ipl-logo

How Does Descartes Deceptive God Exist

303 Words2 Pages

Descartes starts The Meditations by regarding all knowledge as deception imposed by a deceptive God. He does this in an effort to rid himself of any possible falsehood, so that he can attain what he can rebuild his reality with only what is deemed to be certain. Eventually he disregards the notion of a deceptive God, and is able to regain with confidence many of his previous convictions. The first step he takes in his search for truth is to identify whether or not he exists. After some analysis he concludes that he must exist, because he is able to question his existence. The evil genius could not impose any false ideas on something that did not exist, therefore, he takes his apparent consciousness as evidence for his existence by stating “I think therefore I am” (Meditation 2). …show more content…

To do this he identifies different types of ideas that he possesses “among these ideas, some appear to me to be innate, some adventitious, and others to be formed [or invented] by myself” (Meditation 3). Innate ideas are inherent in his intellect, and because of this he concludes them to be true. He holds that his conception of God, as a being who possesses all possible perfections, is an innate idea that has been implanted into his mind by his creator. To further justify this claim, he provides his version of the ontological argument, proving that the existence of a God who possesses all perfections is self-evident. In conclusion Descartes rids himself of the notion that God is deceptive by identifying the idea of God as innate, and then proceeding to prove the existence of that God through an ontological

Show More
Related

  • Descartes Second Meditation Rhetorical Analysis

    723 Words  | 3 Pages

    Descartes then attempts to define what he is. He previously believed that he had a spirit and body, by methods for which he was fed, moved, could sense, absorb space, had a distinct area and think. Each one of those methods are thrown into uncertainty except thinking. Since he can think, he should exist. He thinks about whether he no longer exists once his reasoning comes to a halt.

    Read More

  • Cogito In The Second Meditation By Rene Descartes

    1275 Words  | 6 Pages

    The next step that Descartes uses in the second meditation is the existence of this Godly figure. He questions his own beliefs with that of the God, and argues that a mind should be capable of thinking for them to be of existence, “Is there not some God, or some other being by whatever name we call it, which puts these reflections into my mind? That is not necessary, for is it not possible that I am capable of producing them myself?” He then puts forward that for one to be deceived by this “evil demon” as he describes it, they have to exist to be deceived.

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of René Descartes Mediations On First Philosophy

    1654 Words  | 7 Pages

    Notre Dame ID: 902008117 In René Descartes ' Mediations on First Philosophy, Descartes abandons all previous notions or things that he holds to be true and attempts to reason through his beliefs to find the things that he can truly know without a doubt. In his first two meditations Descartes comes to the conclusion that all that he can truly know is that he exists, and that he is a thinking being. In his third meditation, Descartes concludes that he came to know his existence, and the fact that he is a thinking being, from his clear and distinct perception of these two facts. Descartes then argues that if his clear and distinct perception would turn out to be false, then his clear and distinct perception that he was a thinking being would not have been enough to make him certain of it (Blanchette).

    Read More

  • Descartes's Argument On The Existence Of God

    753 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Meditation 3, the Meditator is creating arguments about the existence of god. This is where Descartes explains different reasons/premises to why god exists. Throughout Meditation 3, Descartes goes back and forth with his arguments arguing one thing then creating a counter argument to it at while still focusing on the main thing which is does god exist. For those wondering whether god does really exist stay tuned into what Descartes says. The premises from the meditation that claim god doesn’t exist are weak and invalid, and fail to give enough evidence to support the thought that god does not exists, which would conclude that God does exist.

    Read More

  • Descartes Non Deceive God Analysis

    726 Words  | 3 Pages

    We know clear and distinct perceptions independently by God, and his existence provides us with a certainty we might not possess otherwise. However, another possible strategy would be to change Gods role in Descartes philosophy. Instead of seeing God as the validation of clear and distinct perceptions, rather see him as a safeguard against doubt. This strategy, however, is a problem since it re-constructs the Meditations – Philosophical work of Descartes –.This is because it would not be God, who is the ultimate foundation of knowledge, but the clear and distinct

    Read More

  • The Ontological Argument

    1689 Words  | 7 Pages

    “Anselm says that once this definition of God is accepted, we can prove that such a God exists merely by analyzing the concept of God alone” (6). Because anyone one can understand the phrase: ‘that-than-which-no-greater-can-be-thought’, even a fool will agree that God exists within the mind. Concepts of omnipotence, omniscience, and amnibelevolence are complex philosophical concepts, these of which are said to be formed in

