The french and Indian war alter the political and ideological relations between Great Britain and the american colonies in many different ways. The war enable Britain to be more involved with colonial political and economic affairs. After the war Britain also ended their policy of salutary neglect. After a while their plan to make money of the colonies soon lead to the revolutionary war because it increased tension and outrage among the american colonies.
In return, the French gave Britain the eastern part of Louisiana as a part of the Treaty of 1763, which ended the French and Indian War.
Short-Answer Questions As a result of the Seven Years’ War, Britain viewed the colonies as selfish and lazy; some colonies refused to contribute to the war effort and the militia was poorly trained. Most British were convinced that the colonists were unable to provide for their own defense and, as a result, they began to strengthen their control over the colonies. Britain believed they had to institute more forceful and controlling policies. The colonists were proud of their performance in the war. The colonists began to believe that they could provide for their own defense and the war promoted a sense of unity throughout the colonies.
(Doc A). By doubling the size of British territories within the New World, the Treaty of Paris forced Britain to place more soldiers into the Americas, therefore creating further spending to be imposed on colonists. This, along with the large amount of debt generated by the Seven Years War posed a great economical loss to the British, which they then pushed onto their colonies. This taxation caused increased aggression on the part of the colonies, further pushing the British and the colonies apart. However, the colonists did not wish to pay taxes for a war that was fought for their own defence.
The French and Indian War altered the relations of the American Colonies and Britain through political, economic, and geographical issues. At the start of the French and Indian War the French owned a big majority of land but the during the war the French lost their land to the English. The Treaty of Paris in 1763 gave the English, the French land of North America (Doc A).
At this time they owned and protected Louisiana. Which is why they asked Louisiana to gather intel. France soon found that Britain was trying to find a way to trade with the American Indians by the Ohio River Valley. According to (Ohiocentral.org) both countries owned part of the river. The French claimed it was
Britain gained their title of being the most powerful force in the world after winning battle after battle in the past century; besides their victorious history, Britain also had other advantages going into the war, and because of this, they were the favored side to win the Revolutionary War. Their success was contributed by the authority that the British government had on their people, this authority caused an almost limitless amount of resources. The Parliament could obtain or raise any amount of funding needed to support their military and cover the costs of any other needs that would have had to have been met during this time, such as ships. This type of funding and vast resources readily available were not common in America as colonists
After the Treaty of Paris in 1763, which ended the Seven Years War between the French and the British as well as all of their allies, the French lost claim to all of their land. The English being the winners of the war claimed the majority, and what they did not seize was given to the Spanish for their support and help in the war. In 1802 France and Spain signed a secret treaty called The Treaty Of Ildefonso. Once the treaty was fulfilled, Spain gave the Louisiana territory back to France (“Background”). Napoleon had interest in Louisiana for the purpose mainly to ship supplies to the French colonies in the Caribbean islands but also as a source of food and trade.
In 1754, conflict between Britain and France over the Ohio River Valley resulted in the French and Indian War, which ended in a British victory in 1763. Although the French and Indian war resulted in a joined victory of the British empire, the conflict marked a turning point in America’s relations with Great Britain to a large extent, due to a change in the British attitude of salutary neglect, imperial control, as well as American identity. The change in the British attitude of salutary neglect, enforced sudden regulations on colonial trade, eventually resulting in a changed American perspective, as Americans felt threatened and suspicious of the British. After the French and Indian War, several British soldiers remained in the colonies,
The war was a turning point of French forces in North America, which confirmed British controlled the half eastern part of North America. The French and Indian war was the favorable to Britain, which balance the power of occupied lands in North America.
The French and Indian War, or the Seven Years War, began in 1754, as a result of conflict over territory and trade in North America. As both countries conquered the new land, letting their civilians settle there as colonists with the sole purpose of providing money for their homeland, they encountered the Ohio Valley; land that was assured to contribute to each of their imperialist motives. During the war where French troops allied with the native Americans against Britain, the laws given to the British colonies were left unmonitored, and the colonists evaded the strict taxation and rules against trading with other countries. However, when the war ended in 1763, resulting in a British victory, Britain was left a multitude of problems. This included the great national debt of approximately 122 million British pounds.
To win the war, the Americans required, above all else, supplies. This was evident especially during the harsh winter in which the nearly 2,500 of Washington’s troops had perished from cold, hunger, and disease at Valley Forge. Such an event may have been avoided if they had adequate food, clothing, and shelter rather than the rotten food and clothing which troops had continuously been provided. However, once the French began offering aid in covert, the army’s luck had finally improved. Although the French did not supply troops directly in the earlier years, the Americans still reaped the benefits with adequate amounts of ammunition as well as weaponry.
The Dutch grabbed rich territories in Asia to gain control over the profitable spice trade. They also set up colonies in South Africa and North America. The French acquired colonies too, including present day Canada, which was particularly valuable for it’s fur. The British in the 1600’s took over the Dutch territory in North America and in 1763 they took Canada from the French. Despite their loss of the 13 American colonies after the Revolutionary War in 1783, the British continued to acquire new territories.
‘”The Champions of the Game,” British “imperialist” were unquestionably the shrewdness of them all. . Their military more advanced and powerful than others: their technology advanced, and they were astute. When ‘colonizing” a word play for taking over the populations they “found,” and claiming them as a part of the British empie. with imperialistic methods. Not just any country could be colonized formerly or informally” they must have something the British wanted to seize, riches, resources or strategically placed lands or ports at sea. .
Although it is inaccurate to limit the governance system of British imperialism throughout the 19th and 20th century as indirect, it is relevant to underline that the British majoritarly pursued indirect colonialism especially in Africa. Indeed, after centuries of settler and direct colonialism, British imperialism soon came to realize the advantage of an indirect type of rule in their newest colonies when considering the economic benefits but also the pre-colonial societies of Africa. Indeed, most of these African states were characterized by complex and highly populated pre-colonial areas and this discouraged many British settlers and more importantly perhaps, discouraged British institutional establishments in those countries. This led