ipl-logo

How Did John Mccutheon Violate The Treaty Of Versailles

648 Words3 Pages

In order to put an end to The Great War (later known as World War 1) president Woodrow Wilson created the Treaty of Versailles. The treaty would end the feud between Germany and the Allied powers, along with reassigning German boundaries and making them pay reparations for the war. Therefore, Germany would not participate in signing it. The most controversial part of this treaty was the League of Nations, an international organization to resolve the foreign disputes. United States senators fear that it would cause America to participate in more international conflicts, causing them to be against it. In the political cartoon “Interrupting the Ceremony” by John McCutheon, a wedding ceremony between Uncle Sam, representing the United States, and “Foreign Entanglements” is being directed by a man reading from the League of Nations, trying to get America to join. The US Senate breaking through the glass, as he holds “Constitutional Rights”, represents the Senate’s disapproval for the treaty. As represented through the cartoon, McCutheon was against the ratification of the Treaty of Versailles because he did not support the League of Nations and favored the Senate and its ideas.
The marriage between Uncle Sam and “Foreign …show more content…

He displays his hatred for the League through his political cartoon “Interrupting the Ceremony”. I believe that McCutheon successfully portrayed his feelings against the Treaty of Versailles and was able to back up his feelings with strong evidence and reasoning. The idea of creating a wedding scene between America and “Foreign Entanglements” allowed for the audience to connect to the image and better understand the situation that the Senate was in. All in all, McCutheon created a political cartoon to display his feelings for being against the ratification against the Treaty of

Show More
Related

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Patrick Henry Speech

    748 Words  | 3 Pages

    At the Virginia convention in 1774, the delegates such as Patrick Henry, gather to decide their course of action, in a time where their primary goal was to rid themselves of their oppressor, Great Britain. Patrick Henry addresses the other delegates and discloses his opinion on what course of action the people should take. In his speech at the Virginia Convention, Patrick Henry forcefully influences the audience to go to war with Great Britain through diction, figurative language and rhetorical devices and by confronting them with their current position of danger in the face of the inevitable British Invasion. Patrick Henry emphasizes his opinion of the necessary war by using diction such as ethos and logos, through appeals to their senses that make connections for the audience. Through Henry’s repetitive utilization of ethos

    Read More

  • Patrick Henry's Speech On Virginia Persuasion

    422 Words  | 2 Pages

    Henry’s speech was the startup of the continental army, which would protect this young nation from the tyranny of British rule. By incorporating pathos Mr. Henry was able to push the men of the convention toward voting for the army. He pulled at their desires for independence and strong feelings nationalism by introducing the idea of unity between the colonies, stating. “I am not a Virginian, but an American” (Henry). This quote drove the feeling of united colonies deeper into the listeners of the convention, bringing up strong emotions, drawing heavily on pathos.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Essay On Patrick Henry

    1644 Words  | 7 Pages

    Patrick Henry was able to persuade the delegates that war was their only ethical choice to preserve the image of their government. Patrick Henry draws a connection between submitting to the tyranny of Britain and slavery when he asks, “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?” (Henry 190). Patrick Henry is making the argument that by standing by idly the delegates are becoming slaves to the British Empire. Many of the delegates would have owned slaves, and been affected greatly by being compared to a slave.

    Read More

  • Patrick Henry Ethos Pathos Logos

    938 Words  | 4 Pages

    Patrick Henry, a rhetoric writer, who attended and spoke at the Second Virginia convention, gave the, “Give me Liberty, or Give me Death”speech. Henry develops this by pointing out that the British have surrounded them, and have no reason to, other than to imply dominance. Within that, he goes on about how fighting has already begun, and they'd be foolish to believe it wouldn't come to fighting with them as well. Henry’s purpose of the speech is to get people to come to arms in order to fight for their freedom. His audience would have been the members of the convention, whom Henry creates a relationship with, by using ethos, pathos, and logos.

    Read More

  • Woodrow Wilson's Neutrality In World War I

    1305 Words  | 6 Pages

    War is raging on all fronts. The United States is holding true to its neutrality in World War I. As the war continues, growing suspicions creep into the households of everyday American people. The pressures of Germany are a growing problem for the United States. Germany ultimately forced the U.S. to declare war on them.

    Read More

  • Treaty Of Versailles Dbq Essay

    397 Words  | 2 Pages

    Because of that point, American senators were iffy about ratifying the treaty. They saw the League of Nations as a trap. Basically America would be pulled into all kinds of wars even if they were not the ones directly attacked. If America had decided to ratify it, all of the Americans would be at risk because who is to say a nation not in the

    Read More

  • How Did President Wilson Join The League Of Nations

    140 Words  | 1 Pages

    America, namely President Wilson realized after World War I that he had to develop a pact with other countries to prevent war from ever happening again. (Shultz, 2014). He crafted the Treaty of Versailles, this included the League of Nations, however; unfortunately for the president America would not join the league. America did not join the League of Nations because of Congress. (Shultz, 2014).

