How would you feel if someone told you that you couldn’t do something because of where you came from? How would you feel if people fought you for what you believed in?
This is what happened in the country of Sri Lanka. The Tamil people (the country’s minority) were being discriminated by the Sinhalese people (the country’s majority). The discrimination drove some of the Tamil people so far as to create terrorist groups (the Tamil Tigers) and it was a leading factor in the war that ensued. Although discrimination against the Tamil people was wrong, how the Tamil responded was also wrong.
The major reason for why the Tamil rebellion started is due to the laws that the Sinhalese majority created that discriminated against the Tamil’s. When Britain
…show more content…
The Sinhalese also passed laws that kept the
Tamils from becoming citizens. This caused a majority of the Tamil’s to want a separate state.
As tensions between the Sinhalese and the Tamils grew larger, some of the Tamil people decided they had enough and wanted to change to begin.
In 1976, tensions between the Tamils and the Sinhalese became larger, the Tamil group
LTTE (known as the Tamil Tigers) was formed. Throughout history, the Tamil Tigers are the most mentioned and notable Tamil rebel group, and they eventually became known as a terrorist group most known for suicide bombings and recruiting children as soldiers. In 1983, the Tamil
Tigers attacked an army convoy and killed thirteen soldiers. This attack initiated violent riots between Tamil civilians and Sinhalese people across the country. These riots caused the estimated deaths of 2,500 Tamils. In 1983 the Tamil Tigers declared what became known as the
“First Eelam War” that lasted until 1987. The intention of this war was to create a sperate Tamil state called Eelam. A few countries tried to bring peace to Sri Lanka. In 1987, India sent a peacekeeping force to Sri Lanka. After three years of trying to help with peace keeping
Next, both sections wanted equal representation in government. The admission of new states as free or slave was argued between the North and South and continued to aggravate the growing separation. Each section wanted laws that would benefit them, rather than the nation,
The quote above shows that Northerners and Southerners had different views on slavery and had disagreements about it. It also shows that the Southerner got frustrated with the north because they thought the north was stealing their properties. There was slavery in the South and Northerners wanted to end that so they started freeing slaves. Southern states seceded from the Union because they had a different economics. The South survived off of tobacco and other
The outcome of the election only further divided the nation by the secession of many Southern states from the nation. Many southerners believed they had no say in the election and decided to form their own government. The Confederate States of America were formed
“When human lives are endangered, when human dignity is in jeopardy, national borders and sensitivities become irrelevant. Wherever men or women are persecuted because of their race, religion, or political views, that place must-at the moment- become the center of the universe,” this was Elie Wiesel’s, nobel prize winner, quote. People have different points of views on other people, to be more specific on people on other races and religion. Some individuals have the mentality that there’s always a superior race. My opinion is that there is equality among every person in the world.
The south was not willing to give up their right of slavery. Due to the constant battle over slavery, the south seceded from the union and created their own nation. During the war, different battles were fought on the basis of slavery and
The Southern states were still strongly in support of slavery in the 1860s, while the North was strongly against it. The North was almost completely free states, and had new states entering as free, while the South was still fighting to keep slavery. The fight between the North and the South continued to progress, until the South felt that they no other option, so they decided to secede. They seceded one by one, each state persuading another. There were many issues, complaints, and fears that eventually led drastic decision of the South to secede.. .
A key reason for the South’s want to split was the idea of emancipation, it angered them immensely especially when coming from such an influential figure. Secession was very controversial because the North wanted to unite the country while the South wanted to secede. This brought new political actions having to do with proposed
Every human being belongs to a specific type of race or possibly multiple races depending on his/her background. As a population, society views their fellow citizens according to their certain race. For some, culture and traditions of their own race means everything to them and these people are proud of who they are and where they come from. However, for some races their background and pride carries burdens.
Many times in society there are people treated different based on their religion or their ethnic background. One very good example of this was in the book “Night” by Elie Wiesel. For starters, the concentration
India’s Partition Plan was one of the most controversial events of the 20th century, and it is still debated today. The British colonial government divided the Indian subcontinent into Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan, and the partition led to one of the deadliest migrations in history. While many supporters of the plan believed it would create stable, religiously homogenous nations, others argued it would lead to violence and bloodshed. In this essay, I will explore the arguments for and against India’s Partition Plan and examine the evidence supporting each perspective.
Since colonial times the United States had been divided into two completely different parts. The Northern states were mostly free states who believed slavery should be put to end. On the other hand, the Southernern states were slaves states, meaning they were pro-slavery. Therefore, their two ideas about slavery clashed with one another causing great deal of problems such as battles, fights, and debates between the North and South. These disagreements eventually lead to the Southern states seceding from the Union.
To this day people still continue to be treated different because of their race and it isn't fair, they are treated as a minority as if the other race were superior over
And it was this belief that bred fear and panic’ (Mukherjee 95). Religion played an important role in the increasing tensions between Britons and Indians prior to the revolt as Indians resented the persistent attempts at Christianisation promoted by their imperial rulers. This particular issue over ammunitions allegedly proved to be the last straw. Albert Pionke explains that
In 1971 the Ulster Defence Association, who was “an umbrella group for a variety of loyalist groups”, was founded. It became the largest loyalist paramilitary organisation of Northern Ireland with tens of thousands of members at its peak. While the UDA claimed to shield unionist communities from republican paramilitaries’ attacks the reality was far off as the UDA was involved in hundreds of murders during the Troubles while using the Ulster Freedom Fighters as a cover name. In 1992 the British government declared the UDA as illegal. Even after the UDA and multiple other loyalist paramilitary organizations joined in the self-described cease-fire by the IRA in 1992 violence has still been going on into the 21st century.
In the article Lalvani states that, the British “established the framework for India’s justice system, civil service, loyal army and efficient police force”. The British may have set up a government but the framework, however, did not include Indians. “ Of 960 civil offices...900 are occupied by Englishmen and only 60 by natives” (Doc 2). In no way are 60 voices of a race considered ‘savage’ going to overpower 900 white men, who could easily kill them for taking a stand, or trying to change the unjust laws that are