ipl-logo

How Did Sectionalism Lead To The Civil War In 1860

1186 Words5 Pages

A shift from compromise to unavoidable conflict in 1860 led to the Civil War because of the debate over whether slavery was moral, who had the right to institute slavery, and where slavery should be allowed. Overall, slavery, particularly the division it caused, was the main cause of the Civil War in the United States. The main start of sectionalism in the United States was during the Era of Good Feelings. Although this is typically regarded as an era of nationalism, the South grew more reliant on cotton and plantations as the pillar of their economy, leading to slavery being in their best interest. However, the North did not rely directly on enslaved labor, rather they were more manufacturers and had industrialized. The cause of this was …show more content…

The Compromise of 1820 was caused by Missouri wanting to be admitted to the Union as a slave state. This would have caused an imbalance between slave states and free states in Congress. So, the free states, the North, opposed Missouri being a slave state. The compromise was possible because there was also the admittance of Maine to the Union as a free state, so Missouri could be a slave state without disrupting the balance in Congress. There was also the 36°30' line that started from Missouri. Any state above the 36°30' line, excluding Missouri, would be a free state. Any state below it would be a slave state. At this point in time, the North and South were able to find a compromise, primarily because they all still wanted to be a part of the Union. There were no ideas of secession …show more content…

Notably, Senator Henry Clay gave a speech to the Senate that he could not imagine that a slave state, in this case, South Carolina, actually wanted to secede from the Union in 1833 (Document A). The growing tension between the North and South seemed to not phase the Republicans, Henry Clay’s party. Perhaps if the idea of secession had been taken carefully from the beginning, the Civil War would have been different. Nonetheless, the ever-growing debate on slavery was growing. In 1834, an annual report from the American Anti-Slavery Society labeled slave owners as thieves of humans and that slaves should be freed immediately (Document B). This labeling of slave owners as immoral and unjust leaves little to no room for compromise. While this was the Anti-Slavery Society Convention, it should be significant that there are people in the North who hold these beliefs. The presence of these beliefs allows for them to spread and grow throughout the

Show More
Related

  • How The Missouri Compromise And The Fugitive Slave Act Of 1850

    1174 Words  | 5 Pages

    The North, which were anti-slavery, argued that Congress had the power to prohibit slavery in the new state. Meanwhile, the South,which were pro-slavery, believed that states, rather than the government, should have the right to decide whether they wanted slavery or not therefore they argued that the State of Missouri had the right to decide whether they wanted to be a slave state or not and that it should not be up to the Congress to decide. In an effort to preserve the balance of power in Congress between slave and free states, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise which allowed Missouri to be a slave state and allowed Maine into the Union as a free state to resolve crisis, which a member of Congress, Henry Clay, offered. The history surrounding the nineteenth century led to the establishment of the Missouri

    Read More

  • How Did James Monroe Impact On American History

    2133 Words  | 9 Pages

    So congress made a compromise, the Missouri compromise signed in 1820 - Missouri could join as a slave state and Maine had enough people to become a free state , so it did. Missouri Compromise started the outlawing of slavery in the Louisiana Territory. This also produced 2 new amendments. One was no new slaves are allowed in the state and two was all free slaves born after admission of the new

    Read More

  • Missouri Compromise Of 1850

    597 Words  | 3 Pages

    The issue of slavery expansion in the West emerged significantly with Missouri’s intention of entering into the union as a slave state, thus enabling the constitution of the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Through Missouri’s aspirations the stabilization of power between the free states and slave states in the senate was undone. To revitalize the equilibrium, a consensus was reached where Missouri would enter as a slave state, with Maine entering a free state to sustain the balance. In subsequent years as the United States gained new territories though the Mexican-American War the slavery expansions disputes reemerged in the senate. California sought admission into the union as a free state, and the equal balance of slave states and free states was,

    Read More

  • Discuss The Causes Of The Civil War Dbq

    661 Words  | 3 Pages

    The first main cause of the Civil War was economic differences between the Northern and Southern states. During the first few decades of the 19th century, the North had an industrial revolution that brought an economy that relied on laborers. While at the same time, the South continued to rely on slaves for their farming and the production of cotton. The Northerners did not need slaves for their economy, but the Southerners could not make any profit without cotton or slaves. In the 1860’s, the North had twice as many railroads as the South, and the South had a bigger cotton production because of their slave population (Document A).