    Read More

  • Soren Kierkegaard's Argument Essay

    734 Words  | 3 Pages

    Soren Kierkegaard’s statement on the impossibility of proving the existence of God if He does not exist and the follies of making such an attempt if He really exists is very profound. The statement brings out an implication that one needs not to trouble self-concerning an unknown God which is a dangerous stance to take. A further inspection of the statement reveals some element of truth on which I concur with him on man’s limitation, a finite mind compared to an infinite mind. The conditionality of the statement sets the stage for the impossibility of proving the existence of God. An infinite God cannot be subjected to an investigation by finite minds and the fact that none has seen God does not negate His existence just the same way it cannot be denied with certainty that there are no airborne germs.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Descartes Cogito Argument

    862 Words  | 4 Pages

    In order for his opinions and knowledge not to interfere with his perception, he chose to doubt everything. And so, he even chose to doubt the existence of the physical body and continued to stay

    Read More

  • Descartes Cogito Argument Analysis

    884 Words  | 4 Pages

    For how he can be certain that 2+2= 4 and not 5, how can he know for sure that he is not being deceived into believing the answer to be 5 due to a demon. But even if an evil demon did indeed exist, in order to be misled, Descartes himself must exist. As there must be an “I”, that can be deceived. Conclusively, upon Descartes’ interpretations we can come to decipher that in order for someone to exist they must indeed be able to think, to exist as a thinking thing.

    Read More

  • Does Rene Descartes Question The Existence Of God?

    179 Words  | 1 Pages

    Rene Descartes argues that since he is capable of being deceived, therefore knows that he is a “thinking thing” (Descartes 65). First, Descartes questions the existence of everything, he begins to doubt if anything is real. After this, he continues by addressing beliefs that rest on his senses, questioning things such as his dreams and how his senses delude him during his sleep. He then continues addressing how the truths of arithmetic and geometry may not be immune to radical doubt. Although the truths of arithmetic and geometry seem so concrete, Descartes continues by supposing that there may exist an “evil genius” who “has employed all his energy to deceive me[him]” (Descartes 65).

    Read More

  • Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument

    539 Words  | 3 Pages

    p. 180). This is because a being who exists only as a mental notion is not so great as a being who exists in reality. Based on these facts and steps, Anselm conclude that Good must exist in reality, as well as an idea in the mind. To vividly understand the argument, it is important to understand the

    Read More

  • Kierkegaard Research Paper

    400 Words  | 2 Pages

    Our lived existence is associated to passion, decision, and action. None of which can be exhausted by any thought.   He believes that an existence can only be interpenetrated with thought.  

    Read More

  • Descartes Mind Body Dualism Summary

    1104 Words  | 5 Pages

    It embodies the insight that there is a serious muddle at the centre of the whole of Descartes theory of knowledge. He says that we do not hold a clear idea of the mind to make out much. ‘He thinks that although we have knowledge through the idea of body, we know the mind “only through consciousness, and because of this, our knowledge of it is imperfect” (3–2.7, OCM 1:451; LO 237). Knowledge through ideas is superior because it involves direct access to the “blueprints” for creation in the divine understanding, whereas in consciousness we are employing our own weak cognitive resources that

    Read More

  • Decartes

    1196 Words  | 5 Pages

    Thinking Things Exist, but not by Decartes’ standards According to the Cogito Doctrine Decartes is certain that he exists because he is a thinking thing. In my paper I am going to explain how Decartes justifies his claim that he knows for certain that he exists. After establishing a clear and concise understanding of Decartes’ justification I will point out that God’s existence is a fundamental premise in his argument for his existence.

    Read More

  • Nietzsche's Second Meditation

    1818 Words  | 8 Pages

    Then, he esteem, is not he, the germ of these meditation, not something? He has conceded that he has no gumption and no organic structure, but does that say he is no longer existent? He mentions that the physical worldly concern does not exist, which might also seem to imply his nonentity. And yet to have these questions, he must exist. There must be an "I" that can doubtfulness, be deceived, and so on.

    Read More

More about How Does Descartes Deceptive God Exist

Open Document