In the late 1980s and early 1990s, a gang called the “Dotbusters” threatened and attacked Indians in the Jersey City/Hoboken area. Named after the traditional Hindu bindi, the gang was mainly comprised of teenagers who were unhappy with the growing Indian population in Jersey City. This gang successfully attacked innocent Indians like Navroze Mody, Kaushal Saran, and Bhered Patal, leaving them either severely injured or dead. The prominence and recurrences of their attacks from 1987-1993 begs the question, how did the Indian population of Jersey City respond to these attacks, both publicly and privately? To answer this question, one needs to examine the Dotbusters’ motivations, as well as the non-Asian Jersey City public’s reactions to the …show more content…
The Dotbusters’ attacks on the Indian-American community in Jersey City were fueled by the Dotbusters’ intense prejudicial hatred towards Indians, which was mainly influenced by the separatism in Jersey City at the time. Jersey City officials did little to protect the Indian community and to bring the Dotbusters to justice, so Indians did what they could to get the wheel rolling. Indians turned their fear and anger into a movement, and they unified into a close-knit community in Jersey City and protested against the Dotbusters’ actions and the officials’ lack of action, despite this gang’s efforts. The Dotbusters’ attacks on the Indian-American community in Jersey City were mainly racially-motivated – the non-Asian public in Jersey City were disgruntled because they felt that the Indians were invading and taking over their home socially and …show more content…
Massoon explains that the Indians were “‘paralyzed and petrified with fear,’” which is made clear in Sudershan Singh pondering, “‘Why they kill us?... We are Americans, too,’” and in an unnamed Indian shop owner explaining that, “‘We [just] want to make America beautiful. We don't want to spoil it. America is a land of chances… That’s why everybody is here,’” (Marriott, 1987). Many Indians, like Massoon, became too afraid to wear traditional Indian clothings, such as saris or bindis, in public. Some parents refused to send their children to school in order to protect them and because the children often felt insecure and ashamed of their heritage because of the bullying and bias (Kamen, 1992). A few businesses owned by Indians were forced to close because Indians were afraid to shop in Jersey City (James, 1989). No Indians walked alone, because, according to Vishnu Patel, they were “‘afraid to go out.’” Patel explained that even “‘people who work nights or return late at night are not going to their jobs,’” (Narvaez, 1987). Leaders in the Indian community were outraged by the police, because they felt that not enough effort was being put into stopping the crimes (1988, Mar. 16). Some Indians even enrolled in karate classes, so they would be able to properly defend themselves
The website I chose for this assignment is http://www.legendsofamerica.com/na-ghostdance.html. I chose this website because it looked like it had a lot of information about my topic and there were pictures on the side to help me. It also was last reviewed not too long ago so that shows that the information should be reliable and trustworthy. This site is related to what were are talking because the Ghost Dance movement basically led to the Wounded Knee Massacre.
Indians have always had their things taken from them by whites. However, the U.S. Government may have gone too far on this one. After being taken from their original lands and put on small reservations, some Indians have been wanting all whites to suffer. These people of the Sioux tribe were called Ghost Dancers. They believed if they did a certain dance, their gods would destroy the U.S. and similar establishments.
The Dead Rabbits riot was the single greatest gang-related disturbance in United States history, the culmination of one of the biggest rivalries of the nineteenth century (“Dead Rabbits Riot”). This feud was filled with robbery, prejudice, murder, and corruption. Although these two gangs clashed over racial, social and political difference, they also were similar in their disturbing yet impressive ferocity. The Bowery Boys and the Dead Rabbits were large, influential, and successful gangs, but had contrasting backgrounds, practices, and political views. These differences helped spark one of the most infamous rivalries in United
Essay Outline The human race that inhabited the lands earlier than anyone else, Aboriginals in Canada had conquered many obstacles which got them to what they are today. In the past, Canadian Aboriginals have dealt with many gruesome issues that primarily involved the Canadians opposing them or treating them like ‘‘wards.’’ The Indian Act is a written law which controls the Indian’s lives and it is often amended several times to make Indian lives either peaceful or cruel but especially, cruel. Aboriginals found the Indian Act a massive problem in their lives due to it completely controlling them and how they lived on their reserve.
The NYPD is perhaps the most difficult to understand the source of their irrational actions toward the five teenage boys who are a mere 14 and 16 years old. The police officers and the detectives come from various cultural backgrounds: Caucasian, Latino, Black, etc. At first glance, it could be argued that the NYPD is simply overwhelmed by the Crack Wars and the increase in crime which coincided. Offered as almost a natural conclusion by the various interview comments, the officers immediately associate Ms. Meili’s attack with the group of over twenty-five teenagers, some of whom were causing various smaller crimes elsewhere, in Central Park that night. It is quite clear that these men cannot conceive of any other perpetrators, and thus begins a series of unethically long and abusive interrogations of these five boys.
