Whilst individuals can affect the course of history, they are more likely to become a product of events. Such a statement is true regarding Albert Speer as his work in designing rallies and the Reich Chancellery in Nazi Germany had the ability to shape history, however, his impact was significantly a result of the events he was made a part of rather than his own ambition. Therefore, Speer’s contributions combined with the projects which were given to him significantly support the notion that he was shaped by events.
Through opportunities to design influential rallies and the Reich chancellery, Speer was able to grow into a political figure, and furthermore prove he significantly shaped events. Such success was due to Speers actions as he
…show more content…
This is exemplified in the Germania project as designs of buildings, as explained by Webb were “monotonously huge” with the “ideology of the party having an impact on art” Webb illustrates. In 1937, Speer was formally placed in charge of the project and given extensive powers, with “a kind of dictatorial status.” as Joachim Fest explains. Such power in the Nazi party led to condemnation from members, illustrating that rather than being commended for architectural abilities, Speer, in the eyes of Hugh-Trevor Roper, was ‘the real criminal of Nazi Germany.’ Therefore, the projects which were handed to Speer significantly shaped his impact on history rather than his own desire exemplified in his role as Armaments Minister which drew him into the machinations of political intrigues at high levels of the NAZI party. Whilst Speer was hesitant in accepting the role, his eventual approval solidifies that he was predominantly a product of his context rather than his work, with Fest explaining it as “events taking their course.” However, once given unlimited control, Speer, quickly asserted his authority and rose in prominence in the regime; although his earlier actions did not signify a desire to do so, once given the opportunity, Speer transformed into “Hitler’s master builder,” as Paul Davies stated. Therefore, Speer’s impact on history was significantly culminated from the opportunities he was
“Without Speer, Hitler would have lacked the power to stage his fight to the finish. Although, his organizational skills was appreciated by many historians but he was critised and charged for his role in forced labor camps, where slave labour of concentration camps were used in weapon manufacturing. However, Speer denied these blames as he was not aware of the source of labour and it was the responsibility of Fritz Sauckel, the man in charge of German labour. The truth behind his involvement cannot be fully interrogated in absence of adequate proves and evidence but his contribution in the improving Germany war efforts cannot be denied which made a remarkable impact on history of all the nations involved in World War
Albert Speer: Albert Speer was born in Mannheim, Germany, on March 19, 1905. He applied to be in the Nazi party on March 31, 1931; the first time contacted Hitler was in 1933. Albert Speer was an architect and Minister of Armaments and War Production for Germany in World War II. In 1942 he was made minister for armaments and mutations which he was able to triple between the years 1942 and 1943. He took responsibility for his crimes of the Nazi Regime in the Nuremberg
“There is nothing impossible to him who will try,” said Alexander the Great, a past king of an ancient Greek kingdom. In compliance with this powerful quote, are the life stories of Ernie Feld and Werner Klemke. Upon reading the articles of which describe their experiences, one may simply perceive the relationship both men have to World War II. It is evident, however, that there is an underlying message that persists to become known. Both Ernie Feld and Werner Klemke are unarguably representations of the truth that nothing is unattainable to those who believe they can achieve the impossible.
Albert Speer contributed to his period of time through numerous different ways, these includes; his contribution to the second world war as armaments minister, contribution to the consolidation of Nazi and their power in Germany, architectural designs during the period as the architect of the Reich and significantly, being opposed to the ‘scorched earth’ policy, that was implemented by Hitler. Through these events, it is evident that Speer was not just an architect or technocrat however, a criminal of war who ‘got away with murder’. Speer was not only known as a great architecture but also, an effective organiser due to his management skills. Through Speer, the architectural work for the Nazi propaganda was changed potentially forever. This
Question: How successful was Adenauer as chacellor of FDr between 1949-1963? It’s arguable that Adenauer achieved fundamental success as Chancellor of FRG during the years of 1949-1963, particularly within the context of economic and foreign policy. The immense economic growth Germany experienced and the partial reestablishment of the German military due to successful international cooperation with other nations cannot be ignored, and it’s necessary to assess the economic and political planning by Adenauer that enabled these achievements. The 50’s and the 60’s in Germany were a time of social stability, and there was no significant revival of Nazism due to the successful reintegration of many old Nazi sympathizers into society, ensuring stabilization of democracy.
