1) A spate of anti-war activism occurred across the Le Moyne campus during the years of the Vietnam War from the late 1960s into the early 1970s. Such activism included protests against the Kent State shooting and against President Nixon and anti-draft demonstrations. Still, the Le Moyne community wasn’t entire unified behind the anti-war movement. There is a tendency to caricature college campuses during the Vietnam War as having a unified, passionate anti-war movement across the entire campus. In reality, however, not everybody in the Le Moyne community supported the anti-war activism; some viewed the protests as un-patriotic and unnecessarily subversive. In the wake of the shooting at Kent State University on May 4, 1970, some students …show more content…
Father Reilly received a mass of displeased letters, most from parents of current students and Le Moyne alumni but also some students, disappointed that Reilly agreed to cancel classes in honor of the Kent State victims. The Kent State protesters were referred to as “dissident elements,” “radicals,” and “rioters” and many argued that days of mourning and flying the flag at half-mast should be reserved for military heroes who are serving in Southeast Asia. Some people did not agree with Father Reilly’s support of anti-war protesting occurring at Le Moyne, and were “deeply disappointed” with “the road upon which you seemed determined to lead Le Moyne.” In addition, a group of Le Moyne professors spoke out in support of American involvement in Vietnam and criticized violence by protestors across college campuses. The professors lament that college presidents, likely including Father Reilly, “see fit to capitulate to the demands of extremists” by enabling anti-war protesting on their campuses. It can be noted that there appears to be a significant generational split when it comes to opinions on the Vietnam War: many of those opposed to the war were young while many of the people who wrote to Father Reilly disagreeing with his stance on the war and on Kent State, as well as the 11 Le Moyne professors, were largely middle-aged or older. However, the strong, conservative movement of Le Moyne students who supported the war and felt that their voice was being marginalized on campus certainly cannot be discredited as minor or
Soldiers were dying, and they continued to be sent over to fight. The war itself provided a major wave of anti-war rhetoric that is still prominent today. The anti-war rhetoric was pushed through politicians, celebrities, concerts, protests, average citizens of different economic classes, but most importantly through song. “In the 1960s, several now-influential artists appealed to the disaffected counterculture’s emphasis on peace and love, especially with the sliding approval rates of the Vietnam War. As public approval of the Vietnam War dwindled in the latter half of the 1960s, popular music artists began to record songs that reflected this disapproval and ultimately became a new method of protest (Hopkins).”
This led to protests and riots, including the one at Kent State University, where four young lives were lost. The Kent State shooting occurred on the 4th of May in 1970. There was a previous rally three days prior, and coming to a close, they decided to plan the next for the 4th. It was to be held at noon and once advisors had caught news they made it clear that this was to be prohibited.
Violence is said to never be the answer in any situation, as determined by America's constitution. If the basis of America is non-violence, the question comes up, why did America fight in Vietnam? Civil Rights leader Martin Luther King Junior sets out to solve this tragedy by giving a speech.
“Americans want to be liked--and Senators are no exception,” quipped President John F. Kennedy in his book, Profiles in Courage. Wayne Morse, a U.S. Senator from the state of Oregon, exemplifies a rare exception to that sentiment. He rarely went along with the crowd. He remained calm when waves of pressure crashed against him. Senator Morse exhibited profound political courage when he and Ernest Gruening stood as the sole Senators to oppose the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution.
The Vietnam war, one of the longest war in the history of United States, is often regarded as the most controversial battle. The liberal, radical and conservative interpretation tries to shed some light on the dark and murky image of the war. Radical view suggests
Lowen wrote this book in order to uncover and educate; furthermore, this is important because events never told are now brought to light. Using detailed information and facts concerning racism, governmental over-watch, and the Vietnam War, Loewen argues that the American history textbooks
Not only is the younger generation fighting to prove a point to the elders, but Yale students ran away to fight in the war. As the authors described the reality of the story, they both explain, “Yale students did rush away to get weapons and join the war in 1775” (Collier and Collier 214). The majority of the older generation did not go run to join the fight, but most young teens did. Even though the students think that they were doing something brave or bold, they did not listen to their parents to tell them otherwise.
