In order to understand the challenges that global governance in health faces, it is essential to define global health itself first. Kickbusch (2006) defines global health as those health issues which exceed national borders and governments and request actions on the global forces and global flows that determine the health. In order to achieve global health new forms of governances at the national and international level are needed. These governances need to include a variety of different actors (Kickbusch, 2006). Global health asks for an acknowledgement of the need to act globally on emerging problems in health, of the importance of cross-border determinants of health and the need for global governance.
The literature suggests three different
…show more content…
SGH refers to the conditions in which individuals live and work and which influence the likelihood of living a healthy live (Labonté & Schrecker, 2007). Globalization affects SGH by its influence on trade liberalization, economic rearrangement, financial liberalization, the global restructuring of production and labour markets, effects through the physical environment and by changes in health systems made by the global marketplace (Labonté & Schrecker, 2007). It is suggested that trade liberalization positively affects a country’s economic growth, therefore augmenting resources and increase health services and access to other SDH. However, globalization has uneven affects, which are locally isolated (Labonté & Schrecker, 2007). Concerning labor markets and the global organization of production, globalization has led to increased competition, which may decrease a government’s ability to implement labor standards, health and safety regulations and other social policy measures. Furthermore a decline in salary of and demand for low-skilled workers, due to outsourcing, is affecting the deindustrialized, rich countries (Labonté & Schrecker, 2007). Globalization affects natural environments by the increase of demand for marketable resources and ecological services, therefore having a direct impact on the environments health. Finally changes in national health systems are made by the global marketplace. Here transnational institutions as the World Bank have a negative impact on health by promoting market-oriented concepts of health sector reforms, favoring private provision and financing. This leads to an increase of out-of-pocket payments by individuals, making health a private good which is dependent on the free market (Labonté & Schrecker, 2007). Globalization therefore has positive and negative effects on SDH. In order to balance these
This is a critical issue since people in underdeveloped communities lack access to sufficient medical care can prevent individuals from obtaining necessary healthcare, which can have serious consequences for their health and well-being. which raises morbidity and mortality rates. For instance, the lack of infrastructure and the absence of healthcare providers can make it difficult for rural populations to get healthcare services. In many places, getting the right medical care may require long journeys that can be both expensive and time-consuming. Another major issue facing the current healthcare system is healthcare affordability.
The development intensification of economic, political, ecological, social and cultural interconnections across international borders, it is what alludes to the term globalisation (Steger, 2009). Globalization is often argued to the only route to development and human contentment. However, these advances particularly in technology, political integrations and economic growth within and between countries has fragmented or shrunk the aspects of space, time and speed to some extent, at the environmental disbursement (Bozorgmehr, 2010). Additionally, all high-income countries (HICs), middle-income countries (MICs) and low-income countries LICs have unparalleled challenges associated with source, supply, demand, use and distribution of food, water,
To what extent does globalization contribute to sustainable prosperity for all people? Globalization contributes largely to sustainable prosperity for all people. Sustainable prosperity is when people of any ethnicity,religion or gender have all their needs met, all have an equal opportunity to create wealth and all to have the chance to pursue happiness. There are many groups that try to make sure everyone has sustainable prosperity. Based on the perspective demonstrated the source should be embraced to a certain extent.
The term social determinants of health, can be defined as a ‘set of conditions in which people are born, grow up, live and work.’ These conditions include housing, education, financial security and the environment along with the healthcare service. (http://www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/438838/01.12_Health_inequalities_and_the_social_determinants_of_health.pdf) These factors are affected by the amount of money, power and resources that are available at a global, national and local level. Social determinants of health are linked to health inequalities according to the World Health Organisation, health inequalities are ‘the unfair and avoidable differences in health status seen within and between countries.’
1. Three changes that I think that would contribute most to improving the health of people in the less developed nations is changing “income inequality,” having an equal health care among everyone, and changing the education system (Weitz 2017:52). By changing income inequality to be more equal among everyone, this should put people in the same socioeconomic status in which everyone can afford the same things like food, housing, health care, and education. Having income equality would contribute to improving the health of people in the less developed nations because it would provide everyone with the same resources, which can benefit more people’s health overall and lower the rates of malnutrition. Lowering malnutrition will also contribute
Sir Michael Marmot put into perspective how serious social disparities are and how they influence health not only between countries but also, within countries. The issue is not medical care; in fact the United States spends the most on medical care. You would initially think the country in which spends the most on medical care must have higher health rates. Well, believe it or not, this is actually false, for instance, sixty-two countries had higher maternal health rates than the United States. This displays that a lack of medical care fundamentally is not the conflict, whereas social inequality is.
