Greece and Rome is a very heated decision in which one had more of an impact on the mediterranean area. Both places greatly affected it. When it comes down to it, I think Rome affected it greater, even if it has its flaws. There are also reasons that greece affected it, but I think Rome affected it greater.
Rome was at one time the greatest empire in the world. They were in great times because they had Julius Caesar, who was an awesome ruler. They had a great water system that could support everyone. But what controlled the mediterranean was their army. They could march distances up to 40km a day and that was due to the extreme conditioning they had to do. They also had a very big army because romans lived about 100% longer than everyone else in western europe. The way they expanded their army was by destroying other army’s. Their biggest rival, Carthage, they beat them every time they were in a war. Even what Hannibal came through the alps (which nobody thought they could do) they held their ground and defeated them. Everyone was happy while the army was fighting because they used
…show more content…
Sparta’s army could be stopped when the Battle of 300 came around where sparta lost its soldiers. Olives were the only thing that greece used to trade because their land was not suited for agriculture. Only 1 in 10 acres of land was available for farming. This shows that olives were the only thing sustaining them for trade. Even though they beat the persian army in the persian war, that led to bad things. Since Athens navy was getting all the recognition for the win, Athens got lots of money from other greek city-states to protect them. This sparked a flare in other city-states like sparta. That all created the Peloponnesian war and Athens downfall. It 's hard to believe, but winning the persian war really made one of greece’s biggest city-states have a giant downfall. Everything good that greece did turned out bad in the
Although Pericles’ words strived to inspire and encourage the Athenian people to fight valiantly against Sparta and its allies, they are not enough to embolden the Athenian people onto victory in the Peloponnesian War. His words do motivate Athenians to make tremendous effort in extending their power and defeating Sparta and its allies, but in the end, may have lead to Athenians’ demise. Fostering pride and determination throughout the war, Athens makes several attempts to expand its naval power, but fails in its plan to overtake Syracuse on the coast of Sicily, weakening its efforts against Sparta and its allied city-states. Finally, in the naval battle at Aegospotami, the Spartans have a decisive victory over Athens, and the Athenians eventually surrender, ending the Peloponnesian War.
Rome 's success was basically due to skillful diplomacy and to its loyal, well-trained army. Another way they were successful is by the build up of their army. Those who were defeated were recruited. Those
The Greek political and social landscape was significantly impacted by the Greco-Persian War, which took place between the Persian Empire and the Greek city-states from 492-449 BC. Even though the Greeks won the war, it left behind a legacy of deeper internal tensions in Greece which in my opinion is the most significant result (Britannica, 2023). This was due, in part, to the fact that numerous Greek city-states had to cooperate against a common foe throughout the conflict. After the threat was removed, though, they reverted to their independent behavior and picked up their internal disputes again. Political unrest and frequent clashes between several city-states resulted from this.
The Greeks were fighting on their own land. Fighting for their home. This made the war mean a tremendous amount more to the Greeks than it did to the Persians. Many of the Persian soldiers had been forced to fight at Marathons while the Greeks were ready to die to defend their homeland. On the other hand, One of the major disadvantages for the Greeks during the Battle of Marathon was that the Spartans were not around to fight the battle.
Who was the better Greek city-state? Athens or Sparta? A question asked for quite some time now, probably since they existed. It’s time we get an answer! If you ask me, I think it was Athens that was the better Greek city state.
The Greeks lived in little city-states, each one like a small town in the United States today, with no more than about 100,000 people in each city-state. These city-states -Athens, Sparta, Corinth, Thebes - were always fighting each other over their borders. Often they would get together in leagues, a lot of city-states together, to fight as allies. Sometimes other people invaded Greece, and then there would be wars to defend the city-states from the invaders. Sometimes the city-states fought together, and sometimes they didn't.
This caused many issues, with many allies attempting and failing to leave the league. Thucydides states that they had “deprived [their allies] of their ships, and imposed instead contributions in money.” (1.19) Greece was now divided between two major powers: the Dealian League which formed the Athenian empire and Sparta and the Peloponnesian allies. Up until this point, Sparta had maintained its hegemony and authority as the major power or empire of Greece. Naturally, the rapid expansion and power of the Athenian empire was a concerning threat and looming anxiety to their authority.
Citizenship in Athens & Rome: Which Was a Better System? The Romans left a powerful legacy that impacts our modern-day society. It was founded in 753 BC around the center of the Italian peninsula. They took up 15% of the world’s population by conquering territories in western Asia, southern Europe, and northern Africa.
The Roman empire was one of the most powerful or the most powerful empire in ancient times. A portion of this can be credited to its location in an area with good geography and climate. However, once the empire was vast enough its geography varied quite a bit. It went from the moderate climate of northern Italy too much warmer climates in northern Africa. In Italy, the central part of the empire, stood the city of Rome.
According to Morey (1901), Carthage was a wealthier nation with brilliant leaders, rich in commercial resources. It had a more powerful navy and they showed their greatness in their successes. On the other hand, Rome was better organized and had a more efficient army. It depended on the well-organized political system and the character of its people.
At the end of the war, Sparta forced Athens to surrender. The long war weakened Greece so much that King Philip II of Macedon conquered it in 338
The Romans and Carthaginians became rivals as they expanded looking for other lands to conquer for resources, especially on the western Mediterranean. Carthage strengths were in its wealth from trading, commercial resources and her brilliant leaders. Rome was much better organized and had steadfast, loyal citizens. The Romans had a more efficient army and political system as well.
Greece and Rome, two ancient societies, both influenced many aspects of modern life. Their advancements were utilized in many later cultures. They influenced almost every part of today’s world, such as government, language, and architecture, as well as making scientific advancements. Also, the successes of these two civilizations lead to many countries modeling most of their public facilities and systems after the ones found in Greece and Rome. Ancient culture strongly influenced modern culture by means of language.
Ancient Rome left tremendous legacies such as technological advancements, religious beliefs and governmental structures that shaped the world today. The Romans conquered many territories and took on their cultures as well, in particular the Ancient Greek culture. Ancient Greek civilizations played a major role in the history and development of the Ancient Rome civilization. The Ancient Greeks influenced the social structure, religion and military strength of Ancient Rome.
Basically, it’s imperative to point out the fact that the roots of Western civilization can be traced back to Mediterranean classical ancient times, as well as other parts of European predominantly occupied by the Greek. In this regard, the geography of Greece played an important role in the development of the Greek Civilization, for instance, “HIST 101 Western Civilization I.” (n.d) states, “Greece is an extremely mountainous, peninsula almost completely surrounded by water. It includes both a mainland and some 1400 outlying islands in the Mediterranean Sea.”