“ he drew Speer to him like no one else, he singed him out and made him great”. It seems that speers’ considerable prganising abilities were of more importance to Hitler then his architectural accomplishments. Undoubtedly, the two shared a close working relationship and there was a deep mutual respect. The surprising death of Fritz Todtled to hitler summoning speer and informing him that he was appointed replacement to minister Dr. Todt in all his posts including the armaments industry.
In studying Albert Speer, one must account for the changing nature of history through introduction of new information and evidence with each new generation of historians and scholars. In Albert Speer’s case, his interpretation originated from his penitence at the Nuremberg Trials and later developed through contradictions made by historians as evidence and information was exposed in regards to the man “who was too deep for his own good”. At the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, Speer presented a remorseful face to the world, pleading ignorance. This efficiency was rarely questioned, with many believing he increased production by 300% between 1941 and 1944. Early Speer historians endorsed this view.
When seeking to resurrect the delicate nuances of history, a historian must not only present their topic in a clear and logical fashion, they must also employ several tactics to ensure that their positions are well founded and that the evidence works in a fashion that both supports their positions while simultaneously attempting to dispel any criticism of their arguments. Understandably, this task is often difficult and riddled with hidden obstacles seemingly designed by history itself to derail the historian’s task of breathing new life into times past. One strategy employed in recent decades by historians to advance their arguments is their use of the history of the individual in terms of their influence on key historical events and society.
Throughout the course of history, important events litter the ground as such common knowledge that the true power of such events becomes masked. So many years deemed crucial to the development of mankind have been written about to the point of deterioration of the stature of the events contained within said years. The unsung heroes, however, are brushed aside as a moot point in the history of the world. 1949 carries one such tune, with events that not only altered history at that point in time, but continue to impact the world today. Harry Truman and the policies he introduced in 1949 continue to shape our social and political worlds.
Lastly, the Nuremberg trials was one of the biggest events to occur toward Albert Speer. It is because of his work with the Nazi Party and his contribution to the outcome of war, was he being held accountable for his actions. However, through devious remarks and claims that he was unaware of such actions being taken place under his authority, he was sentenced to a lighter penalty than what his fellow collages. Speer was held accountable for four crimes; including the common plan or conspiracy to accomplish… a war aggression, crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity. However, out of the four crimes, ‘war crimes’ and ‘crimes against humanity’ were the two that would have been the biggest concern for Speer.
Many people would consider history concrete and stable. History cannot be changed and it has a tendency to be perceived as completely factual. However, history is more imaginative than someone might realize. Often, historians will have to fill in missing information through the analysis of facts and evidence. Simon Schama is a strong supporter of the imaginative side of historical analysis; however, Schama devalues his own status as a historian by plainly fabricating important events leading to the murder of George Parkman.
"Do you know why most survivors of the Holocaust are vegan? It's because they know what it's like to be treated like an animal,” as said by Chuck Palahniuk, the man himself. The term Holocaust has been studied by many different sceintists for over 30 years and The holocaust was a very murderous event killing over 11 million people. The man who lead the very murderous event was Adolf Hitler. In some schools, the teachers try not to even bring up the holocaust because they try to forget about it.
Throughout our lives, all people will experience challenges and tests, and no matter the outcome, one will discover something about themselves and the world. Through this discovery, a challenge will open itself up. This is a never ending cycle in life, where both positive and negative results of the challenges in our lives will help us understand and discover. The events transpired in both The Motorcycle Diaries, an ideological autobiography about the discover of communism by Ernesto Che Guevara, and Dennis Gansel’s, The Wave (Die Welle), a German socio political film support this. Gansel’s film where history repeats itself through an experiment designed to help students understand the rise of a dictator, demonstrates this cycle between discoveries and challenges, and the positive and negative sides of both that arise.
World War II is said to be the worst conflict in human history. About fifty to eighty million people died all together. There were concentration camps run by the Germans and there were essentially two wars raging. The two wars were the war in Europe and the war in the Pacific, which was Japan against the United States. World War II went on for six years and would destroy more land and property around the world and kill more people than any other war before.
“To be a leader means to be able to move masses” (Adolf Hitler). The quote epitomizes both the Nazi party in Germany and the World State in the novel ‘Brave New World’. The Nazi’s and World state exercised propaganda to gain dictatorship and control over their people. It is not difficult for one man or society to dictate millions with the help of advanced technology and propaganda techniques. The propaganda techniques like card stacking, glittering generalities, and plain folks are used in the propaganda of the Nazi party(Adolf Hitler) and the World State .