The focus of this study is on the 1921 Tulsa, Oklahoma race riot. Although there was a major impact on the entire community, this paper will only focus on the riot’s impact on the “black” community and the local government’s actions in response to the impact. I will evaluate the extent of which the local government’s response to the race riot of 1921 increased the negative effects on the black community. I will compare the records the Red Cross, the National Guard, and other groups to find consistency between the recorded death tolls and other relevant information. Then, I will compare an interview with Olivia Hooker, a survivor of the riot, to online sources to better understand the social climate which the local government was operating
#1 The biggest argument that people make for the teams keeping mascots and their names is that a small percent of Native Americans are really “offended” by them. The percent of Native Americans that are offended shouldn’t be ignored just because they are a small percent On top of that, the statistics involved are complicated and hard to verify. #2 Teams seem to “target” Native Americans: Use their image and names with less worry about retaliation because they are a minority and would be less likely to retaliate than another group, in the case of their culture being attacked #3 The image of another culture (which is more prominent and larger in our society) wouldn’t be used as a mascot or team name because it would offend a larger group
He never has to wait long. He killed the Indian man named Walker after his life insurance policy and proved his death by drink poising (125). • Government has not shown any interest to help Indian people from murders. Letters sent to Washington, D.C. begging for help went unanswered (126). • Agents are quick to move in and declare local Indian landowner’s incompetent in order to provide them with white guardians who have the authority to lease their land to oil companies.
I had previously discussed the mistreatment of Indians in the
Only in the past decade have historians begun to examine the meanings and functions of martial race ideology in its late Victorian context. This scholarship treats martial race ideology as a British fabrication, a calculated set of beliefs born out of specific recruiting needs, a uniquely colonial understanding of the Indian society, and 19th century conceptions of race. The majority of studies argue that these beliefs came to their most coherent expression in the years between 1880 and 1914. In this period, advocates of martial race policies consciously and systematically sought to spread information about the martial worthiness and unworthiness of different groups of Indians. British officers wrote a series of handbooks on the merits of
The Oglala Lakota Indians felt their rights and values from government treaties were not being abided by, and they believed their condition could be positively altered. While there were many shoot-outs during this incident, it all came to an end after the second death of an Oglala Lakota tribe member. The lack of human rights and government support lead to the violent reaction of some Oglala Lakota members, a great example of how a social problem can lead to violence. The conflict perspective views violence as a tool to enhance or protect one’s own interest.
1. Pratt opposed reservations because Jefferson’s treaty agreement meant the Great River would be the border between them and the whites. Indians would be isolated and not a part of the American life. 2. Schools would “kill the Indian and save the man” by introducing them to the life of an American.
After the purchase of the Louisiana territory from the french, Thomas Jefferson has sent Meriwether Lewis and William Clark to explore this new land, in hopes of locating useful resources, mapping territory and setting out a trade route toward the pacific ocean. So then set the long, treacherous trail Lewis and Clark has embarked on, encountering foreign environment and Native Americans. Who they eventually have started to disrespect them, by their act of violence, and motivation of cultural cleansing, therefore causing an act against different tribes. While Lewis and Clark ventured deeper into the west of this new American land. They encounter a large variety of Native Americans and started to act a behavior of aggression towards them.
Superman and Me - A Rhetorical Precis In “Superman and Me” (1998), an essay written for the Los Angeles Times, Sherman Alexie Jr. explains how the stereotype that Indian children are less intelligent than other children is not only incorrect, but harmful. Alexie provides examples of his own intelligence, having read “Grapes of Wrath in kindergarten” (5); and exhibits his personal experiences with the intelligence of other Indians (they “could tell complicated stories and jokes at the dinner table”) in contrast to how they acted around those who were not Indian (“They were monosyllabic”) demonstrating how Indians are “expected to fail” in a “non-Indian” society (6). Alexie draws contrasts between the stereotype and the truth in order to clearly
In the essay “Two Ways to Belong in America,” from 50 essays, Bharati Mukherjee contrasts the different views of the United States from two Indian sisters. The author distinguishes her American lifestyle to her sister’s traditional Indian lifestyle. Both sisters grew up in Calcutta, India, moved to America in search of education and work. Bharati adjusts to the American society very quickly, where her sister Mira clings to her Indian traditions more strongly. Despite both sisters living in America, only Bharati is an American citizen, while her sister Mira is not.