The Mauryan Empire leaders maintained legitimacy by using Soft Power, because of their influence on other empires and their people. They influenced other empires to support the people who suffer in their empire and to maintain a peaceful land where no one gets harmed and the crime rates are minimal. Amongst the many kings that employed Soft Power in their leadership, ChandraGupta and Ashoka employed Soft Power the best in the empire. ChandraGupta was the first leader in the empire and imposed laws that employed both hard power and soft power. Ashoka was the leader that slaughtered 250,000 men in war at Kalinga and after the war felt guilty for his actions and converted to Buddhism. First of all, Ashoka had written an edict that states, “ that …show more content…
At the same time he influences other empires to not got to war, so that the empire’s people remain happy and the king does not lose legitimacy. Ashoka is appreciated by all his people and influences others to maintain legitimacy without going to war. Second, ChandraGupta had employed soft power to maintain legitimacy by showing his affection to his people. ChandraGupta had written in the Arthasastra that any king that follows him, “shall provide orphans, the aged, the infirm, the afflicted, and the helpless with maintenance,”(ChandraGupta, Arthasastra Book II). ChandraGupta believed that the king should support his people when they are in need. This not only makes the people of his empire happy, but influences others to move to his empire to receive the same support. The people in other empires that are suffering will be motivated to follow him and support him for the good deeds he is doing for his people. The other kings will be influenced to adopt such a rule so that they can also maintain their empire. ChandraGupta then becomes a well known king to all and maintains his legitimacy as leader with support from all his
Ruthless of conqueror Imagine being in a time of war, Asoka was a ruthless conqueror of the Mauryan Empire. He let people die because they had something he wanted. Asoka was also a buddhist. He fought for more than he already had.
Being 520 years apart caused Han China and the Gupta Empire of India to differ in their political administration but share similarities in their economic development and treatment of women. Han China and the Gupta Empire differed in their political administration. While Liu Bang enforced a strong centralized government, Chandra Gupta implemented a highly decentralized government. The Han’s government, modeled after the preceding Qin Dynasty, meant that in theory the emperor’s power were absolute and infallible. As long as the emperor maintained the Mandate of Heaven, he would continue to command complete control.
The “noble deeds of Dhamma” was his goal from Buddhism and believed that if his relatives were to base their lives from this belief, they would achieve peace in the next life. Ashoka’s influence across India transformed Buddhism as a way of life and made a chain across the continent and the Silk
As shown in Document D, Asoka created over 30 edicts across India so travelers could see them. The edicts exhibit Asoka’s great deeds, such as planting medicinal herbs where they didn’t grow, digging wells along roads, planting trees, giving prisoners’ relatives time to plead their cases, and stating his opinion on improving the welfare of the world. As stated in Rock Edicts VI and XII from Document D, “I consider that I must promote the welfare of the whole world and hard work… I have done them in order to discharge my debt to all beings… By honoring them, one exalts one’s own faith and at the same time performs a service to the faith of others.” In Document E, Rock Edict XIII describes how the Beloved of the Gods (Asoka) wishes for friendship with the forest tribes of his empire.
Throughout the course of history, there have been many powerful rulers who have led supreme empires and kingdoms. The Mauryan Empire, a vast empire in Ancient India, had some rulers who wrongfully used their power. However, Asoka, ruler of the Mauryan Empire from 268 to 232 BCE, was enlightened because he deeply cared for his people, was extremely remorseful of his wrongdoings in his actions, and valued everyone despite their differences or what they have done in the past. Asoka was an enlightened ruler because he was willing to go beyond the unspoken limits to care for his empire and its residents' well being.
Caring For His People For instance, Ashoka was an enlightened ruler because of the way he cared for his people. Evidence of this is when Ashoka felt remorse for all the wars he fought and everyone he killed, so he decided to reject violence. Ashoka found enlightenment and changed the way of understanding history. He gave gifts
Ashoka ruled India from 268 BCE until he died in 232 BCE. Ashoka had edicts written on pillars, boulders, and walls. Ashoka became a Buddhist and worked on spreading the beliefs and faith throughout his reign. Ashoka is considered to be either a ruthless warrior or an enlightened ruler. Ashoka was enlightened because he respected all faiths and he cared about all life.
One reason why Asoka was an enlightened ruler is because he added Kalinga to the Mauryan Empire to improve his empire with more resources and strength. In document B “Asoka and the Decline of the Mauryas”, Ramilia Thapar wrote, “The conquest of Kalinga was of importance to the strategy and the economy of the Mauryan Empire… (It) stood in the way of the southern routes from the Ganges Valley, and it was also a powerful maritime area…” The conquering of Kalinga helped to protect the empire from invasion and provided them with a convenient source of income and welfare, which was essential for a strong empire. . Kalinga had many resources and also allowed trade through out the empire.
His approach to a powerful empire inspired a subservient convergent of customs and concepts along the axis of consolidation that his configuration of advancement had
Is Asoka a ruthless conqueror or is he a knowledgeable ruler? Asoka is one of the most acknowledged rulers of the Mauryan Empire. He ruled most of India over 2,000 years ago. Although he may be the greatest ruler of the Mauryan Empire, Asoka is still a merciless emperor because he has done many remorseful things that shall not be forgiven such as exterminating thousands of people and he has also conquered many lands to enhance his kingdom. Several individuals have been slaughtered by the hands of Asoka.
This is exemplified by the largest land-based power known to man: the Mongol empire. They were ruled by Genghis Khan who had around one hundred thousand well-trained warriors. Together, they fought to conquer more land in order to expand their strong empire. At first, they conquered small, minor territories to gain soldiers and more wealth. However, as time went on, the Mongol empire became extremely avaricious.
Building an Empire becomes problematic when the colonizers know nothing about the territory being colonized. Britain began colonizing India in the 1700s, completely ignorant about the people of India and their cultural and religious beliefs. Ignorance comes from a lack of knowledge. This lack of knowledge can be by choice, like in this situation. Despite their ignorance, Englishmen still came into India with an arrogant attitude.
Therefore, their political control was more controlled by spiritual beliefs. The king even appointed Dhamma Mahamatras to look after the spiritual well being of the people. The two civilizations both differed in their views for keeping peace within the empire but still the ultimate goal for each was to keep
Power can have the persuasive action in undoing the moral ethics of one’s character. This can be seen throughout history, such as World War II and proven by the actions of Napoleon in the allegory, Animal Farm, by George Orwell. As Lord Acton said “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” In history what was viewed as a villain, is never the same as the perception. A leader does not begin wanting to do wrong, they start with the best intentions, but power is a tricky thing.
He new that in order to gain control and remain social stability he had to push these strategies and policies through a dictatorial and authoritative style by using his charisma, influence, formal authority and