Budgeting and budgetary control system in health care organizations has become an important topic not only because of rapidly increasing costs within the health sector, but also budgeting and budgetary control in service production generally, and in hospital services particularly raises specific theoretical and practical problems that have to be dealt with (Fallan & Petterson, and Stemsrudhagen 2004; Nyaland 2004; Fahlevi, 2014; Jackson et al).
First, a public hospital’s main objective is ensuring quality in health care services and providing treatment to as many patients as possible so as to meet health needs of a given population. But, although providing services for increased number of patients is thought of a healthy development, it also
…show more content…
Because, a public hospital may legitimate budget deficits, and could justify the overspending by showing that the patients’ need exceeded the budget limits. Thus, to overspend budgets could possibly be interpreted as consequence of the hospital’s high activity level in order to fulfill its obligations towards its …show more content…
The former is represented with the hospital CEO and administrative staff, and the latter consists of clinicians (medical professionals such as doctors, health officers, nurses, and pharmacists). However, the management task is not completely left to the administrative staff. In addition to using their medical expertise to make the best diagnosis and treatment decisions, clinicians in hospitals are also responsible to manage their medical departments on a day to day basis. They have a delegated formal authority, and are thus integrated in the hospital management structure assuming such positions as head of a department or clinical managers. As managers they involve at varying degrees in issues affecting a hospital including strategic planning, and preparation of capital and operating budgets. Studies have shown that delegating formal authority for clinicians is vital to create a hospital that is not only responsive to the demands of patients but also one that is financially
Phase 1: Initial assessment of the situation The first phase starts when the initial activities obtain positive results and the sponsor decides to proceed. Therefore, the encouraging system is looking for data identifying with: Outline of the region as well as issue distinguishing proof and effect. Apart from this there is key players in the nearby health administration environment. Additionally, we can ask expected results to group repressive.
Relaxation of restrictions on Medicaid eligibly continued into the administration of George W. Bush which significantly expand the number of community health centers (Kaiser, n/d). The changes in the late 1990's and 2000's were good for hospital spending. Wu et al. (2014) found a rapid rise in growth of hospital spending between 2001 and 2009 which was mostly driven by higher payment. While spending increased, overall, hospitals continued to contract slightly.
Decisions facing the whole organization are made in a top-down model. Everyday decisions would be made by the individual departments or units of the hospital in accordance with policy. Conflicts are addressed within each department or unit based on policies that have been set in place by the executive board and the directors. Allocation of scarce resources when affecting the whole system would be handled by the trustees, executive board, and the directors. Each unit and department has a budget it must follow to keep resources from becoming
Discuss the ethical implications of “medical necessity” in patient care. Ethical Implications of Medical Necessity When it comes to medical necessity can often refers to the determination that is made for the insurance purposes. For example, If the patient has a condition that is chronic or terminal, the treatment could be considered medically necessary whether then the patient can afford the treatment or not. Networked doctors may face ethical dilemmas when recommending treatment or specialist referrals. When it comes to medical necessities it can be controversial, it can be the use of marijuana when there can be others that are more a moral ethical in which it can be in manage care and network providers.
Discuss the pros and cons of healthcare costs being passed on to employees from the employers. The costs in healthcare have been parasitizing to a major extent on the family budget for almost a decade. So much so that it has impacted their capacity to afford day to day necessities in life. The employees have huge debts on their credit card which makes them decrease their retirement and other savings so as to pay for the debts in healthcare (“Rising…”2015).
