How Did Burk Interpreting The French Revolution

1148 Words5 Pages
Revisionists were critics to the Marxist ideals and had a slightly different take on the events of the French Revolution, which they believed to have nothing to do with a bourgeois revolution. The revisionist countered the Marxist stating that class struggle had little to do with the breakout of the war and nothing to do with expanding capitalism. Cobban Taylor had been a revisionist theorist whose views were highly securitized by the French Marxist historians. They attempted to downplay the severity of the French Revolution and denying the events their rightful place in modern history. However, two French historians after reviewing their Marxist counterparts had come up with their own interpretation and standpoint on the uprisings. Francois Furet was a 20th-century historian who most famously wrote Interpreting the French Revolution in 1981. Most of his research consisted of accounts gathered from both Anglo-Saxon and French writings and drew on 19th-century historian Alexis de Tocqueville works to help develop a view about the progressiveness of the revolution.…show more content…
As far as Burk was concerned, the French Revolution turned into a disruptive, radical revolt that leads to a disastrous break from what could have been a slow fruitful endeavor. His attitude towards the revolution viewed the changes in France as radical and too ambitious for the revolutionaries. The changes the opposition's wanted to ensue, would have been too much to keep sustained and this would have allowed policies to be enacted that would have been otherwise better kept suppressed. In Burkes view the revolution came up too quickly, causing the revolutionaries appear disorganized and lacking leadership. His argument was that French Revolution was not based on any rational principle and to some extent their struggle would lead them to
Open Document