Globalization is a massive thing that affects every person on the planet in one way or another. This source raises the argument that globalization is a disease that harms people in more ways then it helps and needs to be stopped before it wipes out the human race. This raises a good point is some ways because globalization does harm humans in many way such as losing jobs due to outsourcing and the people who get the outsourced jobs are put into horrible working conditions and underpaid without benefits. But it also helps in some ways with trade and communication strengthening the relations of countries. I do agree with the source that globalization harms many people but not quite to the extent that the author goes to, I think that
Globalisation is the integration between different countries and economies and the increased impact of international influences on all aspects of life and economic activity. There are many dimensions to globalisation, and there are many statistics that can be used as measures of globalisation. The major indicators of integration between economies include: international trade and trade flows, income gap between developed, emerging and developing economies and migration of labour force. Each of these indicators provides an insight into the way in which economies are now linked to each other and the extent to which a global economy is emerging. Globalisation contributes and sometimes hinders economic growth and quality of life.
Globalization and Public Health It is apparent that the flow of people, food, and manufactured goods can have many negative impacts on public health worldwide. The spread of infectious diseases such as the West Nile Virus and H1N1 – better known as the “swine flu” – have shown us that this ease of transport comes with a price. However, it is difficult to say if we should take measures to reduce the exchanges that have brought our world closer and closer together. We have grown so used to having things so connected and available that reducing this would regress the world as we know it.
Complex-systems approach leads to long-term sustainable solutions for health problems in modern society. It deals with the multifaceted system of health and creates a wider-scope of change. In the contemporary world, where health is seen as a personal concern, individuals are expected to be accountable for their own health and well-being. Government interventions are based on individualism and neoliberalism ideologies – minimizing government initiatives, increasing individual responsibility, commodifying health products and services, and further increasing inequities (1, 2, 3, 4).
Globalization has indeed impacted human rights worldwide; however as to whether the impact is negative or positive depends on which part of the world one finds him/herself. “Human Right” by definition “is the right which is believed to belong to every person”. The central idea of globalization is for businesses to develop international influence and operate on an international scale. Globalization has given people the right to information. Thanks to globalization technology has travelled all over the world to help people have easy access to information.
Nowadays, in the light of the development in technology, especially in transportation and media, trade and communication has increased rapidly among countries. This trend is called globalization. Generally speaking, globalization has its own advantages and disadvantages. The development in international trade and communication has created employment and opportunities for millions of people, but it has also made poor countries poorer. In my opinion, globalization has both positive and negative aspects.
Globalization is a process of linking the world through many aspects, from the economic to the culture, the political. in different nations. This process uses to describe the changes in society and in the world economy, by creating a linkage and increasing exchange between individuals, organizations or nations in cultural perspective, economics on global scale (Globalization 101, n.d.). A process of creating many opportunities but also causes many challenges for all the nations in the world, particularly for developing countries. There are so many advantages that globalization brings to developing countries like free trade, technology transfer and reducing unemployment.
Health and Globalization The movement of people, food, and manufactured goods have a negative impact on public health but they also have an equal positive effect as well. To take steps to decrease the flow of these people and items may show sought after results to the health community, but it is not the solution overall. We need the global economy to continue to foster trade relations of food, medical supplies, manufactured goods, and even tourism. These revenue streams aid countries in their development. Instead of “reducing the flow”, we should implement more direct procedures to limit the risks associated with these items.
4.0 Implementation 4.1 Broader perspective Globalization is affected by various factors that drive towards its existence and formation in the society and a set of these macroeconomic factors. As per this analysis we can get an overview of the current economy of the country that helps the researcher to make relevant suggestions and recommendations that can benefit the economy as well as society to make them believe and trust that the globalization enhances their behaviour and life style. PEST Analysis: Source: Visual.ly website PEST Analysis of Saudi Arabia Political environment Giddens and Griffiths (2006, p. 59) states that mainly there are three reasons why politics has become one of the main drivers of globalization.