How Did Athens Gain Power In Athenian Society

This essay will focus on the differences and their significance of political standing and govern in Ancient Athens and Sparta. It will bring up similarities and differences in social status and consequently in gaining and holding public and political status as well as depict the respective governing style of Athens and Sparta in comparison. Thought both poleis were a great city, and albeit having many similarities there were as many differences within many places of their society, which would eventually add to their quarrel with each other. In both city-states, the only way to any form of status within the society was through being native-born.

The word democracy is derived from the Greek word dēmokratia: dêmos meaning people and krátos meaning power or rule; democracy is a form of government, which places power in the hands of the people. Many societies identify themselves as “democracies” and this frequently leads to an allocations of equalitarianism, liberalness, or freedom. The connotations and implications that accompany the word democracy are abundant. Societies in which citizens have the right to vote for representatives are attributed with the classification of “democracy.” Additionally, countries in which citizens are obliged to vote directly on the legislation of their state are referred to as democracies.

In Ancient Greece, Sparta, had laws that when you were born you were to be examined for any defects. If you had any you were to be thrown down in a valley to die, and if you were the first born male of your family you were put in a military camp to be trained for further uses. This took away their human rights on living free if you are a man, and if you are a woman you were to stay in the town and be a “house-wife.” The Spartan government wanted to make the city a stronger unit by taking away job choices. The Spartan government was a great government because, they trained young boys to be warriors, their population couldn’t have any flaws, and the people didn’t have a choice in job.

Women’s roles has changed dramatically throughout history. By looking at the lives of women, it would be possible to tell how the civilians at that specific period of time were living. In this paper, women’s lives in mainly three civilizations would be discussed, the Sparta, the Athens, and the Hellenistic era. In Sparta, women were needed to live at home, while their husbands remained in military barracks until the age thirty.

Was ancient Athens truly democratic? Democracy is a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state. I do not believe that in the 4th to 5th century BCE ancient Athen were democratic for many reasons.

In Ancient Greece,four reformers changed they way Athens lived their daily lives. Their names were Draco, Solon, Peisistratus, and Cleisthenes. The reformer that believed to have put the most positive impact onto the Athenian government is Peisistratus, the mentee of Solon. Peisistratus was known as the champion of the poor for all he did and the new reforms and laws Peisistratus added on to their government. He gave the poor jobs so they had a way to make some money for them to provide for themselves and reduce taxation, which have helped a lot for most.

We are humans. Civilized humans to be more specific. But we were not always so civilized. From the beginning of times, men kind have developed incredibly a lot. We evolved from cavemen, and went through so many phases to be who we are right now.

History 1421 Week One Written Assignment University of the people Abstract This week, as a prompt for our written assignment we were given five questions relating to the text provided as week one’s reading material, “Athens & Sparta: Democracy vs. Dictatorship” by Dr. Peter J. Brand; how did people in Athens and Sparta obtain the right to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community, who held public office, what rules governed the selection of public office holders, how were the two city-states similar in their governmental structures, and how did they differ.

Analysis The following analysis questions the democratic notions of the ancient citizenship Athens and eventually attempts to clarify the development of democracy and its significant influence in Europe in respect to equality. Ancient Greek founded the democracy in Europe regarding the ideas of freedom and liberty. It is notwithstanding questionable how this civilization originated such notions without considering the relevance of equality: in ancient Athens, likewise in other citizenships around ancient Greece like Sparta, a male dominance is observable; only men at the age of eighteen are considered as part of the citizenship while foreigners, slaves and eventually, women are intentionally segregated from the community.

Athens and Sparta were city-states of great dominance and success during ancient Greece times. The Athenians controlled the southeast area of the Attic Peninsula, and farmed the surrounding dry rocky soil that developed from the rough terrain and the low number of rivers. This small piece of land could only support a small population and was surrounded by mountains, cutting off most of the interaction between the city states of Greece. The isolation caused a fierce independence to grow; it was based on their own beliefs and government system rather than a united empire with one unified religion and government. The rough terrain separated the city-states and from this the city-state Sparta created their own independence different from Athens.

The stability of the Roman Republic and the Athenian Democracy is similar because they both had internal problems based on low income, yet the systems are different because participation in Rome was related to wealth, while participation in Athens wasn’t. To start, the stability of the Roman Republic and the Athenian Democracy was similar because they both had internal fights and reforms due to wealth. Specifically, the Gracchi brothers were a large part of the populares political group in Rome because of their efforts to redistribute land, set limits to the amount of land one can own, and make the state pay for military equipment, instead of the soldiers themselves. This represents how the Roman Republic had several problems regarding an unbalance in wealth. These were recognized by the Gracchi brothers, which led to such reforms.