Order Within the Roman Empire In the time of empires forming, it was extremely hard to manage on how to make a successful society. The Romans were no exception to having to struggle to make a successful empire. From starting as a city-state in Italy, to the Kingdom of Rome, the Period of the Republic, and finally the period of the Empire; there were many different phases of the Romans through trial and error to create a “good society”. Within this essay, we will discuss how the Romans used religious, government, and other freedoms to allow for a “good society” through the different society growths they experienced. Government. The Roman Republic started in 509 BC and turned from a Kingdom to a Republic once the patricians (now considered …show more content…
The simplest reasons as to what contributed to the Romans development of a good society was that they had a list of permanent laws that were created to bring order and stability. These laws were comprised into The Twelve Tablets. These tablets were a written form of the laws that applied to every citizen within Rome, whether that be wealthy or poor. The tablets were placed in the town center of Rome for all to view, these could not be destroyed and were a solid basis for all Romans. Although Romans were consistent in diversity between religion, government, etc., these strict laws allowed for a good society to be built by the Romans because regardless of differing opinions, all Romans had a set list of rules they could not stray from unless punishment would be …show more content…
By adding different successful governments in one, it was allowed to create a concept like the US’s checks and balances system but within Rome. Considering the time in the Romans society, this concept of checks and balances by combining 3 different forms of government was unheard of but turned out to be a very good idea. This idea of creating structure particularly is highlighted within the Roman family and economics. Being able to have rich people provide for the poor with help back, created a win-win situation without conflict, always having jobs available and money constantly circulating within the Empire. Although there was these different structures and ideas to create new ways, the Roman Empire was constantly changing and due to this, the Romans being able to set a foundation of 12 rules/laws it created order despite the chaos that may arise. Finally, religion specifically created a good society because it allowed for every citizen within Rome to have that sense of peace that there were certain elements that they could think and use on their own without government
Unlike, the Roman elite dominating society with
They generated new order and collected more taxes to support the military and government. By doing that, they had the resources they needed for everyday The military helped protect those items along with the Han people. Rome on the other hand, controlled its empire differently. What the Romans did was have the senate run the government and have geographical features distinguish boundaries.
Although one may argue that a government can ruin a society over time, an empire wouldn’t even be able to start to grow without a government to keep order and make laws. King Hammurabi was a Babylonian king who created the first written law known as “Hammurabi’s Code.” This was a significant turning point for society because now, everyone would know what must be done and not done, and it set an example for future empires. The Roman Republic thrived under a competent government. Octavian was the first emperor of Rome, and although he may have been cruel to his rivals, he was one of the best things to ever happen to Rome.
Rome was power hungry and didn’t think about long-term consequences. The Senate controlling the decisions of Rome held power unchecked by anyone. This can cause major problems for a country because many people have many different opinions. They desired to expand and rule a larger empire instead of bringing peace and evolutionary development to its population. Rome and America both created global structures, and the citizens and rest of the world were taken for granted.
As a Roman citizen, your citizenship varied. Some Roman citizens were full citizens, others had limited rights. Examples of citizen rights would be the right to vote, hold government careers, and indulge in business. However, this varied depending on the citizen. The Roman Republic is further demonstrated by the fact that becoming a citizen and enjoying the privileges that go along with it were more of a privilege than a fundamental human right.
The Romans were responsible for meeting the common good of the people of Rome, and I’ll grade them according to the five indicators of meeting the common good. I believe that the Roman Republic performed a good job when providing public services, and meeting the common good. The first reason why I believe the Roman Republic met the common good is, there were public baths that patricians and plebeians could all use. Baths were free, or very reasonably priced.
They concentrated on creating a system of jurisprudence for their realm and granting a high measure of freedom to those under their rule. The Romans were major benefactors of their own policies, for through them they improved their own civilization. Roads, aqueducts, and other construction projects throughout the empire did much to unite the diverse population. Romans themselves and their emperors was a superstitious people--not an uncommon trait among all commoners who believed in multiple gods at the time. Revering the gods was a direct result of a belief that the gods could benefit your cause or defeat you.
This stability helped people to focus on other things, like fine arts. Accomplishments and achievements from this time period would not have been possible without the peace and stability made by the government. Document six is a speech made by one of Rome's most famous lawyers, Cicero, about the importance of the law in Roman society. The laws kept the Roman Empire in order, and convicted guilty people of crimes. The law was also used for justice and fairness in society.
The Roman Republic was a representative democracy that evolved to address the changing nature of Roman society. It was founded in 509 BCE after the overthrow of the last Roman king, and it lasted for over 400 years. During that time, the Roman Republic expanded its territory, its population, and its power. It also faced several challenges, including civil wars, foreign invasions, and economic crises. Despite Rome’s founding on the principles of a republic, it struggled to fairly represent all its citizens.
It is the main system. Whenever there is a problem the people to ask the person who is leading them for help and guidance. So when an empire’s leadership is weak problems start to build and it causes chaos threw out the whole empire. Rome didn’t realize that assassinating each other to become emperor was not the right way until it was too late. The emperor didn’t care about the people in the empire all he cared about was the title of being emperor.
The constant change of emperors caused disorganization in the empire along with the injustices between the wealthy and poor as the wealthy could just bribe their way out of punishment and the government officials would accept the bribes from the rich, followed by severe taxing from the government because they needed to hire Germanic soldiers after their military soldier population decreased by natural disasters while inflation was going on from the government who were devaluing the coin by adding less silver with the wages staying the same, so some Romans switched to bartering and with bartering they didn’t have to pay the severe taxes leading them not being able to hire Germanic soldiers and other state expenses with invasions happening overtime but the Roman army not being able to defend against it because of them neglecting to practice with armor, and soldiers running away against unpredictable attackers with the disorganization within the military from constant emperor changes, furthermore Rome’s military population went down because of diseases and without people paying those severe taxes led to Rome’s fall.. When Rome’s Rome’s fall can be an example of what a society should have and shouldn't. The problems that Rome had should not happen unless it's a country that’s
The governmental structure and entertainment of civilizations are extremely important. It shapes the culture, defines legal systems and guidelines, and provides an example for citizens to follow. A well-designed government structure is a vital part of any civilization's development. Both the civilizations of ancient Rome and the United States share similarities. Not only in the government but also in the daily life of the citizens who live there.
The Roman republic created and embodied the idea that government officials were elected by the people and were responsible for representing them. This also touched upon the idea that if elected officials do not represent the interests of those that elected them, they could be voted out of the government. These principles have largely influenced the governmental development of Western nations, one of which being the United
From a simple city/state to two vast empires ruled by powerful dictators. As you (hopefully) know, Rome in its infancy was just a small village on the river Tiber. After Rome grew a bit it became more akin to that of a city/state, its central governing city still being Rome. The next key phase in the evolution of the government of Rome was the Roman monarchy. This phase is characterized by its monarch rulers and, has little known of it as few records exist dating back to that era.
The composition and the governing structure of the Roman republic was not uniform throughout its existence, but some of the fundamental elements of its government came into being in the immediate aftermath of the monarchy’s collapse. Therefore, it is unsurprising that many of these institutions were created in reaction to the monarchy and its failures, and thus were shaped by this relationship. For example, the fundamental opposition to monarchy and the rule of kings that came with the experience of the Kingdom of Rome, remained quite strong in the Roman mindset throughout the existence of the Republic and into the beginnings of the Roman Empire, and its influence can be seen throughout Roman political discourse especially in the discussion