple as possible, or how some troops say “Barney Style” becase most people watched or heard of Barney the dinosaour. In the military, we have technical manuals (TM’s), Field manuals (FM’s), and regulations.
The applicant requests an upgrade of his general, under honorable conditions discharge to honorable. The applicant states, in effect, he accepted his punishment and feel he deserve more the time his in service. The applicant contends he joined the military at the age of 18, straight out of high school in order to attend college and obtain a degree. The applicant contends he served in the Army for ten years, deployed to Iraq on three occasions, and received the Army Commendation Medal for his performance of duty.
Ward did breach the duty of loyalty because the duty of loyalty is the duty to put the principal first before others and oneself. During his time working for the principal, Ward came up with a design for the new product he was creating and wanted to get it patent. Ward put himself before the principal, he wanted to make a product that would give him money and none to the principal. He created the design during the time, he worked for the principal and was going to create it after he resigned from Taser. He could have prevented a breach of duty, if he did his job and did not create his product during his time served with the principal.
What is Amicus Curiae: 1) Amicus Curiae is Latin which stands for “friend of the court”. A non-party with an interest in the outcome of a pending lawsuit who argues or presents information in support of or against one of the parties to the lawsuit. 2) An amicus curiae brief is a persuasive legal document filed by a person or entity in a case, usually while the case is on appeal, in which it is not a party but has an interest in the outcome—typically the rule of law that would be established by the court in its ruling. Amicus parties try to “help” the court reach its decision by offering facts, analysis, or perspective that the parties to the case have not. 3) One of the best explanation of an amicus as stated by Lord Salmon in the court