As we entered the 21st century, the presidency became very different from the one created in 1878. The constitution limited the presidency so it wouldn’t become a monarchy. However, the limitations subsided because of the attitudes of the founding fathers, and the next two presidents. Washington, Adams and Jefferson shaped the presidency into more of a positively influenced position in the 1800s. But, from that time until about the 1930s, Congress was the most dominant office in the executive branch. Over the past 80 years the power has majorly been dominate in the legislative branch. But how did this shift happen? Since the Constitution gave the President such limited power, Congress did dominate the entire executive branch until the 1930s. …show more content…
Partly because of Habeas Corpus which was an executive order created during the Civil War. Which gave them the right to arrest and jail people for suspicion of disloyalty to the Union. He also ignored Congress, which is pretty bold. He expanded the army and made blockades so the southerners couldn’t get through the border, this was all done behind congress’ back. During Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson’s terms, both worked to expand the presidency while in sync with Congress. During Wilson’s term however, World War I gave him the chance to take the lead of international affairs. And Roosevelt held the nation together through The Great Depression and World War II. He gained presidential power through The New Deal. As for the scope of the presidency advancing or not, I think it really depends on who is in office and how he interprets the role of being the President. For example, Roosevelt believed that he could influence better lives of the citizens by using his power and government to do so, aka the New Deal. But, Reagan believed that by being the president, the role was to minimize the control of the government in the regular everyday lives of citizens. That being said, the scope of the government has changed a lot since the framers first created it. The president is more like a CEO that made the executive branch the largest in terms of …show more content…
The original cabinet consisted of four members and the President: George Washington (President), Thomas Jefferson (Secretary of State), Alexander Hamilton (Secretary of Treasury), Henry Knox (Secretary of War), and Edmund Randolph (Attorney General). However, as the government changes and creates new offices, the cabinet expands because it seems more suits to help the nation grow. As we are now in the 21st century, our executive branch has 15 cabinet members. I think it is a good thing to have expanded this because it gives more time for the head of these offices to be focused on their particular issue. However, some may believe that this expansion has made the presidency more powerful or too big because of new rules and regulations. But I disagree. This is a good thing to have in our country. If we didn’t have all the cabinet members and the people beneath these members attributing, none of the new ideas would succeed and help the public grow. The purpose of the constitution is to put a system in place to keep citizens happy and civil. By adding the members to the cabinet it has only been to benefit our country. I believe they wouldn’t have expanded the size, unless they truly needed
Unprecedented powers, cabinet vocations, and bureaucratic government positions are added with every new administration. Established in Article II, Section 2 of the US Constitution, the Cabinet began as a four-man position; now 15 distinct cabinet members are approved by Congress
So what legal or perceived authority did Lincoln act on? When the South attacked Fort Sumter in April 186, Lincoln almost immediately started his quest to circumvent the Constitution. He would justify his actions not on law, rather his interpretation of judicial review. However, his decisions stretched the meaning of the Constitution and violated many sections of the document. Lincoln amplified Constitutional lines by raising money for troops without the approval of the U.S. Treasury, suspending that writ of habeas corpus and the issuance of his Emancipation Proclamation. The President openly admitted that his original proclamation held no true legal authority; it was issued as a measure of war and not a true attempt at emancipation.
As our nation first formed, there was much concern about the role of our nation’s leader and how powerful they should be. When the Articles of Confederation were written in 1781, it did not provide for an executive branch. In 1787, at the first Constitutional convention, the delegates agreed that there had to be an executive branch which would be separate from the legislative branch. They felt this would avoid any corruption and would provide for checks and balances to prevent dictatorial rule by this branch of government. Though small, the executive branch plays a crucial role in running the United States.
Jefferson feared that his death would destroy the government. But Washington recovered, and within a month he was back on the job. At first he had little to do. He began by appointing his cabinet: Henry Knox as Secretary of War, John Jay as Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Alexander Hamilton as Secretary of the Treasury, Thomas Jefferson as Secretary of State, and Edmund Randolph as Attorney General.
