House Of Representative Apportionment Essay

1291 Words6 Pages
The United States has a federal system declaring that a state or province is represented according to its population. In no way is there an impartial apportion method that provides the ideal concept of one-man, one vote. The U.S. House of Representative apportionment has been a long-standing debate in our nation for centuries now. Since the beginning of democracy, there have been numerous ideas and methods to define this apportionment. Essentially, there are three main components to any US apportionment: apportionment population, house size, and apportionment method. These provisions are expressed in the US Constitution, however the ways of interpreting the accounts becomes another issue. Apportionment truly determines the power of a state in Congress, which explains the on going arguments to change the way we apportion our representatives. In order to discuss my entire empirical finding, I analyzed and interpreted quantitative and qualitative analyses of all the different apportionment methods. Individuals should be equally and fairly represented in a representative democracy. Historically, the US Constitution would not be valuable if were not for the Great Compromise. Small states like that they had equal…show more content…
If a state’s quotient is higher than its geometric mean, an additional seat is allocated. The Hill method gives a very small window of opportunity for the two rounding rules to act differently. As the quotas get larger, this window gets even smaller. This method is known for slightly favoring the small states, however compared to all the other methods, it is the most unbiased for relative differences. It does a better job at minimizing those relative differences and what proportion of those differences. This method is ranked as the median method in regards to favoring either large or small

More about House Of Representative Apportionment Essay

Open Document