How Did Machiavelli's Impact On Leadership

Niccolò Machiavelli was an Italian philosopher, writer, and politician who lived during the Renaissance period. He is best known for his book "The Prince," which is a treatise on political theory and leadership. In this book, Machiavelli discusses his views on commoners and nobility and how they impact leadership (Machiavelli, 2003).
Machiavelli believed that most commoners were generally weak and easily swayed by their emotions (Machiavelli, 2003). He believed that they lacked the intelligence and foresight necessary to make good decisions and that they were easily manipulated by those in power. On the other hand, he believed that the nobility were strong, intelligent, and capable of making good decisions. He believed that they were natural

If a leader believes that commoners are weak and easily manipulated, they may be more likely to use fear and intimidation to maintain control. They may also be less likely to listen to the opinions and concerns of the common people, which can lead to resentment and rebellion. On the other hand, if a leader believes that the nobility are natural leaders, they may be more likely to give them preferential treatment and ignore the needs and concerns of the common people. This can also lead to resentment and rebellion, as the common people feel that they are being ignored and oppressed (Machiavelli, 2003).
Machiavelli's views on commoners and nobility also have implications for the type of government that is most effective (Skinner, 2000). Machiavelli believed that a strong, centralized government was necessary to maintain order and stability. He believed that a republic was the best form of government, as it allowed for the rule of law and the participation of the people in government. However, he also believed that a strong leader was necessary to maintain order and stability, and that this leader should be a member of the nobility (Skinner,