Tyranny is one of the worst things that can happen to a country, it assumes control and, will make you do stuff you don't want to. The Articles Of Confederation was the first step the American Colonists took to get freed from tyranny , but that fizzled. The Articles Of Confederation was missing numerous key parts, for example, a solid government, there was no president. Additionally it didn't make a currency for the entire country. When you went to different states, they all had distinctive currency, so it was very difficult to purchase things, because individuals didn't know the amount of one coin was worth contrasted with another.
Federalists The Federalists had a better belief on improving the government. They believed in ratification. They knew if you separated the powers of government under three branches, it would protect the rights of people. No one branch has more authority than the other.
“The accumulation of all powers..in the same hands, whether of one or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, 1788) ( Background Essay) This quote explains the reasoning for one of the framers, (B) Separation of Powers. The framers of the constitution were created to prevent tyranny and create a stronger government that would hold the nation together. Tyranny ultimately means harsh, absolute power in the hands of one individual-- like a king or dictator. The constitution guarded against tyranny in 4 ways: (A)Federalism, (B)Separation of Powers, (C)Checks & Balances, and (D)Small State-Large State.
Democracy allows for different interpretations as to how to legislate and enforce laws. Presidents are given the task to adapt and create a strategy for the situation they are placed within. While this may lead to controversial decisions, it has the ability to affect the world in a positive manner. Lyndon B. Johnson and Franklin D. Roosevelt are two presidents who affected the world greatly.
History has shown on numerous occasions Congress losing powers to the executive branch. During the Civil War, Lincoln from no authority by Congress “declared martial law in many northern communities, suspended habeas corpus, blocked southern ports, southern property was confiscated” and performed many actions without the authority of Congress (Graber, M., & Gillman, H., 1988, p. 291). When Congress was back in session they retroactively ratified Lincoln’s decisions and
With that being said our modern presidents have been given more power than they need and more than they know what to do with causing issues throughout the country and the world. Modern presidents have the power of total destruction, they have the power to manipulate, and their power affects everyone and is not formally given to them. Presidents today have the informal
Niccolò Machiavelli, better known as the father of modern political theory, wrote the famous socio-political treatise The Prince, during a dark time in his career. In The Prince, there are several policies that can be found in the American government, specifically in the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights. Many of our American leaders have adopted similar policies as Machiavelli's book is recognized as a political manual for many leaders. Obviously, there are many common themes in The Prince and The United States government's policies, such as the idea of arming one's citizens along with how leaders are brought to power; however, there are also many differences, in particular, the distribution of power in government.
The United States Constitution and the composition of the government was created by a tremendous amount of high-level debates. Through these debates, the Constitutional Convention of 1787 reached the system of politics that our government has consisted of for over 200 years. It was created to be a system of checks and balances, making sure that no man nor group has excess power. It is made up of three branches, interacting with and constraining one another since the ratifying of the United States Constitution.
Even though all the presidents took the same oath to uphold the same Constitution, times have changed since George Washington was president. Today, with the increase of social media, the growth of the federal government, disagreements between parties, along with all of the current issues, make the president’s job one of the hardest. The job of the president is not impossible, what makes it extremely difficult is that no one in Congress is willing to change the status quo. I think there is so much responsibility placed on the president that it is almost impossible to be truly successful. I think all of the stress the president undergoes daily working with his staff to find solutions to current issues that will benefit most Americans, provides
President George Washington knew that a lot of his accomplishments would be viewed as precedents. As being the first President, he set numerous precedents, a significant number of which are still being implemented today. He chose to be called Mr. President as opposed to the title of being called a King, he then created the Presidential Cabinet, established the term limit of two terms for Presidency and was first President to create foreign policy. Those who served under the first Presidential Cabinet that was created by George Washington was: • Vice President John Adams • Secretary of State- Thomas Jefferson • Secretary of The Treasury- Alexander Hamilton • Secretary of War-
During this seminar I greatly expanded my knowledge on the legislative and executive branch. I learned there have been numerous times when neither branch upheld the values of the Constitution. Our government spent money for a phone booth and sued the state of California over the issue of immigrants. Also, I learned more about partisan politics and how disagreements arise because of this. One party wants to do it their way, while the other believes that isn’t the correct path to follow.