In the pursuit of equality during the Civil Rights Movement, two main ideologies emerged: those of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X. These two men’s philosophies are usually viewed as complete contradictories. Both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King hold the same end goal of rights for African Americans; however, their methods for achieving that goal differ. Malcolm maintained a more violent approach whereas King deemed that the best way to achieve equality was through nonviolent and peaceful practices. Additionally, Malcolm believed in the separatism of African American and white cultures, in contrast to King’s belief in the integration of black and white cultures. As will be demonstrated in subsequent pieces of evidence, the nonviolent …show more content…
believed that African Americans would only be able to achieve equality through peaceful and nonviolent means. King was a Baptist preacher who lived by the lessons taught in his sermons, including the teaching contained in the bible to turn the other cheek. In his book Stride Toward Freedom, King declared to the oppressors of black equality that “We will match your capacity to inflict suffering with our capacity to endure suffering.” This endurance of persecution displays the importance of equal treatment for African Americans. Previously, African Americans and other minorities utilized violent methods in their struggle for equal rights and freedom. However, the nonviolent protests and endeavors employed by African Americans in the 1960s caught the attention of individuals nationwide. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s refusal to react violently showed white Americans that African Americans were not subhuman creatures prone to violence, but humans capable of intelligence and reason. African Americans were not animals capable of only slave labor, but individuals deserving of the rights promised by the Constitution of the United States to all American citizens. In addition to the aforementioned pieces of evidence, Martin Luther King believed that violence would never lead to peace, only to more violence. He was firm and justified in his affirmation that “This is the ultimate weakness of violence: It multiplies evil and violence in the universe. It doesn’t solve …show more content…
For example, Malcolm said that African Americans must learn how to own, operate, and develop businesses within their communities. They must do this “to create employment for the people of [their] community so … they won’t have to be constantly … involved in picketing and boycotting other people in other communities in order to get a job.” Malcolm believed that it would be better for African Americans to start businesses and only buy from African American businesses to become independent from whites. Additionally, Malcolm believed that his fellow African Americans were wasting their time with peaceful protests and should sunder themselves from white society. Furthermore, Malcolm believed that the best way for genuine white Americans to help blacks was to create a division between their societies. In his autobiography, The Autobiography of Malcolm X, Malcolm wrote that “Working separately, the sincere white people and sincere black people actually will be working together.” Malcolm envisioned a separate nation or state for African Americans. However, this severance of cultures would not have solved the issue of racism. Instead, racism toward blacks would have remained rampant among white Americans; meanwhile, the physical presence of African Americans would no longer be present in a white America, leaving the issue of racism unsolved. Contrarily, Martin Luther King, Jr.’s dream of integration was better for
Organized into six topical groups, the author did an excellent job in comparing and contrasting King and Malcolm’s views on subjects including integration, the American dream, means of struggle, and opposing racial philosophies that needless any improvement. An interpretive introductory essay, chronology, bibliography, document headnotes, and questions for consideration provide further pedagogical support for students. The author explains how Malcolm X came closer than any social reformer in history to embodying and articulating the totality of the African experience in America while Martin Luther King was not only the most important figure in American religious history in the 20th century, he was arguably its most brilliant
Broadly, Malcolm’s main claim is that knowledge of history is very powerful and can help improve African Americans situation. He supports this main claim with four supplementary main ideas. First, black people cannot understand their current situation and change their future without understanding the past and how they got to that point. The second supplementary idea he addressed is that black people need to broaden their scope and understand that their situation isn’t a local problem but touches nationally. He states that African Americas need to understand that they are not the minority nationally and that the era of white people ruling the world has ended.
MLK wants to protest and boycott, while Malcolm wants to go head-on and compete with the other businesses through legitimate needs. During MLK's speech, he mentions, "Along with the march as a weapon for change in our nonviolent arsenal must be listed the boycott. " It shows that Martin Luther King, Jr wants to force white businessmen to hire black men and women by not buying their goods. From Malcolm's eyes he states, "So that they won't have to constantly be involved in picketing and boycotting other people in other communities in order to get a job." Malcolm X does not want to sort things out between the two races with rash and quick-witted decisions.
" Malcom X did not like how African Americans were being treated in America, It was a problem and he realized that and knew it needed to change. In relizing this, Malcom X decided to fight for a change for African Americans in America as in paragraph 5 Malcome x stated, “I don't see an American dream I see an American nightmare" Malcolm X would not stop until change happened he did care what it took including violence, Malcolm X would never ask for a fight, but he would never back down from one in paragraph 7 Malcolm X stated “It'll be Molotov cocktails this month hand grenades
Kai Woods 1/13/22 MLK and Malcolm X Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X were two influential figures in the civil rights movement, who made names for themselves while campaigning for their rights and their people's rights. However, despite their similar goals oriented around facing discrimination, the way they tried to achieve their goals and their ideologies differed. Martin Luther King believed in non-violence and peaceful protest, staging many set-ins and walks, most notable being the March on Washington, where he delivered his famous “I Have a Dream” speech. King was also a devout Christian who incorporated his religion into his pleas for equality, which inevitably made his claims seem justifiable to the American people- King knew his audience and how to appeal, being an incredible public speaker and an activist that never stopped looking to the future. It’s not to say that King didn’t have his hardships- after all, he was a black man in the 20th century that actively disregarded what white folks said about him, and he was never silenced.
