Many issues in 1860 led to conflict and tore our Nation apart. Some were civil rights related, some were common sense related but all led to an armed conflict and separated families, and a Nation. One of the most heated topics that led to the destruction of our Nation was slavery. The States were divided among themselves. You had many Southern States including Texas, Arkansas, and Missouri that were pro slavery. These states were rich in farm land and landowners felt slaves were a vital part of the production , running, and harvesting of their crops. There were Northern States that were very anti slavery and felt slavery of any form for any reason was immoral and took away freedoms guaranteed in the Constitution of the United States. Many of these states were becoming industrialized and included jobs in factories and shipyards for all people. There were also states known as Free Territories. These states allowed slavery if a landowner wished but also provided freedom within that state. The state was run by popular sovereignty meaning it was up to the people to decide. …show more content…
This compromise stated every thing north of a specific longitude and latitude were never allowed to become slave states. The Missouri Compromise was violated by a Senator in a free state upsetting citizens in other states. This was seen as a slap in the face of those that viewed slavery as a vital part of their way of life. Many people of the time had very deeply rooted feelings and traditions that either supported or loathed slavery. Each group was trying to force their personal beliefs on each other which helped fuel a long building rift. In an attempt to repair a fracturing nation many more laws and orders were passed by Congress and by State governments. Many of these laws were met with opposition on both
The Missouri Compromise however had effects larger than simply distributing the land. The Missouri Compromise would further prevent a larger conflict between the north, and south in the immediate future. This made both sides even more restless to fight for their respective causes. The compromise
The Missouri compromise was a bill introduced to stop the fighting between the states about slavery. Each state before the Missouri compromise was determining wither the states were a free or slave state but when the Missouri compromise was proposed it stated that every state above the 36 degree and 30 degree line were to be free. This officially separated the North from the South. The Missouri compromise along with other problems about slavery is resolved when the civil war comes around. The Missouri compromise and the Mexican American war are similar because America kept wanting to expand and the Mexican American war helped America do that.
This issue would come to a head following the election of Abraham Lincoln, who, despite not being against slavery, believed that it should not be allowed to spread into new US states. Southern states saw Lincoln’s election as an existential crisis that would stunt their growth and development
Slavery was perhaps the greatest cause of the Civil War because the Union and Confederacy did not come to an agreement, leading to more conflict between the
The Missouri Compromise was a rule that regulated slavery in the southern states. America did this to even out the Non-Slave states and the Slavery states. This compromise was made in 1820 by Henry Clay. Henry Clay was a lawyer and a politician that was very involved in the Missouri Compromise of 1820.
The most important law created for the territories was the abolition of slavery. While fugitive slave laws existed, the banning of holding slaves in these territories helped balance the power to the Union during the Civil War. Southern states originally supported the banning of slavery, as they did not want to have to compete with the Northwest in commodity crops such as
The most important cause for rising tensions in the 1850s would be the Compromise of 1850. Though it was labeled a compromise, it failed to dampen hostilities between pro- slavery and anti-slavery groups. It many cases it revealed that pro-slavery interests had more power in the government that it would appear from the number of slave states. One of the largest reasons that this issue was so divisive is that is failed to achieve either side expect result in regard to the Mexican cessation. Many years prior the Missouri compromise established a latitude line that would separate free and slave states.
Since the United States has existed, slavery has been secluded to the southern portion of the country. As time went on the northern states became increasingly progressive while southern states found more reasons to justify the treatment of African Americans. The free state party wanted whites and blacks to be free, would support the Topeka constitution since it is anti-slavery, and would support the United States of America in the Civil War. The border ruffians wanted African Americans to be enslaved by whites, would support the LeCompton constitution since it allowed slavery, and would support the Confederate States of America in the Civil War.
These were a big deal involving slavery because they either strengthened slavery or made it seem like it was going to end all together. To the South, the thought of slavery ending was a complete disaster. In Document 9: Excerpt from the Dred Scott Decision, shows how Scott saw the Missouri Compromise. He says, “(I)t is the opinion of this court that the Act of Congress (the Missouri Compromise) which prohibited a citizen from holding and owning property of this kind (slaves) in the territory of the United States north of the line therein mentioned,...” This quote from his speech says he thinks that the Missouri Compromise was a good thing because it prohibited people who own slaves to cross the North and South border with their “property” or slaves.
Missouri wanted to join the union as a slave state, but needed a way to do this that would be acceptable to the North. The government decided that Missouri could become a slave state, but only if Maine could become a free state. “At the time, the United States contained twenty-two states, evenly divided between slave and free. Admission of Missouri as a slave state would upset that balance.” http://www.history.com/topics/missouri-compromise.
Several compromises were made over the issue of slavery between the Three-Fifths Compromise in the Constitution and the Civil War. Most of these compromises were made in the hope of avoiding a civil war between the North and the South, but they just prolonged the inevitable battle. The Missouri Compromise was one of the first federal laws that focused solely on slavery, including the balance of slave and free states in the federal government. When Missouri applied for statehood in 1817, there was a balance in the Senate of 11 slave states and 11 free states. Debate broke out in Congress, owing to the fact that if Missouri was added as a free state or slave state, it would tip the balance towards that side with two more votes in the Senate.
Slavery was a big issue in the 1800s. It divided the country into an argument between having slavery or not having slavery. It also made a conflict between the north and south and they could not agree on it. Some wanted to keep it, some wanted to get rid of it. The states would argue and they could not come up with a compromise.
Slavery was one of the biggest problems between 1820 and 1860. Sometimes two states had to be added to the Union at the same time, to make things fair. The North and the South fought almost constantly over the issue of slavery, sometimes things were able to be worked out about it, but as the years passed, the problems with slavery and territory started to become too big to ignore or
The submitted request created quite a national debate. The reason it created a debate was because prior to Missouri applying for statehood the north and south were evenly divided, there were eleven free states and eleven pro-slavery states. So, in this case it meant that Missouri as a state would tip the balance and there would not be an even amount of voted in elections. In order to maintain order congress passed a set of agreements that allowed Missouri to be admitted as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Although, the compromise seemed to address every issue it was the future issues that it could not solve.
Approximately three Southern states change their approach on forced labor without compensation, African American slaves would work for an amount of cash that was, generally, given to the masters of the slaves; However, some of these African American were freed and, therefore, kept all the earnings. In the mid 1800’s southern states, slavery was progressively headed towards salary base employment which would boost the states economically. Furthermore, Northern states were already using such economic structure to boost labor in the industrial region, which led to divide the country into sectors of specialized commodities. Southern state were no longer the only major contributor of economic growth, the Northern states were in large in foreign demands for cotton in the years of 1815-1843 as industries boomed in