    Read More

  • Matthew Mason, Slavery And Politics In The Early Republic

    1347 Words  | 6 Pages

    The compromise authorized Missouri to have no restrictions on slavery, but self-proclaimed the free state of Maine. It created a line through the remanding Louisiana Purchase and restricted slavery above line but allowed it below. The Missouri crisis complex the level of political debate over slavery. Mason believes that the “legacy of a decade’s worth of political combat involving slavery was on display” (179). The purpose was to make Missouri into a slave state and Maine a free state.

    Read More

  • Harriet Beecher Stowe's Life During The Civil War

    443 Words  | 2 Pages

    One major event was the Missouri Compromise, In 1820 there were 11 free states and 11 slave states in the United States (). When Missouri proposed to enter the union as slave state, it caused the balance between the free and the slave states to be unequal. Once that happened Senator Henry Clay proposed the Missouri Compromise, which would admit Maine as a free state and Missouri as a slave state. As part of the Missouri Compromise Congress created the imaginary line at latitude 36,30 N. Which meant slavery would be permitted in the Louisiana Purchase south of this line. This event did not go over well because it showed the north in an aggressive manner about being anti-slavery which caused more tension over slavery.

    Read More

  • The Potential Consequences Of The Dred Scott Case

    1566 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 foreshadowed the states that would be free and those that could carry slaves. The states along the division were more likely to not want slavery than the Deep South. The lower states needed the slaves more for farms and other laborious tasks. The war with Mexico contributed to the fighting over the new states that can and cannot have slaves. The states did not think that the federal government should have the right to determine which state had the right to have

    Read More

  • Causes Of The Compromise Of 1850

    518 Words  | 3 Pages

    Anything above this line would be permitted into the union as a free state (except Missouri) and anything south of the line as a slave state. Most people in the North were happy with this compromise, but enslavers in the South were enraged at the ban on slavery in territories that may want to become states.

    Read More

  • Westward Expansion Essay

    958 Words  | 4 Pages

    The primary reason was that so many states were joining the country, and the country was fighting over which ones would be free states or slave states. In fact, it was a common discussion at most dinner tables. At first the issue was instantly resolved. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 made Missouri a slave state and Maine a free state, thus conserving the fragile balance that Congress had created. However, this did not apply to the states that were part of the Louisiana Purchase.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Nullification Crisis

    937 Words  | 4 Pages

    They were above all of the other slave states, but they wanted to be able to still own slaves. When they were allowed to become a slave state, this put the North at a disadvantage of 15-16 representatives in elections. The Missouri Compromise allowed states that were below the 36-30 line to become slave states when they were admitted to become a state. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 repealed the 36-30 dividing line for slavery in the Louisiana Purchase area. Tensions rose between the North and South even more than they had in the Nullification

    Read More

  • How Did Slavery Cause Secession

    1451 Words  | 6 Pages

    ‘Slavery was the root cause of secession’. ‘November 6 1860, Lincoln was elected president of America which resulted in panic emerging in the South’ . The election of Lincoln as president who was a Republican leader meant that ideologies, movements and values from the North would be implemented in the South which meant the abolition of slavery. Slavery was a huge characteristic of the South as the economy; politics; social status and psychological mind-sets were influenced by the process of slavery. The southern white population then derived the idea of secession which meant the South would gain independence from Northern aggression .

    Read More

  • Dbq Era Of Good Feelings

    557 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although in the Missouri Compromise, Missouri became a slave state and Maine became a free state, it was an example of disunity. All new states north of the Mason-Dixon Line would be free and new states southward would be slave states. As a result, there was also an unbalanced sectional population between the North and South. (Doc. E & F).

    Read More

  • Essay On What Caused The Civil War Dbq

    484 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the North slavery wasn't practiced. The economy of the North was mainly dependent on industry. The North depended on the South for

    Read More

  • Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

    1121 Words  | 5 Pages

    Clay wanted to keep the nation together. Henry Clay, a Senator, was someone who wanted to keep the nation together, so he gave a speech to the Senate in 1833 about how South Carolina cannot secede and become an independent state, and doesn't want to. “I say it is impossible that South Carolina ever desired for a moment to become a separate and independent state” (Doc A). For the people that were against slavery, they held anti-slavery conventions, talking about how awful slavery is and even called slave

    Read More

  • What Caused The Civil War Essay

    574 Words  | 3 Pages

    So they became more focused on industry. Items like cotton, wool, pig iron, weapons, furniture, and other important items were being produced at a faster rate than the south. " By 1860, 90 percent of the nation 's manufacturing output came from the northern states” (Industry and Economy during the Civil War) The need for slaves in the north had reduced drastically. Slavery wasn 't needed in the North as much as it was in the south.

    Read More

More about How Did Sectionalism Lead To The Civil War In 1860

Open Document