Martin Luther King Jr. is most famously known for his I Have a Dream speech. It was given in front of the Lincoln Memorial on August 28, 1963 during the March of Washington. King emphasized throughout the speech that he “had a dream…one day little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers…not be judged by the color of their skin…that all men are created equal (p.106).” The main message portrayed everybody of all races joining hands and rejoicing in the freedom everybody possesses, emitting a more tranquil environment. On the other hand, Malcolm X opposed this theoretical view of society and decreed his own views and attitudes towards Whites.
In the late 1950s and most of 1960, racism and discrimination covered most streets of America. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X played a huge role in America during this time. Both men became the face of the Civil Rights movement and greatly impacted the lives of many African Americans. As divergent as their policies were, they had the same goal; to end discrimination and racism. They spent a great amount of time spreading the message of equality across the country and helped make huge changes possible.
After all, if you were to see your community in such disarray, hardly able to provide for itself, you would want to get it to near the same standing as the other communities, the communities that are borderline thriving, right? With that in mind here is what Martin Luther King Jr had to say about the problem of economical struggles: "Operation Breadbasket have increased the income of the Negro community by more than two million dollars annually...". Whereas Malcolm X mentioned in his speech, "(W)e have to learn how to own and operate the businesses of our community and develop them into some type of industry that will enable us to create employment for the people of our community" So despite their different visions, they both suck out the same core goal:
The 1960s was a period of many uproars. Black people were fighting for their right as human beings to have the same trust and laws that any white person had. During this era, two influential figures emerged as leading voices for the African American community, those two being: Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X fought for racial equality, and their differing philosophies reflected distinct approaches to achieving their goals. During the 1960s when American ideals centered around principles of democracy and progress, Martin Luther King Jr's nonviolent resistance philosophy became widely accepted as a sensible solution for promoting social equity through integration. Martin Luther King believed in achieving racial equality through integration rather than separation.
Malcolm X gave black America a face during the situation, as he saw his people as an independent and self-sustaining community when separated from any sort of discrimination. He embraced his black culture and history, encouraging young black people to take pride in their heritage and to reject the white standards of beauty and success that had been imposed upon them. This was something that Martin Luther King never had a thought on doing. This focus on cultural and historical identity was a significant departure from the assimilationist policies of the mainstream civil rights movement. As stated in paragraph #2, Martin Luther King’s protests were being put to an end in white communities because those who did not approve of black rights utilized fear tactics to scare the protestors away from their posts.
(document c) "We will meanwhile be working among our kind, in our black communities," said Malcolm X. Malcolm X wanted to have people separate to be with their kind. But Martin Luther King wanted people to come together and join hands. Regardless of good and bad, people should be able to work
In the 1960s, African Americans organised across the nation to protest equal rights and end racial injustice. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were two of the movement's most prominent figures. The pursuit of equal rights for African Americans was their overall aim, and they used a variety of strategies and tactics to achieve this objective . In order to effect social change, Martin Luther King Jr. advocated nonviolent civil disobedience and the importance of compassion and forgiveness. In contrast, Malcolm X approached a more violent approach, endorsing self-defence and opposing the oppressive behaviour of white society in the United States.
He explains the hopes of his movement, as well as the ignorance of the people keeping racism unresolved. His speaks in depth of the lack of human rights, the fraudulent American government, and the unification of African Americans. Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X’s childhood gives insight on their approach to freedom fighting as well as their similar message of uniting Americans; with their differences in conveying their message their contrasting legacy is shown through their writings. One’s upbringing has a large effect on their future. From an early age, Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X’s life were very unalike.
MLK’s “I have a dream” speech promoted the idea of integration. He believed that the races were created equal and that blacks should be respected as American citizens. Malcolm X followed Muslim principles and believed that he would protest “by any means necessary.” He would do whatever needed in order to obtain freedom for African-Americans whether it be violence or nonviolent. Malcolm opposed integration and believed that blacks needed to fend for themselves in the fight against whites.
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two influential men who served as important figures for the Civil Rights Movement. The two men came from diverse backgrounds and had contrasting views in life about religion and African American’s stance in society. Malcolm X was born in Nebraska and had great amounts of exposure to racism. Martin Luther King was born in an educated family in Atlanta, where he experienced racism, but to a lower extreme than Malcolm X. Although they passed away long time ago, they continue to live on today in a world independent of segregation. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X used opposing principles to achieve equality for blacks; King utilized integration of both races and nonviolence as opposed to Malcolm X who separated the same races and employed non violence so as to achieve the same goal.