Andrew Jackson’s view on slavery was no surprise, based on his upbringing and lifestyle. Having been a slave owner and American hero, Jackson was a man of the common folk. He believed that distinct classes of people was a very bad idea, because it would consolidate corruption and the power of the upper class. This ties into Jackson’s stance on slavery, which was a positive good that would help to raise the lower class up to a more equal position with that of the rich and powerful. And by removing free white men from having to do menial tasks that could be given to slaves, white men could get to work on advancing America and technologies. Exploitation arises when one group of people need to be above everyone else to move the country forward.
Jackson vs. Clay Andrew Jackson vs. Henry Clay: Democracy and Development in Antebellum America is a book written by Harry L. Watson. Harry L. Watson writes the different stances of the presidential race in the Antebellum Era in America. He is very unbiased in his writing, clearly stating each presidential candidate. Andrew Jackson’s beliefs are clearly democratic, meaning he believed that a growing wealth and power in the business community may erode the equality of ordinary citizens. This party was also known as the ‘Jackson Party’.
In 1829, Andrew Jackson was elected to office as a Democratic Republican. He won his support from his “rag to riches” background. He rose to fame through his success in the War of 1812 through the Battle of New Orleans and the Battle of Horseshoe Bend. Jackson became the definition of what a man of modest beginnings could become. During his presidency, Jackson created a new ideology of the government, enhance the powers of the President, and protected rights for the people.
Jackson was known to be a man of the people, but he messed up his relationship with the people when he denied the bill. Supposedly, the bill put the common people at a disadvantage and the higher class at a benefit. Jackson claims that the wealthy control the bank, and he did not like that at all. For example, he says that too often the “rich and powerful” bend the acts of government to what they want, and they don’t think about other people. I personally think that is a little hypocritical because Jackson made his own decisions without others approving at all, and now he is turning around saying the rich and powerful are twisting the rules of the government.
Every President has their own opinion on slavery. For example, James Madison owned over 100 slaves between the years 1809-1817. His father was a tobacco planter who grew up on a plantation in Orange County, Virginia, which he had inherited upon reaching adulthood. Madison believed that slavery harmed both slave and slaveholder. It violated the natural rights of the people, undermining the slaveholder's moral integrity and instilling in him a contempt for honest labor.
Within the United States, Presidents are able to shape the county into whatever way they want when still following the rules, but that is not the case for Andrew Jackson. Known also as “old hickory”, Jackson has caused many events that had shaped our country in both positive and negative ways. Andrew Jackson was in fact a democrat and served as president from 1829 - 1837. At one point in his childhood, he was a orphan and had no immediate family alive. After this experience, he accepted an offer to serve as a public prosecutor.
But,Even though Andrew Jackson has sleeves and we think that’s a really big deal now, the fact that every white man in America honestly if they were rich didn't really matter. In the article Andrew Jackson Life in Presidency it tells us that Andrew Jackson pushed for the Indian Removal act. Even though he was a big pusher for the Indian Removal Act and it passed, it cleared up the American land for crops and new areas to make improvements in the land. This connects the qualities that someone should have in the US by being able to use the power that you were given and being able to be powerful and
Andrew Jackson deemed himself a defender of the U.S Constitution. In his mind he believed that with every step he took, the decisions he made were for the people and their freedom. For example, he removed the bank of the U.S when it came up for rechartment during the month of July in 1832. He saw the bank as a “monopoly of the foreign and domestic exchange” and believed the wealthy were using it to make themselves richer (Document B).
Andrew Jackson/Augmentative speech Hello, I am Andrew Jackson the 7th president of the U.S.A. I have 10 children, some of the names are Daniel Smith Donelson, and Andrew Jackson Donelson. I believe that slavery is beneficial for these three reasons. These three reasons are first slaves don’t have to be paid money. The second reason is that can be use to gather up the crops with their hands, instead of the new machines .
According to Thomas P. Abernethy, Jackson was “a frontier nabob who took sides against the democratic movement in his own state…an opportunist for whom democracy was good talk with which to win the favor of the people and thereby accomplish ulterior objectives.” Different views of Jackson continued the debate about who he really was as a leader. It was not until historian Arthur Schlesinger, took a different look at the study of Jackson. He believed that Jackson’s presidency was designed to suppress the power of capitalists, and try to help those of the lower classes. Other historians continued to disagree with Schlesinger, while others supported his idea or enhanced it, saying Jackson was almost similar to a Marxist.
How Democratic Was Andrew Jackson? Jackson was born in the year 1767 to a poor family. When he was only 13 years old he was captured from the British during the revolutionary war. As he got older he found himself in the military and he was called a national hero when he fought in the battle of 1812. He served for two terms as president and Jacksonian or is followers say that he was democratic where the people are heard.
Andrew Jackson during his time was considered a very patriotic politician he hated the rich, he hated the Indian, and loved the idea of slavery. It has been said that he grew up not educated and had a bad up bring but still managed to get to a high political suture. Jackson at one point was general and had a very decorated portfolio, which made sense he would become president, Andrew was most well know for “The Battle of New Orleans” where Andrew Jackson, prevented the British Army and General Edward Pakenham, from seizing New Orleans nearing the end of that war.
Jackson was obviously pro-slavery considering he owned about 150 slaves. A lot of people believe that this was not really a bad thing considering the times he lived in but in reality, it does not matter. The fact is this man owned many people as if they were his property, knowing they were living breathing human beings like him, is horrendous. Slavery existed to show off wealth and keep wealth in expense of African-American ’s freedom.
The time has come to make a judgement of the great Andrew Jackson, the 7th president of the United States from 1829~1837. Although some people didn’t like Jackson very well due to very few of his decisions, he made many good decisions during his presidency. Andrew Jackson should be remembered as a hero of the common man due to his unifying leadership, generous approach of governing, and concern for economic equality. The first reason that Andrew Jackson should be remembered as a hero is because of his unifying leadership.
However, Jackson did fail to defend the individual liberty of minorities like African Americans and Native Americans, in fact their rights were taken away. President Jackson defended the equality of economic opportunity. For instance, Jackson vetoed the bill for the recharter of the Bank of the United States in Doc 2. Jackson’s point of view of the bank was that it’s unconstitutional and it only benefits the Whig elites. His purpose was to veto the bill for the bank to save the common good.
He also did not actively promote equality of economic opportunity and instead helped the western elites grow wealthier. Andrew Jackson claimed to be a guardian of the constitution. Jackson and his followers believed in a fixed constitution, which means that it will not change. When Andrew Jackson vetoed the Bank of The United States, he could have claimed that since he believed in a fixed constitution and this “bank monopoly’ was not included in the constitution it should not be allowed. Instead, he vetoed it on the grounds that he did not like it because it was helpful to the eastern elites which seemed inconsistent.