In 1970, several hundred colleges and universities experienced strikes. This sentiment was not limited to home, even soldiers carried the same mentality. They experimented with drugs, openly wore peace symbols, and disobeyed the command of their superior officers. The decline in discipline was a sign that the United States must leave Vietnam. Public support for the war was not helped by a publication that detailed the My Lai Massacre.
In Martin Luther King Jr's passionate speech about America's involvement in Vietnam, he manages to create a strong and compelling argument that America's involvement in unjust . He does this by appealing to certain issues the public see as important, using irony, and using diction and tone in persuasive ways. Martin Luther King Jr says in his first paragraph that,"It seemed as if there was a real promise fr hope... to draw men and skills and money like some demonic destruction suction tube." Here, Martin Luther King Jr is getting the audience emotionally and completely invested by showing the effect of America in Vietnam on their lives. The audience now feel as though this is very important because it has to do with regular poor people and t effects them as well.
1 paragraph: The Spitting Image depicts the “Myth, Memory, and the Legacy of Vietnam to challenge the story of terrible treatments those returning Vietnam veterans had experienced, questioning this kind of widely-accepted beliefs, rendering readers to think deeply about whether they have been indirectly influenced or deceived by the political propaganda. The author mainly argues that anti-war activists actually spitted the truths of treatment towards Vietnam veterans into two distinct sides: Vietnam veterans were poorly treated by an anti-war groups----the author exemplified how a college teacher called a Vietnam veteran “killer” ----or “there were early hostility towards the anti-war movements. Political concerns play an enormous role by creating
In the autobiography, a Rumor of War, Philip Caputo, talks about his experience in the Vietnam War. He tells us why he joins the Marines until the day he was released from active duty. A rumor for the story about war and how it changed men like Phillip Caputo, John Kerry Silvio Burgio and Tim Carey. This paper is based on Philip Caputo and how the Vietnam War changed him through his time before the war, during the war and after the war.
On April 4, 1967 Doctor Martin Luther King Jr gave the speech, “Beyond Vietnam-A time to Break Silence.” In this powerful speech Dr. King addresses his followers, and explains why the same people who are advocating for civil rights, should also protest the war in Vietnam. Dr. King’s main appeal is towards pathos because he is explaining his reasons, most of which are moral in some way. Dr. King develops the central claim of the speech by explaining how the war is taking away resources from the poor, how the soldiers are disproportionately poor people, and lastly how the war is completely against his morals. His central claim of the speech revolves around war being an enemy of the poor.
I find Ho Chi Minh’s letter far more persuasive than Lyndon B. Johnson’s. Using ethos, pathos, and logos, he forms a solid argument that supports Vietnam’s stance on the war. He appeals to one’s emotions by expressing the injustices faced by his people, writing, “In South Viet-Nam a half-million American soldiers and soldiers from the satellite countries have resorted to the most barbarous methods of warfare, such as napalm, chemicals, and poison gases in order to massacre our fellow countrymen, destroy the crops, and wipe out villages.” Words such as “massacre” and “barbarous” highlight the severity of these crimes, and invoke feelings of guilt and remorse in the reader. Chi Minh uses ethos to support his logos, or logical, views on the
Martin Luther King Jr. was a social activist that led the Civil Rights Movement, and other movements until his assassination in 1968. On April 4, 1967 Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a speech named, “Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence” addressing the Vietnam War. The United States got involved in the Vietnam War because they wanted to stop the spread of communism. Due to the Vietnam War is that plenty of individuals, both Americans and Vietnamese were killed.
III: Reflections The interview with Ms. X flowed so easily; it quickly consumed nearly an hour and a half of our time. I felt conviction in my subject and topic choice(-,) but realized that the most daunting task would be trimming the interview to meet the requirements of this assignment. Offering so much that caught and captivated my interest, I was grateful that Ms. X gave me permission to record our interview. During the first few minutes, I realized that if I had to take notes while she was talking, I would not have been nearly as present in the conversation, and would have likely screwed up details later (-on) in the writing process.