For this assessment, I will be reflecting on what clinical governance looks like in my workplace, with a critique of the framework used within the organization. During the reflection I will discuss what pillars and principles were found, while describing my fellow team members’ understanding of clinical governance and how it is reflected in their practice. Finding the clinical governance framework for my workplace was challenging and time consuming without computer access in place of hard copy policy and procedure manuals. I found clinical governance summerised through the manuals, ensuring compliance of the 44 accreditation standards (Australian Aged Care Quality Agency, 2014) but as Knight, Kenny and Endacott (2015) discuss, while the concept is accepted, there is a gap between theory and practice, which is visual where I work. Pillars and principles such as risk management, efficiency, effectiveness, patient centric and equity are seen throughout the policies, and to analyse more specifically, clinical governance is articulated under categories, consisting of “education and training, clinical audit, clinical effectiveness, research and development and role clarity” (Davies, Chapman & Boyd, 2015 p.45).
Physicians and Hospitals go hand in hand when it comes to the medical care of patients, and it is this relationship that allows the patients to receive the care they need and deserve. It is also this relationship that we as health care administrators need to understand. In order to fully understand this relationship we need to define the concept of the integrated physician model. We also need to explain the importance of clinical integration in the strategic planning process, and the dynamics of and controversies surrounding accountable care organizations and alternative approaches to the current health system. I will also explain the advantages and disadvantages for hospitals and physician’s models.
Role of Government in Growth and Decline of Hospitals in the United States The federal government plays several different roles in the American health care arena, including the provider of health care services, the purchaser of care, Quality regulator and sponsor of research, education and training programs for professionals. Each of these roles has both positive and negative effects on the system. This paper elaborates the role of government in growth as well as the decline of one of these arenas, Hospitals. Hospitals have transformed from primitive institutions of social welfare to consolidated systems of health services delivery.
Healthcare spending’s from 1980 [4] Health care expenditure as a share of GDP was about 11.9% [who] in Sweden in 2014. Health majority of healthcare finance is generated by taxes. About 84 % of this spending is done publicly [1]. In which county council finances about 57 %, municipalities 25 %, and central government about 2 %.
There are many levels authority in the hospital, which models status hierarchy. Doctors and nurses are ultimately the ones that all the patients
There are many stakeholders involved with health care administrations. Those stakeholders can be patients, health care physician, insurance providers, pharmaceutical manufactures, hospital organizations, community clinics and government. Each different stakeholder has their own individual vision of health care administration. This causes conflict due to the nature and differences in vision. which then can cause conflicts among each stakeholder involved.
Healthcare organizations’ goals includes provide quality, value priced, safe health care services and ultimately, improve health outcomes. In addition to this primary goal, healthcare organizations also seek financial stability, community value, ethics and employee engagement. In this context, leaders are asked to efficiently use the available resources to optimize the managerial approaches to direct their teams towards more productive environment and positive interactions with patients. Healthcare setting-unlike business setting-is a more complicated system that consists of different professional teams and departments that usually don’t share the same objectives or planning strategies due to the diversity in the services provided.
Managers and the nurses left the management to the administrators and the gap between delivering good healthcare and treating patients became ever wider with time. This is
Julian is able to recognize which patients, and which of the three divisions: gastroenterology, cardiology, and oncology is using more of a variety of resources, since some patients do require more medication, lab work, and therapeutic treatment, based on the patient’s diagnoses. The information from the third system will provide Dr. Julian the ability to recognize and distinguish that not all patients require the same amount of care, some patients due to their diagnosis require different level of nursing care, some more than others. With this third approach Dr. Julian will be able to have a more precise cost of care service given to the different patients based on their necessities. The information provided by both second and third system will provide Dr. Julian with a more efficient way to control costs. She will now able to see the differences in costs among the divisions using the second and third approach.
The increase in the health care expenditure could be controlled by Governmental limitations on the needless repetition of healthcare facilities, is an essential basis of the Certificate Of Needs. There are different arguments put forth by the opponents and proponents. The proponents of the Certificate of Needs believe that the healthcare system needs it to stop hospitals from over expansion so that these investment costs are not passed on to the healthcare consumers. However, the research has been suggestive that the Certificate Of Need has been ineffective at controlling costs. There are different aspects of the whole process of obtaining the Certificate of Needs which I found very interesting.