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Techniques Used In Patrick Henry's Speech To The Virginia Convention

    689 Words  | 3 Pages

    He forces the audience to accept what he is saying as the truth. “We must fight!” a short exclamatory sentence which creates a sense of urgency into the audience. As the speech reaches its climax, and the excitement and energy that Henry has placed into the audience, they are now convinced and ready to charge into battle against the British. Patrick Henry’s “Speech to the Virginia Convention” was a call to arms to the colonist against the British during the 1700’s.

    Read More

  • What Are The Rhetorical Devices Used In Patrick Henry's Speech

    691 Words  | 3 Pages

    On March 23, 1775, Mr. Patrick Henry made history when he delivered a speech at the Virginia Convention. Mr. Henry's purpose in his speech was to convince the Virginia patriots attending the convention that the only option with Britain remaining was war. Mr. Henry used many rhetorical devices throughout his speech, and with the use of pathos, ethos, and logos he had an effective advantage that appealed to almost every person at the convention. To begin with, Mr. Henry’s speech contains much use of pathos as he relates to the emotions of the people of Virginia. An example of Mr. Henry's use of pathos is when he states, “I consider it as nothing less than freedom or slavery...”.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death

    1000 Words  | 4 Pages

    but he has different views than his audience, the Virginia Convention, does. Throughout the speech, Henry uses words like “we” and “ourselves” to show that he is still with the audience, and not against them. Henry continues on in that same paragraph by using pathos. When he said, "Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself guilty of treason towards my own country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings. " He is saying that this is what he needs to do for his God.

    Read More

  • Fdr's Political Cartoon Analysis

    219 Words  | 1 Pages

    This political cartoon was made in late the 1920s, during the Great Depression. The unknown author made the cartoon to show his support for President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his ability to build the economy using his reforms known as the New Deal to build the economy after the fall of the market. This cartoon uses several different strategies to try and persuade the media to also side with FDR. This includes the strategies of symbols, accuracy bias and propaganda. He puts all of FDR 's domestic programs (excluding “BANK LEGISLATION”) on the ace cards, symbolizing that the reforms he used to rebuild the economy were the best “cards” FDR could play.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Patrick Henry's Revolutionary Speech

    560 Words  | 3 Pages

    The speech’s main purpose is to persuade people to fight for their freedom. Patrick Henry’s speech is truly meant to persuade the Virginia Convention to prepare for war if the British government fails to comply to the needs of the convention. He uses an urgent and inspirational tone to deliver a thought provoking speech. This is essential to getting his point across, and that the need for assertiveness is significant. The convention was practically split in half, some wanting peace no matter what, and others who wanted immediate action toward the Britains.

    Read More

  • John Maynard Keynes The Economic Consequences Of The Peace Summary

    558 Words  | 3 Pages

    The treaty was written to end the fighting between Germany and the allied power. Even though the treaty was signed at June 28, 1919, the treaty was not processed till October 21, 1919 by the League of Nations. Even though the treaty was made to stop the fighting between Germany and the Allied power. The treaty had major flaws.

    Read More

  • The Consequences Of The Treaty Of Versailles

    791 Words  | 4 Pages

    Introduction World War I came to an end with the signing of the Treaty of Versailles on June 28, 1919. The treaty was signed to create lasting peace. The treaty was negotiated between the three allied powers of Britain, France and the United States with no participation from Germany. The treaty 's negotiations revealed a split between the three allied powers with France intending to weaken Germany in such a manner that it would make it impossible for it to renew hostilities. However, Britain and the United States objected to some of the provisions because of the fear that it would be a pretext for another war.

    Read More

  • The Causes Of The Treaty Of Versailles

    1218 Words  | 5 Pages

    “When the peace treaty is signed, the war isn’t over” (Marlantes). When the fighting stopped on the battlefront of World War I many leaders of different countries gathered together in Paris. They were there to discuss the Treaty of Versailles that would ensure permanent peace. The treaty that was created was extremely unfair to Germany. The Treaty of Versailles was far from perfect, but some of the biggest faults were forcing Germany to take the blame for the whole war, demanding they give up all of their colonies and decrease the size of their military, and paying reparations to the Allies.

    Read More

More about How Did John Mccutheon Violate The Treaty Of Versailles

Open Document