How Did John Adams Separate The Supreme Court

In the Election of 1800, Democratic-Republican Party founders Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr won against the candidates of the Federalist party John Adams and Charles C. Pinckney. This event marked the first time that one party had replaced by another. Thomas Jefferson had a different style with political ideas, he wanted to reduce the power of government that rights should belong to the people and mostly the government, also to promote an agrarian economy where plantations are focused. Despite of the influence of Anti federalists power under Congress, John Adams attempt to separate the Supreme and Circuit courts and to appoint Federalist supporters into the newly created court positions in the last 19 days of his presidency. By the time

Madison was a landmark case in the U.S. Supreme court history. President John Adams filled the Supreme court with 16 new judgeships before he left office. On the other hand, some of the appointments were made too late, the letters were not delivered by the time Adams left. Advised by Jefferson, James Madison the Secretary of State, refused to deliver William Marbury’s letter, which was appointed by president Adams as Justice of Peace. John Marshall, Chief Justice also appointed by John Adams argued that the Constitution did not authorize the Supreme Court to take such cases directly. Accordingly, Judicial Review was born, it is the power of the courts to review laws, treaties, policies or executive orders relevant to cases before the court and overturn those that are found unconstitutional. However, some people thought the judicial review gives the Judicial branch unlimited power to do things that against the citizens since they are the las process of making laws, other court cannot overrule them. Also they have a whole life term being judge made them so independent from other branches. Due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role to make sure that each branch of government check and balance the limits of its own power. Also, Judicial review also protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the

There are no power in the system provided to correct their construction, means that if the legislature passed any laws, they have the final authority of saying it is unconstitutional. In addition to, the judges have no laws by saying them doing the wrong thing of taking citizen’s rights. In my viewpoint, the federalist paper support this argument. For example,“ The judiciary...may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgement” The legislative controls the command of the purse, and executive holds the sword of the community. Every Branch of the government should have equal responsibility of ensuring bill that passed into laws that are constitutional. However, the only thing that the Judiciary has is judgment. Alexander Hamilton recognized that the best judges would be produced by a lifetime study the things they need to do in order to faithfully execute their office. This is the reason that why the Judiciary is so independent from the other