And this is not only a culturerelated problem since there are a lot of barriers and duties to penalize foreign manufacturer, that you can prevent my producing in the country that you’re selling. It’s an extremely powerful weapon to expand Nike’s commercial reach. Negative effect of Nike’s strategy Even though the business model is profitable and has its perks, Nike became also an example of how globalization brings with it many ethical questions. “Should multinational companies abide by so-called international labor and environmental standards, or is simply regulatory imperialism and de factor protectionism in another guise?” (Locke and Siteman, 2002). Since the beginning, Nike’s business model has been criticized because it’s based on the exploitation of countries in which workers were not treated fairly.
The relationship between that of Globalization and Nationalism Globalization is classed as the infusion of barriers to trade, communication, and cultural exchange. The world today has become very different from what it was previously, because of globalization. The constraints of geography shrink and the world becomes more singular and unified (Waters, 2011). Talking about the positive or negative effect of globalization, some see it as a power that destroys the heritage and culture of different ethnic groups around the world. some of the advantages of globalization are the increase of free trade between countries, cultural barriers are broken down between people, investors in developed countries can invest money into developing countries to
The relation between globalization development and human rights depends on analysis the concept of development and human rights, especially in the context of developing countries,human rights have become an integral part of the process of globalization in many ways. The Human Development Report of 1997 revealed that poor countries and poor people too often find their interests neglected as a result of globalization. Although globalization of the economy has been characterized as a locomotive for productivity, opportunity, technological progress, and uniting the world, it ultimately causes increased impoverishment, social disparities and violations of human rights and that is what we see today. International human rights law aims primarily to protect individuals and groups from abusive action by states and state agents,recent developments throughout the world, including failed states, economic deregulation, privatization, and trade liberalization across borders components of what has come to be known as globalization have led to the emergence of powerful non-state actors who have resources sometimes greater than those of many states their are Two opposing views of globalization and its relationship to human rights have emerged: some see the two topics as mutually reinforcing and positive in improving human well-being, while others view globalization as posing new threats not adequately governed by existing international human rights law. globalization has enhanced the ability
Clearly, as a phenomenon that affects the areas of the daily life of the inhabitants of a country, has implications both favorable and unfavorable to different countries. This model is widely criticized because it is common to developed and more power over other countries, countries gain a greater benefit than smaller countries and underdeveloped. There has been talk of great and rapid growth in some countries over the short and almost zero growth in some others. When talking about globalization a loss of sovereignty by nations which many claim against this phenomenon is also shown. Cultural impact of globalization We can say that culture is the set of forms and expressions that characterize a given society.
On the contrary, the United States labels imitators are counterfeits, clones, and copycats. However, imitation can lead to innovation. Sometimes basing something off of someone’s idea might lead to a nouveau idea. Innovation is known as the creative destruction that was caused by imitations which is defined as “diffusing innovations: The reason why all of this is a conflict is because developing countries lack funding. Due to the lack of money they are more likely to do something illegal and follow the path of counterfeiting.
This caused the disappearance of national differences. The second belief says globalization allowed people to express fervently their nationalist feelings. Because they are aware of the impact of globalization, they react by reinforcing their national particularities. Most scholars believe that nationalism would intensify in reaction to globalization. As the states become weaker, nationalism become stronger (Tamman, “Globalisation”).
The author states that Europe is a ‘Mongrel Continent’ due to the fact that it is made and remade by foreigners who come and positively change the countries as well as themselves. Most of the immigrants do not want to return to their home countries because they value the democracy they have acquired. Then, the author mentions that societies have the right to reject certain values which are deemed to be hostile to human rights. Practices such as forced marriages are not allowed. The author has used strong counter- arguments and good word choices in order to efficiently argue against his point of
This essay states that globalization doesn 't threaten cultural diversity because globalization gives us a wider view of how we see the world today. According to Giddens (1990) Globalization is the intensification of worldwide social relations which link distant localities in such a way that local happenings are shaped by events occurring miles away and vice versa, which he mentions as a “dialectical process”. Globalization spreads cultures and products around the world, connects people from everywhere, also it is something that affects the world as a whole. With that said, it doesn’t actually threaten anything, rather it expands ones freedom, renew cultures and cultural artifacts, while also giving people a wider range of choice. The freedom that we are given to choose the certain cultural experiences that we receive enhances the quality of our lives.
The bad side of globalization predominantly revolves around the fact that the preferences differ from nation to nation, and coming to a consensus on any issue becomes more difficult when too many nods are required. When it comes to globalization, the difference between the rich and poor nation can be a major hindrance. Even though the richer nations will try to assimilate and help poor nations come up, they will not sacrifice on their national interests willingly. Economic Problems: If the entire world becomes a global village, any sort of economic disruption in one nation will have a disastrous impact on various other nations which are closely related to it in terms of trade and commerce. It will be a domino-effect wherein disturbance in one economy would result in disturbance in another, and so
Globalization brings along several disadvantages, issues and challenges that should be addressed so as to make it easily acceptable .The lead disadvantage is of globalization is that it contributes immensely to the erosion of a people’s culture. Globalization has been proven to be a primary area of research that has been carried out in various cultural contexts (Pothukuchi et al, 2002).Globalization has also been proven to have a big effect in the Arab world as it has immensely affected practices in business and styles of management. What might be deemed to have been a negative effect of globalization on UAE has been effectively curbed though. This is because the UAE has managed to guard is natural culture and traditions via careful design of policy tracks. This is achievable as The Dubai Media City is pinned on the system of value and the dogmatic scaffold of the Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC countries).