Niya Sheppard AP World History Period- 5 September 2, 2016 Unit 2 - Chapter 4 Eurasian Empires, 500 BCE - 500 CE How did Persian and Greek civilization differ in there political organization and values ? The Persian political organization was much larger than the Greek political organization. The Persians had one state that stretched from Egypt to India, while the Greeks had small settlements and about 100 independent city-states. The population difference was also a major difference. Persian civilization had a size of 35 million people and the Greek civilization just about 2 million to 3 million. The Persian governors placed a very effective administrative system which was called satraps, which was in each empire’s twenty-three people earn responsibility while lower-level …show more content…
The values of the Roman republic, included rule of law, upright moral behavior, the rights of citizens, and a political system that offers some protection to the lower class. The Rome army also helped the city become a success because it was drawn from the growing population of Italy and was renowned for being well trained, well fed, and well rewarded. This showed the people around the city that the Roman republic cared for everyone and was very straight forward about what they expected in their city. 6. How & why did the making of the Chinese empire differ from that of the Roman Empire? The Chinese empire represented an effort to recreate imperial traditions that had already existed but drifted away from the Xia, Zhou, and Shang dynasties. With these imperial traditions having a background in China, the process of creating the empire was much quicker. Rome was a new which meant it had to be created and developed into the empire it was, while the Chinese empire had a brief past. 7. In comparing the Roman and Chinese empires, which do you find more striking—their similarities or their
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
The Han Dynasty of China and the Pax Romana coexisted in different regions of the world for a short period of history. Each of them had their own belief of government. For the Han Dynasty it was all about following the Confucian values that had been established, and for the Romans, it was almost a new era of Roman rule, this time with less expansionism. While there were many similarities between the two, there were also significant differences because of things such as societal practices, religion, and power structure. Militaries were different, cultural outlook was different; these were things that ultimately would affect each empire in the end.
When comparing the Roman Republic to the Roman empire they are very different, but also share a few common grounds. The Roman Republic was formed in 509 BC. Once it began to expand it began the most powerful nation in the world (Admin ). However, once the senators, representatives, and congressman started to become more powerful, things started to become very chaotic. Therefore, 500 years later the Roman Empire had been created.
The time is the third century BCE to the third century CE, two major world empires are in reign; these empires are Han China and Imperial Rome. Both of these empires rule in many of the same ways, yet are vastly different in the way they rule. During this time empires everywhere were growing, and people were learning to live in new ways as new forms of government become more present in society. In Han China, Emperor Gaozu takes over as first emperor as the Han Empire. His empire controls China for almost four hundred years.
Comparing the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire in the Classical Period were similar in their downfall and advances, but differed politically. The Roman Empire gradually fell for many different reasons. In the same way, the downfall of the Han Dynasty was caused by a multitude of factors, many of these being the same as the Roman’s. Just as the Roman Empire was hurt by the number of nomadic invasions, so was the Han.
During the Classical era, civilizations around the world had to develop and perfect their own methods of governing their empires. Two of the largest empires at the time were Han China as well as the Imperial Roman Empire. As they created their own ways of running a kingdom, they began to create ideas that were comparable, but also had ideas that were contradictry. Both of these kingdons were focased on expansion of their boarders and their culture. These empires had an agricultural base that was the building blocks for their power.
Between the 200 B.C.E - 750 B.C. Erra years there ruled two empires both alike in dignity, the great Roman Empire and the Qin and Han Empires. Both began forming their empires into a centralized dictatorship, administered by a large and effective bureaucracy. Similarly in reaching their climax of final ruling, their economics and military increased. Both empires were not only able to to expand their territory vastly, but also dividing the empires into provinces governed by officials while doing so. The empires took on competing rivals, the Romans fought against Greece triumphing into success.
They generated new order and collected more taxes to support the military and government. By doing that, they had the resources they needed for everyday The military helped protect those items along with the Han people. Rome on the other hand, controlled its empire differently. What the Romans did was have the senate run the government and have geographical features distinguish boundaries.
The Han dynasty and Roman Empire developed approximately around 300 B.C.E- 400 C.E. They both faced a similar issue; they had to figure out a way to govern a vast land. The Han Dynasty’s political authority were highly influenced by their religion. The Roman Empire however were highly influenced by an emperor highly selected by the people.
The Qin and Han employed different philosophies on how to run their dynasties. The Qin used controlling Legalistic ideas while the Han used the relationship building Confucianism. The Qin and Han had a different relationship with outsiders because the Qin preferred to keep foreigners out while the Han wanted to build a relationship with them. The Qin and the Han each contributed to the growth of China’s culture and expansion. The developments in trade, foreign relations, and building expansive building projects in the Qin and Han Dynasties effected the design of every dynasty
Throughout ancient history, there have been many ancient battles in which had two great and powerful empires were fighting due to control over land, one’s belief system, and wanting an abundance of resources. Of these empires, two of them, the Greek and the Persian, were at enmity with each other. These empires were about as similar as the moon and the son, in fact, they were almost polar opposites. Although in many instances the Persian and the Greek empires have an abundance of differences, there are also some similarities. Persia was founded by Cyrus the Great.
Han China and Mauryan India had many similarities. They were both bureaucracies, they both had emperors, and both empires established their laws on religious belief. They also had a lot of contrasting ideas for positioning their people, and they had contrasting ideas for their different religious standpoints. One empire put more weight on logic, and the other more on religion.
The Assyrian empire and the Persian empire were two of the earliest major empires in the world. The Assyrians came in to power first, ruling from 900 BC to about 600 BC and with the help of Cyrus the Great, the Persians rose to power around 550BC. The Assyrian and Persian militaries shared many similarities, but they also differed in some aspects. Some of their similarities include their battle tactics, the organization of their armies, and their success in conquering societies. One of the major differences that stood out the most was that the Assyrians used a more brutal approach when conquering and the Persians used a more enlighten approach and were more tolerant.
Amidst the Classical Era, a time-period in which some of the greatest technologies and communications were introduced, reigned a multitude of empires. Two specific empires were of the greatest to have ever existed: the Persian Empire, which lasted approximately 200 years, and the Maurya Empire, which fell after about 150 years. Individually, the empires had their own accomplishments and their own legacy, however, there existed key similarities and differences between the three empires, especially politically. The Persian Empire utilized a bureaucratic system where the empire was divided into multiple sections, similarly, the Maurya Empire used a system that fractionalized its empire. Nevertheless, the two empires differed in their religious
Ancient India and China were the greatest and the oldest civilizations that have ever existed. They have some significant differences within the civilizations, such as the political aspect, religion, and geography. As they have many differences, there are just as many similarities between the two. Geographically speaking, India is in a humid subtropical area, so it was hard to store food but had the Himalaya Mountains to help cover from winter cold and invasions.
Ancient Rome was a huge empire that ruled over the Mediterranean. Rome gave many gifts to other civilizations, for instance, the way the Colosseum was built was introduced to other civilizations. The Roman republic was somewhat meeting the common good. Common good meaning everyone was being affected in a good way. If I had to give Rome a grade it would be an A minus.